@hightor,
hightor wrote:
The irony of it all — Republicans criticizing inner city residents for electing Democrats while simultaneously working to disenfranchise those same inner city voters...
I would discuss that with you if you'd like to. I think that
disenfranchise is an overused term for asking Americans to meet a bare, I mean rock bottom, minimum standard. Have an ID. (I assume that is what you are referring to here?) Voting for felons is a state thing, not a party thing. But, back to having an ID.
I do think that if you are going to require an ID, then acquiring an ID must be made easy. Making an ID be required and then having only 3 places in the state to get an ID is ridiculous by any measure.
But, let me throw this in here, not to change the subject or anything like that, but just to add perspective... in New York State, poor people can not afford a pistol license (mandatory training class, background check, fingerprinting, must purchase gun before you get license, licensing fees). It has been made near impossible for middle classed people. Do you see any problem with that? In addition, a NYS pistol permit isn't even good in all parts of NYS...
Other states do not have such draconian measures. But, do you see the comparison I am making? Both are rights guaranteed under the Constitution.