@maxdancona,
Quote:1) Our immigration system is deeply flawed in that it is completely detached from economic reality. If our immigration laws were enforced to the letter, several sectors of our economy would collapse. For example, our agricultural sector would either fold up and go to Mexico (after the workers), or the price of our food would increase drastically.
The flaw in our immigration isn't economic, there are solutions to some of those problems, technology for instance could be heavily used in the agricultural, robot or remotely controlled machines. My grandfather was one of those kids who worked on a farm before modern farming machines made the work he did nonexistent. Why hire 40 people to pick corn when a machine can pick twice the corn in half the time?
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/07/14/robot-farming/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanised_agriculture
Quote:2) Human behavior (including yours) is effected as much by economic reality than by laws. You drive over the speed limit. The problem of Americans downloading music and movies illegally was to give up on enforcement and change the laws. Many Americans still break the letter of the copyright laws. Since the industry realized it wasn't worth fighting in many cases, no one cares.
Wrong, the govt joined the side of the entertainment lobbyists and enacted the DMCA, which increased the penalties on those who downloaded movies or music.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act
Quote:The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a United States copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures (commonly known as digital rights management or DRM) that control access to copyrighted works. It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself. In addition, the DMCA heightens the penalties for copyright infringement on the Internet.[1][2] Passed on October 12, 1998, by a unanimous vote in the United States Senate and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on October 28, 1998, the DMCA amended Title 17 of the United States Code to extend the reach of copyright, while limiting the liability of the providers of online services for copyright infringement by their users.
The DMCA's principal innovation in the field of copyright is the exemption from direct and indirect liability of Internet service providers and other intermediaries. This exemption was adopted by the European Union in the Electronic Commerce Directive 2000. The Copyright Directive 2001 implemented the 1996 WIPO Copyright Treaty in the EU.
A co-worker of mine just received a DMCA violation letter from Comcast today.
Quote:3) The real battle of immigration is over American Culture. The biggest disagreement between Gunga and I (which is mirrored by many Republicans in Congress, and by Trump in some of his tweets) is what American Culture means.
Isn't our culture important? Isn't the point of people coming to the US is to become an American? No ones says people can't have their own culture privately, but should we shift the our culture to adjust to those coming here, or make them adjust to our way of life? We used to be known as the Great Melting Pot but that isn't the case any more. Assimilation has slowed or in some cases it is refused, Cultural Appropriation is now a bad thing, if you ain't black then you better not have loop earrings...
Quote:There is the idea that people going to a Mosque, or speaking Spanish is damaging to real Americans. Many of us disagree. Note: I am being careful here not to use the word "racism". I am trying to describe a real difference in as fair a way as possible.
Speaking Spanish isn't damaging to Americans, it's damaging to those who don't learn to speak English. Going to a Mosque? There have been some communities who have been against Mosques being built in there, and in most cases the courts ruled against the communities.
Quote:It is a fact that most people in Boston and New York have no problem with hearing multiple languages in public, wearing religious garb or many types or having different skin colors or foods.
Most people in most parts of the country don't have a problem with hearing different languages or seeing people dress properly. Most of us eat foods from different cultures and in fact some cultures have benefited from such an exchange. Jews at Christmas time is interesting, traditional Chinese restaurants don't close on Christmas because most of them are Buddhist, so most of the Jews I know eat Chinese or Sushi for Xmas when most restaurants are closed for the holiday.
Quote:We feel that there is a misguided goal of immigration policy, to favor the traditional White Protestant culture over every other culture. That is why when Republicans talk about the threat to "American Culture" it makes me respond defiantly. To my family, speaking Spanish is a big part of American culture.
Your impression isn't accurate in the least. When it comes to immigration, a majority of us don't care where people come from as long as they come legally. We also don't want a bunch of people who have to be cared for by taxpayer dollars, we want people who can contribute to society not show up and get free social services right off the bat. We need to change the terms of being born in the US. A lot of you guys are so big on "being like the EU", well lets start with birth-right citizenship. At least one parent has to be a US citizen, that will solve a lot of our immigration issues as people will stop coming here to have "anchor babies".
We want people who want to actually be Americans, and while we are at it, can we get rid of the *-American? The only people who should be *-American are those who were actually born in another country and became US citizens. Anyone born here is an American, plain and simple, using the hyphen only serves to divide us as a culture.
Quote:4) If we had an immigration policy that was fair, economically sound, and accepting cultural diversity, then I would support a strong enforcement.
What's fair? How do you determine fair? Fair to the US, fair to illegal immigrants?
Economically sound? How about we stop letting companies hire people on H1 visa's to replace American workers? How about making it so only US citizens receive social services?
Accepting cultural diversity: How about those that move to the US accept US culture instead? How many places around the country have taken down US flags because it might be offensive to immigrants? It seems cultural diversity is a one way street.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/28/us/hampshire-college-flag-veterans-protest.html?_r=0