@giujohn,
giujohn wrote:
Yup...just as I thought it was all a ******* lie...more fake news.
All the people in the room with Trump deny the account of "unnamed" sources. And all you silly cheese heads bought it hook line and sinker.
Yeah, John, this leak supposedly came from "current and former U.S. officials."
"Former" officials? How the hell would they know in the first place?
Even if he did this (which he denies), even Wapo, after going on for many paragraphs acting like it would be a major crime, admits that "as president, Trump has broad authority to declassify government secrets, making it unlikely that his disclosures broke the law."
He has the right to declassify info if he wants.
Quote: He did not reveal the specific intelligence-gathering method, but he described how the Islamic State was pursuing elements of a specific plot and how much harm such an attack could cause under varying circumstances.
Russia and the United States both regard the Islamic State as an enemy and share limited information about terrorist threats.
And if these anonymous sources were really so concerned about leaks, then why would they give a public newspaper classified details?
Quote:The Post is withholding most plot details, including the name of the city, at the urging of oThe Post is withholding most plot details, including the name of the city, at the urging of officials who warned that revealing them would jeopardize important intelligence capabilities..
First they supposedly say" ... the urging of officials who warned that revealing them would jeopardize important intelligence capabilities," and then, in the next breath, these "concerned officials" supposedly tell every damn thing they claim to know to a newspaper, including info which "jeoparidzes intelligence capacities."
"Withholding, eh? You can bet everybody and his brother at that rag have the (false) details to regale their buddies with.