192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
gungasnake
 
  -4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 09:41 am
@hightor,

Quote:
Trump sees moral equivalency between the United States and a Russian regime that murders dissenting politicians in broad daylight, brutalizes its opponents, hacks into the American election, and traffics in the whopping lie. He is so beholden to, or seduced by, Vladimir Putin’s Russia that he will not murmur criticism. Enough said. This is a moral abdication of such proportions that America’s alliances are left without ideological foundation. They must then wither.


You've allowed your mind to be corrupted by globalist bullshit and so has the sorry asshole you're quoting.

Vladimir Putin would win any election you could hold in Russia with 90+ percent of the vote. He is the best leader Russia has ever had since Tsar Peter and his (internal) adversaries are leftover commies and oligarchs. His external adversaries are George Soros, Rothschilds, the vermin who have infested our state department until just now, other NWO types, neotards and other assholes.

gungasnake
 
  -4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 09:44 am
Russians were starving the day before Putin took over. They are not starving now, DESPITE the best efforts of the NWO to starve them (e.g. Saudis flooding the oil markets at US/British behest)...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvPppq7CYAAXN8r.jpg
0 Replies
 
thack45
 
  4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 09:50 am
Ah, there's nothing like a steaming pile of propaganda on a chilly Saturday morn
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  8  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 09:51 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:
Vladimir Putin would win any election you could hold in Russia with 90+ percent of the vote

Hahahaaa — I know he would. He'd threaten, jail, or kill his opposition. That's the point!
Quote:
He is the best leader Russia has ever had since Tsar Peter...

Tell that to the serfs!
Quote:
...and his (internal) adversaries are leftover commies and oligarchs.

So are his internal supporters!
Quote:
The entire business is monumentally stupid and has led to the present situation in which 57% of discretionary spending is going towards our military while our infrastructure crumbles.

And who just proposed a $54 billion increase in defense spending?

How many times are you going to post that silly picture of Putin? And isn't it about time to put that Rachel Maddow video back up, I know she's a real favorite of yours.


Below viewing threshold (view)
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:02 am
Ma Farkel, Pa Farkel, and little Sparkle Farkel.....
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:08 am
Money which has been spent on our military in recent decades has been largely spent on fat-cat projects like the F35 and on senseless NWO wars fought for the benefit of bankers and NWO ideologues and all of that has left our military in a weakened state and in desperate need of some repair.

I assume that DT and Bannon will succeed at bringing about decent relations with Russia and China and that military spending will fall below 50% of discretionary funding within two years.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:19 am
Quote:
An investigation by the New York Times released on Saturday reveals that at least five women have taken a total of $13 million in settlements after accusing top Fox News host Bill O'Reilly of sexual harassment.

In exchange for the money, the women—both his coworkers and guests on his show—have agreed not to pursue lawsuits against O'Reilly or speak publicly about their accusations. But their initial complaints about his behavior, according to the Times, included "verbal abuse, lewd comments, unwanted advances and phone calls in which it sounded like Mr. O’Reilly was masturbating, according to documents and interviews." Multiple women recorded O'Reilly's inappropriate comments to use as evidence in their cases.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/fox-sexual-harassment-o-reilly-ailes
gungasnake
 
  -4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:25 am
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4367746/WikiLeaks-says-CIA-disguised-hacking-Russian-activity.html
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:31 am

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/729767/Ice-age-prediction-sun-hibernates-global-cooling-climate-change

Question is, how long can libtards, greentards, and Malthusians keep their stupid global-warming **** up while the planet sinks into a little ice age??

All of that **** was meant to damage the economies of the world and help reduce human populations to medieval levels for the glory of "Gaia(TM)".....
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:33 am
I just watched All The President's Men again. Haven't seen it for years. I recommend everyone do the same.

I had forgotten how totally corrupted the Justice Department had become along with many in the CIA and FBI. I'd forgotten how blatantly the administration lied for years and how GOPer aligned with Nixon did whatever they could do to demonize and discredit the Washington Post.

And at that time, there was no significant rightwing media system to echo the Nixonian talking points or to forward false and misleading stories to strike at "enemies". And of course, there was nothing to match our present situation of a huge propaganda operation out of Russia to do the same. And at that point in time, the sort of operation that the Koch brothers now run was almost non-existent.
izzythepush
 
  5  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:34 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
How many times are you going to post that silly picture of Putin?


How about this one?

http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/steve_bell/2007/12/12/PUTINMEDVEDEVweb.jpg

Or this

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56316c94e4b098620a45e78a/t/56491470e4b0c64ed27c5887/1447629937177/
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  8  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:36 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:
how long can educated people keep their stupid global-warming **** up while the planet sinks into a little ice age??
because the only jerk-offs that believe your Ice Age V stories are those who believe in a Biblical Flood and Creationist crap.
ANything else you need to have explained to you??
I think you should spend most of your time trying to walk erect.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:48 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
...walk erect.
yuk, yuk, yuk....

Quote:
Define yuk: laugh — yuk in a sentence. .
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  8  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:49 am
@gungasnake,
You really must be pissed at Tweets handling of his first 71 days. I believe that we havent seen this level of brainless Incompetence since BUCHANAN .

TRUMPtards will believe anything that is printed in blogs and in newspapers smaller than 14X24
gungasnake
 
  -4  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:49 am
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  6  
Sat 1 Apr, 2017 10:52 am
@farmerman,
poor gunga's gonna be spending the whole day down thumbing almost everybody. LOL
poor sot.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.48 seconds on 04/29/2025 at 03:08:47