@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
If you don't believe it, I'm not going to convince you and I'm not trying to.
There must be a circle of Dante's Hell reserved for politicians who attempt to curry excessive favor with the MSM — or any other press. The big white-toothed smile accompanies the earnest expression of righteous indignation and show of concern for the key constituency of the moment. Always a good performance.
I know what you mean about "liberal bias" in the MSM but I don't believe it prevents anyone of any political stripe from being able to decipher a well-researched story and discriminate between the facts and the tone employed to convey the facts. I know conservatives who listen to NPR and find it useful. It's as if you don a special filtering headset which identifies serial liberal tendencies like
hand-wringing,
minority-coddling, and
new age sensitivity and reduces them to back scatter while the listener extracts the pertinent facts and comes to his own conclusions. As an anti-rightist, I don't find that the presentation of news by the conservative media establishment works in a reciprocal fashion, however. I identify a much heavier use of classic propaganda techniques in a typical Fox News production. The stories seem to be crafted specifically to dull the effect of unwelcome facts and substitute an alternative platform when one isn't really needed.
It reminds me of evangelicals who sent their children to "godless" public schools for years where the kids might have been exposed to concepts like "evolution" — it wasn't a problem. The faith community was able to distinguish between the world as presented by the establishment and the world as
they interpreted it. But then that wasn't good enough. They needed to have educational systems that told the story exclusively from
their side. Even the natural world is sectarian.