192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:29 am
@blatham,
Ridiculous ! The only interference in our election process came at the hands of DNC staffers and CNN reporters who conspired to thwart Bernie Sander's more-successful-than-programmed primary campaign, and later the election debates with the Republican Candidate. It appears that Russian hackers were involved in getting and leaking some documents confirming all this. FBI staffers monitoring various hacking efforts tried repeatedly to warn the DNC but were ignored. Now Democrats embarrassed by these missteps, an ineffective campaign and widespread political losses across the country are excitedly and neurotically attempting to hide the truth from themselves and their base supporters.
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:29 am
Those of you here mainly interested in insulting other posters, either grow up or go away.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:44 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
. In so many ways he is so obviously unqualified to be President. IMO


I second that! He scares the bejezuz out of me! He sees things nobody else sees like the thousands of Muslims cheering while the twin towers were destroyed.

On top of that, he questioned Obama's birthplace for five years. Yes, five years.

He's mentally unstable.
snood
 
  6  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:47 am
@cicerone imposter,
It is really scary, C.I. He's gotten us closer to armed conflict with North Korea and Russia than we've been in decades, all through his brainless bumbling and chest-thumping.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:52 am
@snood,
Many of us can see that, but how about the Trump supporters?
40% still approve Trump. Scary.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:54 am
Gabe Sherman, who knows as much about how Fox operates as anyone outside the creature itself, thinks O'Reilly may have just broadcast his last show.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/04/is-bill-oreilly-going-off-the-air.html
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:03 am
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
He's mentally unstable.


Trump is hardly the only one, Cicerone. Deep, deep, pathological denial is commonplace among Americans and other westerners too.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:05 am
@blatham,
I saw shades of Joe McCarthy in that picture of O'Reilly. Is he off to drink himself to death?
layman
 
  -4  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:06 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Those of you here mainly interested in insulting other posters, either grow up or go away.

You insult the intelligence of every poster here with virtually every post you make, eh, Blabby?

When ya leavin?
blatham
 
  5  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:13 am
Here's a smart point.
Quote:
How is it that a group as disorganized as the Trump Administration has been so methodical when it comes to the (anti) environment? The simplest answer is that money focusses the mind. Lots of corporations stand to profit from Trump’s regulatory rollback, even as American consumers suffer. Auto manufacturers, for example, had argued that the 2022 fuel-efficiency standards were too expensive to meet. (This is the case even though, when they accepted a federal bailout, during the Obama Administration, the car companies said that the standards were achievable.) Similarly, utilities have argued that the power-plant rules are too costly to comply with. Coal companies will probably benefit from the rollbacks. So, too, will oil companies, and perhaps also ceiling-fan manufacturers, though, in the case of the appliance standards, the affected manufacturers were at the table when the proposed regulations were drafted.

But, while money is clearly key, it doesn’t seem entirely sufficient as an explanation. There’s arguably more money, in the long run, to be made from imposing the regulations—from investing in solar and wind power, for example, and updating the country’s electrical grid. Writing recently in the Washington Post, Amanda Erickson proposed an alternative, or at least complementary, explanation. Combatting a global environmental problem like climate change would seem to require global coöperation. If you don’t believe in global coöperation because “America comes first,” then you’re faced with a dilemma. You can either come up with an alternative approach—tough to do—or simply pretend that the problem doesn’t exist.

“Climate change denial is not incidental to a nationalist, populist agenda,” Erickson argues. “It’s central to it.” She quotes Andrew Norton, the director of the International Institute for Environment and Development, in London, who observes, “Climate change is a highly inconvenient truth for nationalism,” as it “requires collective action between states.” This argument can, and probably should, be taken one step further. The fundamental idea behind the environmental movement—the movement that gave us Earth Day in the first place—is that everything, and therefore everyone, is connected.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/earth-day-in-the-age-of-trump
blatham
 
  5  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:21 am
@camlok,
I don't know if he's a drinker at the problem level. He said he's taking a long-planned vacation. That's likely bullshit. Murdoch will make a decision based entirely on his perception of advantage/disadvantage to money in.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  2  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:22 am
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Ridiculous ! The only interference in our election process came at the hands of DNC staffers and CNN reporters who conspired to thwart Bernie Sander's more-successful-than-programmed primary campaign, and later the election debates with the Republican Candidate. It appears that Russian hackers were involved in getting and leaking some documents confirming all this. FBI staffers monitoring various hacking efforts tried repeatedly to warn the DNC but were ignored. Now Democrats embarrassed by these missteps, an ineffective campaign and widespread political losses across the country are excitedly and neurotically attempting to hide the truth from themselves and their base supporters.

Well said!
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  0  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:23 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Those of you here mainly interested in insulting other posters, either grow up or go away.
Blatham appears here to have low tolerance for disagreement. That's unfortunate. Could this be an indicator of an authoritarian personality?
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:27 am
Quote:
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—An overwhelming majority of Americans say that their lives have improved since Kellyanne Conway went away, a new poll finds.

According to the poll, Americans have been sleeping more, eating better, and enjoying a markedly greater sense of well-being following Conway’s sudden departure.

“I had lost my zest for life,” Carol Foyler, a poll respondent, said. “Now that Kellyanne Conway is gone, I greet every day with a smile, I feel my energy coming back, and I want to have sex again.
NYer
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:28 am
@georgeob1,
Quote:
Blatham appears here to have low tolerance for disagreement. That's unfortunate. Could this be an indicator of an authoritarian personality?

Get real you ******* douchebag.
georgeob1
 
  0  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:35 am
@blatham,
Having a bad day ???
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:38 am
@georgeob1,
No, though it is raining again here. Just thought I'd respond as an example of worthless and destructive insult posts. Mind you, yours wasn't an example of anything much better.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:40 am
@snood,
Quote:
He's gotten us closer to armed conflict with North Korea and Russia than we've been in decades, all through his brainless bumbling and chest-thumping.


And he would be different than other war criminal US presidents how?
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:47 am
@layman,
Quote:
You insult the intelligence of every poster here with virtually every post you make, eh, Blabby?


Another whiny hypocrite.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 11:50 am
@georgeob1,
Quote:
Blatham appears here to have low tolerance for disagreement. That's unfortunate. Could this be an indicator of an authoritarian personality?


That he does, george, but you, of all people, should not be pointing fingers in this regard. Your posts are mostly pompous, overblown pandering to a narrow minded, conservative, rah rah America viewpoint.

Is there anything more narrow minded than that?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.8 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 12:04:49