192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  2  
Sun 14 May, 2017 09:57 am
@hightor,
Sorry, missed your earlier post.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Sun 14 May, 2017 09:57 am
@McGentrix,
Hey guys, I warned you.

Don't click on the links I provide.

Ever.

(I like the pictures of GWB and Ford with their feet on the desk.)
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  4  
Sun 14 May, 2017 09:58 am
@giujohn,
wow, talk about having ones head up one's ass. You sure are a poster child .
hightor
 
  4  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:00 am
@giujohn,
What's he accomplished? A travel ban by executive order? I don't think simply undoing everything done by your predecessor really counts.
blatham
 
  3  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:05 am
Super-genius-level notions from all over...
Quote:
President Trump reportedly eschews exercise because he believes it drains the body’s “finite” energy resources, but experts say this argument is flawed because the human body actually becomes stronger with exercise.

Trump’s views on exercise were mentioned in a New Yorker article this month and in “Trump Revealed,” The Washington Post’s 2016 biography of the president, which noted that Trump mostly gave up athletics after college because he “believed the human body was like a battery, with a finite amount of energy, which exercise only depleted.”
WP
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:06 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

What's he accomplished? A travel ban by executive order? I don't think simply undoing everything done by your predecessor really counts.


Finn dAbuzz
 
  -3  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:07 am
@McGentrix,
Agreed, but notice that the NYT has repeatedly jumped to BS conclusions without any evidence.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:09 am
@hightor,
Maybe you didn't read about the trade agreements with China or the reduction in illegal immigration, or the appointment of an excellent SC Justice. To name but three.
blatham
 
  3  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:25 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Maybe you didn't read about the trade agreements with China

From the Financial Times
Quote:
Critics pan Trump’s ‘early harvest’ trade deal with China

President accused of being outplayed by Beijing as ‘gigantic’ agreement draws derision
FT

Quote:
or the reduction in illegal immigration
Here's the chart that shows border apprehensions. The trend, obviously, has nothing to do with Trump whatsoever.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/files/2017/04/BORDER.png&w=1484 WP

Quote:
, or the appointment of an excellent SC Justice. To name but three.
He was given a list of names from AEI and the Federalist Society and he picked one (from central casting). Now there's an accomplishment to be proud of.
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:27 am
@layman,
In this clip Trump notes, among other things, that 32 bills have come through congress and been signed into law by him while some outlets were reporting that 0, none, nada, had been passed.

What people think he's done will depend a lot on who they want to hear report to them. Lies aside, what a paper chooses NOT to report can often tell you more about their agenda than what they do.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:30 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
The trade agreement with China was good, in principle, although not what we were expected to see. Wasn't the reduction in illegal immigration accomplished by using the blunt instrument of reducing immigration in general? (Which, personally, I don't find that objectionable, but that's another story.) I don't consider the appointment and seating of Gorsuch to be that much a mark of political skill on Trump's part. He named the guy, picked from a list I believe, but the actual mechanics of the confirmation were pretty much a done deal and the credit really belongs to Mitch McConnell. (IMHO)
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:34 am
Making Americans stupider every day.
Quote:
In Arizona, teachers can now be hired with absolutely no training in how to teach
New legislation signed into law in Arizona by Republican Gov. Doug Ducey (R) will allow teachers to be hired with no formal teaching training, as long as they have five years of experience in fields “relevant” to the subject they are teaching. What’s “relevant” isn’t clear.

The Arizona law is part of a disturbing trend nationwide to allow teachers without certification or even any teacher preparation to be hired and put immediately to work in the classroom in large part to help close persistent teacher shortages. It plays into a misconception that anyone can teach if they know a particular subject and that it is not really necessary to first learn about curriculum, classroom management and instruction.

The legislation was championed by Ducey, who has described it as a positive change that will entice “great teachers” into the classroom and help alleviate Arizona’s teacher shortages.

The state has been struggling with severe shortages as thousands of teachers have left the state in recent years for reasons including low pay, insufficient classroom resources, and so many testing requirements and teaching guidelines that they feel they have no flexibility and too little authentic instructional time.
WP
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:36 am
If you're at war, and can do something to undermine the economy of your enemy, well, then, that's a good thing.

Trump knows this and says that one reason for ending daily press briefings is to deprive the MSN of the extra income they collect from the extremely high ratings those press briefings generate.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:52 am
This is interesting
Quote:
By a 54 – 38 percent margin, American voters want the Democratic Party to win control of the U.S. House of Representatives. This is the widest margin ever measured for this question in a Quinnipiac University poll, exceeding a 5 percentage point margin for Republicans in 2013.
NYMag
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Sun 14 May, 2017 10:56 am
@blatham,
**** you're dour. Is being Canadian really that shitty?
blatham wrote:

From the Financial Times
Quote:
Critics pan Trump’s ‘early harvest’ trade deal with China

President accused of being outplayed by Beijing as ‘gigantic’ agreement draws derision
FT

Every journey begins with small steps. Any kind of trade deal with China at this point is a win. But, you and the FT will see sour everywhere because that is what you want to see.

Quote:
Quote:
or the reduction in illegal immigration
Here's the chart that shows border apprehensions. The trend, obviously, has nothing to do with Trump whatsoever.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/files/2017/04/BORDER.png&w=1484 WP

Much like most of your jibber-jabber, your graph is meaningless.
Number of immigrants caught at Mexican border plunges 40% under Trump

Quote:
Quote:
, or the appointment of an excellent SC Justice. To name but three.
He was given a list of names from AEI and the Federalist Society and he picked one (from central casting). Now there's an accomplishment to be proud of.


The Federalist Society! Oh my gosh! The boogeyman has a new face and name! That's so authoritarian of Trump!
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  4  
Sun 14 May, 2017 12:57 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote McGentrix:
Quote:
More evidence that Obamacare was a complete and utter failure.


http://www.npr.org/news/graphics/2017/05/propublica-mortality-rates.png

Obamacare only had two years to work in this graph. If you take a look at where the sharp acceleration upward in maternal deaths began, it was the first year AFTER Bill Clinton left office.

Another illustration of how this country went to hell when we let Bush steal the election from Gore.
hightor
 
  8  
Sun 14 May, 2017 01:12 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote:

More evidence that Obamacare was a complete and utter failure.

At least be honest: more evidence that the Republicans successfully prevented the effective implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Really, McG, wasn't that legislation something around 3,000 pages? It attempted to address problems in an industry that makes up something like a sixth of our economy. The usual process when there are difficulties with such a complex new set of laws and regulations is to revisit the legislation and fix what's not working and fine tune the parts that need improvement. Refusing to make necessary changes, working to defund key provisions, and repeatedly filing lawsuits against the legislation hardly means the program was a "complete and utter failure". The utter failure so far has been on the part of the Republicans to make good on Trump's promise of cheaper, better insurance for all.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -3  
Sun 14 May, 2017 01:44 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

wow, talk about having ones head up one's ass. You sure are a poster child .


And you're just a child.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -4  
Sun 14 May, 2017 01:51 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

What's he accomplished? A travel ban by executive order? I don't think simply undoing everything done by your predecessor really counts.


51% of the electorate disagreed with you on that one.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Sun 14 May, 2017 02:12 pm
@giujohn,
Where did you imagine that figure from? Last I saw, support for Obamacare was somewhere around 55%, while support for Trumpcare was around 17%. Around 70^ disagreed with his immigration bans. A[[rpva; of his actions so far in office is around 40%. Basically most of the country think he sucks.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 10:25:28