Authoritarianism has two faces: (1) the personality type who desires the autonomous power to direct and control others for the sake of having and using that power and (2) those people who are more comfortable living in an authoritarian state/community. The following letter to the Times from a reader responding to the United Air removal of a passenger is an example of (2).
Quote:The man was disorderly and refusing to obey airline staff and police instructions. What were the cops supposed to do? Meekly tell him to have a nice day and walk off the plane? When the police are called in most cases like this they take some kind of action. This gentleman bears the responsibility for how this scene played out.
There was another such example in the Rick Perlstein piece that hightor linked yesterday where a contemporary said about the Kent State shootings, "Those students who were shot [and killed] bear all the responsibility because they should have listened to the National Guard's orders" (paraphrased).
And we see it now in the frequent suggestions that police shootings that result in death or assaults on citizens are justified because the shootings and assaults are perpetrated by police.
It is an axiomatic (and a tautological) formulation - authorities are right
because they are authorities. And that axiomatic formulation is used by both types (1) and (2) above.