@revelette1,
Quote:You make it sound so simple, lower spending.
It is simple, it's the politics that make it difficult.
Quote:Which one is going to be lowered? Social Security? Medicaid/Medicare? Military?
Are these the only govt programs that can be cut? Of course not but by mentioning these programs, you highlight the political side of the debate.
Quote:Aren't those the biggest budget spenders?
You don't always have to start with the big "spenders", you can start with smaller duplicate programs, and others that have several other area's of overlap with other programs. It's the small stuff that is going to add up. Do we really need to spend research money on the mating habits of shrimp, we already have shrimp farms that seem to completely understand how it works, why taxpayer funds? (This was a study done in Canada)
Quote:All of the polls show most voters and American citizens want the government to help with health care and other government programs even if you have to pay more in taxes,
Polls are improtant but the govt is suppose to be limited in it's power and scope. Where does govt care and and personal responsibility start/stop?
Quote:preferably the richest at the top.
Polls state people want more stuff but want others to pay for it? Why doesn't this surprise me. More stuff is ok as long as someone else is footing the bill. There should be a limit to how much compassion the govt can show with other peoples money.
Quote:We are supposed to be a government of the people and if the people want more help with health care and the cost of living with the elderly and poor and middle class, then we should find a way to do it.
We are a govt of the people by the people and for the people, we are mot a govt to take from one group of people and give to another. Can you point to the place in the Constitution where we are allowed to rob Peter to pay Paul?