FreeDuck wrote:[Let's see them, then. Show me how the feds were on the job. If it had been a terrorist attack and they didn't show up for days, or didn't fill out the necessary paperwork to allow New Mexico's national guard to help, or didn't even know where people were taking shelter, would you still say they did a great job? Have a look at the National Response Plan on the DHS site and tell me that they followed it. The point about local and state governments being first responders is moot in cases where they have indicated that they don't have the resources to respond. In such cases, what do you suggest the rest of the country do, stand back and watch them flounder?
After 911, we were told that the new DHS make us better at responding to catastrophe. Clearly, that's not the case.
Nonsense, hyperbole, and sophistry.
The Federal Government's primary role in combatting terrorisn is the PREVENTION and deterrance of an attack. So far the Administration has been remarkably successful at that.
The fact that local government doesn't have the needed resources is the result of exactly two distinct factors: (1) The scale of the natural disaster overwhelmed the back up resources prudently and reasonably available; and (2) The government agencies themselves were derelict in their responsibilities before the event in establishing sufficient redundancy in infrastructure systems, stockpiled materials and organizational readiness. The first of these causes appplies equally to both local and national governments. In the case of the second the lapses of local government in Louisiana dwarf those of the Federal government.
The fact that the stormwater pumping stations in New Orleans failed when the electrical power grid went down, but those in adjacent Jefferson Parish kept operating, opens an interesting question. Why, in a city that is below mean sea level and which is utterly dependent on these pumping systems, was there not a reliable back up power supply system in place with in place reserve fuel, constructed at a level above maximum flood surges? This, it seems to me is an utterly inexcusable failure on the part of the city. Why did the entire city communications system break down at the same time? These two failures were the direct cause of a large portion of the unnecessary damage and delay in response by local government and they seriously compounded numerous unrelated recocery efforts by all levels of government.
It is very easy to fault government bureaucracy at all levels. We want our government to be fair, not efficient. My experience has been that, in general, Federal bureaucracies function marginally better than do those of most states. More or less by definition bureaucracies are as interested and focused on their own internal rules and procedures as they are on the service or outcome they are intended to deliver. This is, of course, a good reason to prefer smaller government and private & individual solutions to our problems over government ones.
The pieces here quoted and pasted by Cicerone and others appear to involve a high degree of selective reporting of material all laced with quotes and excerpts offered without context or background. No serious person should take them as representative of the truth of the matters reported. In war and in natural disasters initial reports are almost always wrong or replete with error and misinformation. Most of the critics are quoted as loudly demanding that the Federal government solve their proiblems right now. While we all wish to do all that is possible to relieve the suffering of the people affected by this disaster, it just isn't possible in this or any country to simply use government to instantly solve everyone's problems. Moreover such a government would find a way to make itself intolerable in other areas of our lives. This is the United States of America - we have prospered based on the principles of self-reliance, local government and individual freedom. We don't need or want a nanny government "protecting" us from all of life's ills - and generally doing so at the cost of our freedom. The fact is that the individual actions of generous people and groups across the country are already doing a remarkable job in assisting the victims of this disaster. This, of course, is as it should be.