@revelette1,
Quote:President Trump’s Real-World Syria Lesson
Back during the election when Trump was saying weird nonsense about Syria, I repeatedly posted here that Trump may have been taken in by propaganda now, but Trump is no fool, and as soon as he has real world experience with Assad, Trump will quickly learn what is what.
And I was right. Trump learned just as quickly as I thought he would.
Quote:It was naïve because ISIS does not exist in a vacuum — nor is it the only bad actor in the region. ISIS was produced as a Sunni Muslim reaction to massive overreach by Iran in Iraq, where Iranian-backed Shiite militias and the Iraqi government forces of Nouri al-Maliki tried to crush all vestiges of Sunni power in that country and make it a vassal of Iran. (If you think ISIS is sick, Google the phrase “power drills to the head and Shiite militias in Iraq” and you will discover that ISIS did not invent depravity in that part of the world.)
A couple weeks ago PBS Frontline did another undercover look into Iraq to see what is up there, and bad news. The Shia are back to massacring innocent Sunnis again. Even after we destroy Islamic State, the Sunnis are going to be forced to turn to extremism again, just so they can protect themselves from the Shia.
Quote:The Iranian/Shiite onslaught against Iraqi Sunnis ran parallel with Assad’s Shiite-Alawite regime in Syria, turning what started out as a multisectarian democracy movement in Syria into a sectarian war between Sunnis and Shiites. Assad figured that if he just gunned down or poison-gassed enough Syrian Sunnis he could turn their democracy efforts into a sectarian struggle against his Shiite-Alawite regime — and presto, it worked.
Actually it is much much worse than that. Assad intentionally created Islamic State.
Assad thinks that when he bombs civilians in a region that is nowhere near Islamic State, he can just say he was attacking Islamic State and people will believe his lies.
Assad also thinks that, in the future when he is finally finished massacring innocent civilians, he can turn his attacks against Islamic State and pretend that he was fighting them all along, and people will believe those lies as well.
And Assad thinks that those who are
not fooled by his lies will nonetheless find Islamic State to be the greater evil, and will accept Assad staying in power in exchange for being rid of Islamic State.
Just speaking for myself, but it'll be a cold day in hell before I let a monster like Assad use the existence of a second monster (Islamic State) to manipulate me into accepting his crimes. Especially when the only reason that Islamic State even exists was because Assad created them, and created them with the express intent of pulling off this monstrous manipulation.
Quote:The least bad solution is a partition of Syria and the creation of a primarily Sunni protected area — protected by an international force, including, if necessary, some U.S. troops. That should at least stop the killing — and the refugee flows that are fueling a populist-nationalist backlash all across the European Union.
Considering that PBS Frontline documentary that I mentioned, breaking up Iraq might be the least-bad option too.