0
   

Bush supporters' aftermath thread

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 06:44 am
Quote:
"We must continue the work of education reform to bring high standards and accountability, not just to our elementary and secondary schools, but to our high schools as well."
GW Bush, Washington, November 4, 2004
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 07:21 am
blatham - That reminds me of something I read in the Weekly Standard the other day.

Quote:
Former President Jimmy Carter, in an interview for the January issue of GQ magazine, reveals how, on the recommendation of then-CIA director Stansfield Turner, he once authorized a psychic to make targeting decisions--while "in a trance"--for America's satellite surveillance system:

GQ: One of the promises you made in 1976 was that if you were elected, you would look into the [UFO] reports from Roswell and see if there had been any cover-ups. Did you look into that?

Carter: Well, in a way. I became more aware of what our intelligence services were doing. There was only one instance that I'll talk about now. We had a plane go down in the Central African Republic--a twin-engine plane, small plane. And we couldn't find it. And so we oriented satellites that were going around the earth every ninety minutes to fly over that spot where we thought it might be and take photographs. We couldn't find it. So the director of the CIA came and told me that he had contacted a woman in California that claimed to have supernatural capabilities. And she went in a trance, and she wrote down latitudes and longitudes, and we sent our satellites over that latitude and longitude, and there was the plane.


<Just wait until Leno and Letterman get ahold of this :>
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 08:53 am
JW

You ought to read Lewis Lapham's account of his fresh-from-university employment interview at the CIA. Or, the account by a Sovietologist working in coordination with a special group set up by Bill Casey which had been set up precisely because there was no evidence at all of a Casey-postulated Soviet program...that total dirth of any evidence meant it had to be super secret and so it surely followed it had to be super dangerous, Casey reasoned.

But I'm pleased my Bush quote inspired you. Let's see what this one will bring to mind.
Quote:
"I believe we are called to do the hard work to make our communities and quality of life a better place."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 01:33 pm
From The Independent:

Review of the year: The Bush Administration
Scandal, incompetence - and dark clouds ahead
By Rupert Cornwell
Published: 30 December 2005
The White House, unlike Windsor Castle, was not ravaged by fire last year, nor did it witness any family disaster to match the divorce of Charles and Diana. But just as surely as 1992 was the annus horribilis for Queen Elizabeth II, 2005 gained the same dismal distinction for George W Bush.

For the 43rd American president, it was proof that Murphy's Law operates in politics as in every other walk of life.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 09:10 pm
blatham wrote:
JW

You ought to read Lewis Lapham's account of his fresh-from-university employment interview at the CIA.


I did. And another, more recent interview, this past Spring.

It's pretty amazing you'd mention him since I had (New Year's Eve of all times) just had a rather interesting conversation on this very subject. It started by way of a new year's greeting, in which a friend had included this Lapham quote:

The figure of the enthusiast who has just discovered jogging or a new way to fix tofu can be said to stand or, more accurately, to tremble on the threshold of conversion, as the representative American.

Of what does politics consist except the making of imperfect decisions, many of them unjust and quite a few of them deadly?

People may expect too much of journalism. Not only do they expect it to be entertaining, they expect it to be true.


Now in his 70's, Lapham is nostalgic for the country of his youth, which he perceives as more generous of spirit and unity. You and he, I think, share some similarities, as you both see these traits as having diminished in America over time.

I, on the other hand, think they're alive and well...certainly in the red states and among the religious. It's "enlightened" folk like Lapham who've done the most to try to destroy these values and the faults noted by him are surely seen by some as the unintended consequences of liberal progress. In other words, Lapham notes the outcome, but fails to note the cause. Much like you.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 11:48 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
george, The only "paranoid fantasies" on these threads are the continued mention of 9-11 by the president in most of his speeches, and the "fear" of another attack on US soil.
Shocked "fear" of another attack on US soil by the same, at large, person whose already warned us that the reasons for his 9-11 attack still exist constitutes "paranoid fantasies"? Really? Confused
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:01 am
It's paranoid if the words of a terrorist like Osama controls your life and freedoms. Just because there were some bombings in London and Bali, doesn't mean I'll stay away from my favorite city and favorite island. You are free to become paralyzed by Osama's words, but I refuse to sacrifice my freedoms and live in fear.
0 Replies
 
Magginkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:08 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
It's paranoid if the words of a terrorist like Osama controls your life and freedoms. Just because there were some bombings in London and Bali, doesn't mean I'll stay away from my favorite city and favorite island. You are free to become paralyzed by Osama's words, but I refuse to sacrifice my freedoms and live in fear.



I agree Cicerone, especially when it appears that we have more to fear from that nut case who squats in the Oval Office.
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:23 am
Blatham's comment concerning "the total dirth(sic) of any evidence just shows that he has a total dearth of any spelling acumen. His obvious lack of spelling skills matches his more sequestered lack of accurate information regarding politics. I really don't know how Blotham arrived at his conclusion regarding "the total dirth(sic) of any evidence since he never, or hardly ever, posts and links to PROVE that he is telling the truth.He might as well be telling us of the UFO he rode in.
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:24 am
Cicerone Imposter missed Madrid--My favorite city to which I never go anymore.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:24 am
As a matter of fact, blatham did tell us about his UFO ride. Too bad you missed it.
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:40 am
Was he on the moon ride or the Saturn trip?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:49 am
Neither. It was a short ride far enough to see the curvature of the earth.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 01:07 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
It's paranoid if the words of a terrorist like Osama controls your life and freedoms. Just because there were some bombings in London and Bali, doesn't mean I'll stay away from my favorite city and favorite island. You are free to become paralyzed by Osama's words, but I refuse to sacrifice my freedoms and live in fear.
Better, but still plenty overstated. Neither Paralyzed nor paranoid describes me very well. In fact; I'm looking forward to meeting you (and hopefully Blatham) in Chicago in a few months. :wink:
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 07:21 am
Yikes

Quote:
Support for President Bush and for the war in Iraq has slipped significantly in the last year among members of the military's professional core, according to the 2005 Military Times Poll.
http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2005_main.php
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 07:32 am
Under the heading of PLEASE STOP LYING.

One month ago, the Bush administration released the"National Strategy for Victory In Iraq," document to demonstrate that, by golly, they sure had a plan for Iraq all worked out and, with resolve, would sure as heck be following that plan for the good of Iraqis and for freedom and just because resolve is resolve and that's what they are all about, being principled and manly as all get out. Here's what it said about infrastructure rebuild...
Quote:
- Restore Iraq's infrastructure to meet increasing demand and the needs of a growing economy;


And then, today...
Quote:
The Bush administration does not intend to seek any new funds for Iraq reconstruction in the budget request going before Congress in February, officials say. The decision signals the winding down of an $18.4 billion U.S. rebuilding effort in which roughly half of the money was eaten away by the insurgency, a buildup of Iraq's criminal justice system and the investigation and trial of Saddam Hussein.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010200370_pf.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 07:49 am
Under the heading of HEY KRISTOL, YOU TOO, PLEASE STOP LYING

Quote:
A Zeal to Defend Secrecy

Saturday, December 24, 2005; Page A15

In their zeal to defend President Bush for ordering the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on communications of American citizens, William Kristol and Gary Schmitt got key things wrong regarding the FBI's terrorism investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui ["Vital Presidential Power," op-ed, Dec. 20].

They are wrong about Moussaoui being a "U.S. person" who required a higher standard of probable cause under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Moussaoui was a French citizen in the United States with an expired temporary visa, which means that the higher FISA standard did not apply.

More important, and contrary to Kristol and Schmitt's assertion that "the Justice Department decided there was not sufficient evidence to get a FISA warrant to allow the inspection of his computer files," no evidence of Moussaoui's suspicious flight training and ties with terrorism was presented to the Justice Department. The department was never contacted and so did not decide anything; therefore, no decision was ever made regarding the given evidence and its subsequent application to FISA standards.

That means the FISA procedures were not the reason the FBI failed to inspect Moussaoui's computer files. Rather, the FBI's failure to share and analyze intelligence sufficiently is what enabled Moussaoui to escape further investigation.

-- Coleen Rowley

LINK
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 08:40 am
JW wrote:
Quote:
Now in his 70's, Lapham is nostalgic for the country of his youth, which he perceives as more generous of spirit and unity. You and he, I think, share some similarities, as you both see these traits as having diminished in America over time.

Nostalgia is an inevitable function of aging. You'll find this to be so too. Beloved things disappear...a favorite climbing tree, friends, grandmothers, the apple orchard where you and Biff both enthusiastically set aside your virginity. The risk of nostalgia is, of course, faulty perception regarding the excitement and promise of the modern. The other side of that equation is discrediting the knowledge/wisdom benefits that only experience can provide. This is a generational dialectic and will ever be a fundamental source of conflict. Of course, one has to be careful when thinking about instances of it. For example, unless you are a complete nitwit (and you aren't) you'll see upon reflection that your comment arguably applies much more appropriately to Bill Bennett than to Lewis Lapham or myself. You could simply count the number of "it was better back then" claims per paragraph in anything the three of us have written.

Quote:
I, on the other hand, think they're alive and well...certainly in the red states and among the religious. It's "enlightened" folk like Lapham who've done the most to try to destroy these values and the faults noted by him are surely seen by some as the unintended consequences of liberal progress. In other words, Lapham notes the outcome, but fails to note the cause. Much like you.

You ought to take a close and honest look at the degree to which this thesis is untethered from an empirical foundation. That would lead you to an investigation of assumptions you hold but haven't really investigated to see if they are true of if they are sensible. For example, why would you consider that 'red state' values represent the most accurate representation of America? If one feature of America which makes it unique is that it is a 'melting pot', then why not consider that New York is the truer representation than Kansas? If America is represented by your framers, with their sophisticated educations and their broad respect for Enlightenment notions, then does it not seem more appropriate to consider Lapham a truer reflection of this America than a gun-totin', academic-hating long-haul truck driver from Albuquerque?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 09:18 am
Blatham
Blatham wrote: "If America is represented by your framers, with their sophisticated educations and their broad respect for Enlightenment notions, then does it not seem more appropriate to consider Lapham a truer reflection of this America than a gun-totin', academic-hating long-haul truck driver from Albuquerque?"

Blatham - gotcha! From Albuquerque? Now hold on there you elitist, snobbish, Canada-loving, anti-Albuquerque stupid intellectual dude!

BBB :wink:
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 09:23 am
Re: Blatham
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Blatham wrote: "If America is represented by your framers, with their sophisticated educations and their broad respect for Enlightenment notions, then does it not seem more appropriate to consider Lapham a truer reflection of this America than a gun-totin', academic-hating long-haul truck driver from Albuquerque?"

Blatham - gotcha! From Albuquerque? Now hold on there you elitist, snobbish, Canada-loving, anti-Albuquerque stupid intellectual dude!

BBB :wink:


Damn,I fit that description also,except I'm not from Albuquerque.
And since I have a degree,I am not "academic hating".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 01:36:30