0
   

Bush supporters' aftermath thread

 
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 01:41 pm
gungasnake wrote:
The election in 00 was close only by dint of massive fraud on the part of the democrats ...


Not that it matters much, but personally, I don't think that sorta unsubstantiated allegation serves either camp. Absent records documenting significant numbers of instances of arrest, prosecution and conviction pursuant to such charges, unfounded and malicious speculation is all there is.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 02:00 pm
timberlandko wrote:
gungasnake wrote:
The election in 00 was close only by dint of massive fraud on the part of the democrats ...


Not that it matters much, but personally, I don't think that sorta unsubstantiated allegation serves either camp. Absent records documenting significant numbers of instances of arrest, prosecution and conviction pursuant to such charges, unfounded and malicious speculation is all there is.


I believe there's substantially more than that. Polls all showed the 00 election a blowout five days before it was held, and the guys running those polls simply aren't that bad at what they do. The ONLY thing they are totally unable to account for is fraud.

It starts with all the claims of 100% voter turnout in areas in which, on a given day, half the adult population is either drunk on their asses, cracked out, flaked out, on the lam, in prison, dead (which doesn't really phase democrats for voting purposes), in exile, or otherwise incapacitated. I don't know about you, but I view those claims as an insult to my intelligence.

And then there's the scene where W. is up 60K votes in Florida with 25 minutes to go before counting is over, Algor calls up to concede, and 25 minutes later it's all but dead even. Seems obvious enough to me that somebody just manufactured 60K votes and spread them around and simply missed his tally by a couple thousand. In fact, a day or two later, they actually caught some democrat official driving around with a voting machine in the trunk of his car asnd, as usual, nothing ever came of that. That's the political equivalent of driving around with a neutron bomb in the trunk of one's car.

I mean, that's just the obvious and flagrant stuff.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 02:09 pm
timberlandko wrote:
gungasnake wrote:
The election in 00 was close only by dint of massive fraud on the part of the democrats ...


Not that it matters much, but personally, I don't think that sorta unsubstantiated allegation serves either camp. Absent records documenting significant numbers of instances of arrest, prosecution and conviction pursuant to such charges, unfounded and malicious speculation is all there is.


i'm with you timber.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 02:13 pm
That's your take, Snake, and you're welcome to take it anywhere you can find it a home. To this point, such allegations, whether levelled against Republicans or Democrats, despite the conviction and passion of the proponents of either camp, have found no home in the public records of the court system. For there to be a case, not only must argument for that case be presented, that case must prevail. Malfeasance alleged is not malfeasance proven.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 02:33 pm
If we're going to say that inaccurate polls before an election must mean electoral fraud was committed, then look no further than 2004.

I make no allegations. Just following gungasnake's curious logic...
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 02:43 pm
I s'pose curious is one way to put it.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 05:58 pm
Didn't most of the polls show W. taking about 51% of the vote this time out?
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 06:11 pm
The bottom line is that the polls were, and are irrelevant.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 08:05 pm
Dunno as I'd say the polls themselves are/were irrelevant; considered in proper perspective, they can be useful, if imprecise, indicators, the precision increasing both with proximity of the election at question and with the overall number of differing polls to be considered. The closer in time an election gets, and the more polls considered and compared, the more probable it becomes that the election results will fall within a range defined by the average margin of error for those polls. Nothing in recent history suggests anything was wrong either with the overall average of the many polls, nor with the elections themselves. What is irrelevant is any conclusion or suppositition discounting that fact.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 09:09 pm
Timber, did you notice the offshore books had every state they offered correct, as well as the election? Who need polls? :wink:
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 09:45 pm
i don't even like bush and i just accept that he won fair and square this election.

still not so sure about 2000, but hell, it's time to move on.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 09:56 pm
I always knew you were a good and wise man DTOM. Before all is said and done....I think you'll even come to like President Bush a little Smile

<I'm 3 for 3 on predictions, btw> Smile
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 10:02 pm
I often times repine for the good old days of LBJ (simple corruption-graft and creative voter-fraud) Agnew ( simple stupidy and greed) Nixon ( simple psychotic paranoia). George Bush is a entirely new case of bizarre meglomania.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Dec, 2004 11:20 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Timber, did you notice the offshore books had every state they offered correct, as well as the election?


Ohhhhh, you betchya :wink: Laughing
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Dec, 2004 12:13 am
So why aren't the campaign gurus hiring these people to do their internal polling?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Dec, 2004 12:25 am
Foxfyre wrote:
So why aren't the campaign gurus hiring these people to do their internal polling?
Because their findings are updated 24-7 for free... why pay them, when all you have to do is look?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Dec, 2004 12:29 am
They ain't pollsters, Fox, and don't nobody hire 'em; they's bookies - ya puts yer bets an' takes yer chances.

What it amounts to is the odds, or probability, of a given outcome, are directed by the betting interest in that outcome. The final odds before the election, averaged across all the open books, nailed the big one, got every state right, and got the margins within a decimal point. Nothin' new there - thats pretty much been the story for more than a decade, across well over a hundred elections damned near everywhere there have been major elections. Generally, it don't pay ta bet against the house. Go with the odds unless ya know somethin' special.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Dec, 2004 02:47 am
JustWonders wrote:
I always knew you were a good and wise man DTOM. Before all is said and done....I think you'll even come to like President Bush a little Smile

<I'm 3 for 3 on predictions, btw> Smile


a very nice compliment, jw. thank you. :wink:

like may be too strong a word. if he get's the important stuff done, i probably won't rag on him so much, though.

ball's in his court.

and i hope you've finished your christmas shopping, young lady. i sure haven't. just got paid for a 2 month project, just in time to face the rest of the rabid last minute christmas piranhas... yipe!!!!
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Dec, 2004 08:53 am
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
JustWonders wrote:
I always knew you were a good and wise man DTOM. Before all is said and done....I think you'll even come to like President Bush a little Smile

<I'm 3 for 3 on predictions, btw> Smile


a very nice compliment, jw. thank you. :wink:

like may be too strong a word. if he get's the important stuff done, i probably won't rag on him so much, though.

ball's in his court.

and i hope you've finished your christmas shopping, young lady. i sure haven't. just got paid for a 2 month project, just in time to face the rest of the rabid last minute christmas piranhas... yipe!!!!


I'm done Smile Leaving on a jet plane...not sure when I'll be back again....
<singing off key>

Actually I do know when I'll be back LOL. Heading your way...Christmas in sunshiney Southern Cali...courtesy GWB and Wall Street. Surfing in Pacific Beach...maybe LOL. Cool

As for the "ball being in his court"....history will judge him. We are witnessing that history in the making and who among us is not excited to be a part of it. You will see, DTOM. This president is on track to becoming one of America's greatest. I truly believe that. His vision and his work and his contributions in this 21st century are so significant that watching events unfold is nothing short of breathtaking.

Be patient. :wink:
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Dec, 2004 01:48 pm
JustWonders wrote:
Actually I do know when I'll be back LOL. Heading your way...Christmas in sunshiney Southern Cali...courtesy GWB and Wall Street. Surfing in Pacific Beach...maybe LOL. Cool


cool ! the weather is still pretty good. but if ya go surfing you'll definately wanna pack the body glove. if you're gonna be down pacific beach way, you might want to drop down to o.b.(ocean beach, that is ), if you've never been there. i haven't been there in a gazillion years, but that was the first place i lived out here. went from conservative louisville to living in an apartment building that backed up to the beach by the pier.

it was pretty funny ! four 18 year old rock musicians and 2 roadies let off the leash for the first time. yeeeee-hawwwwww!!!!!

talk about mayhem! we figured out pretty quick that we were not going to get any work done with all the beer, cheap grass and bikinis... uhh, i mean distractions Laughing

so we moved to a big house right across the boulevard from n.a.s. miramar. the neighbors weren't too impressed though. it seems that the volume of our mighty rock riffs was distracting them from fully enjoying the sound of the fighter jets that came over the neighborhood every few minutes... Rolling Eyes

don't forget to pack your liberal block. wouldn't wanna get all blotchy !
Laughing
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 11:32:23