192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
giujohn
 
  -1  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:10 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

I'm not going to let you off that easily. You deceitfully and purposefully mis-stated what I'd said/argued and produced a really ugly personal smear. If I put you on ignore, it will be only because you now fail to acknowledge that and apologize for it. I'd rather not put you on ignore (I've never done so previously) but what you did drops below any acceptable level of discourse.

Edit: you don't even have to apologize. Just acknowledge it.


Put on ignore by a looney liberal=badge of honor.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -1  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:11 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

I use Gallup, and they show 40% today. That's surprising because of the recent revelation on Trump's charge against the Clinton's were determined to be false.
Add to that Trump's five year challenge on Obama's birthplace, and his constant lies.


Gallup hasn't been taken seriously in quite awhile...And will be out if that business soon.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -1  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:13 pm
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

blatham wrote:

I'm not going to let you off that easily. You deceitfully and purposefully mis-stated what I'd said/argued and produced a really ugly personal smear. If I put you on ignore, it will be only because you now fail to acknowledge that and apologize for it.


Apologize for it? You attempted to dismiss the rape of a 14 year old girl by 2 people that shouldn't have even been in the same country as her, much less the same school by suggesting that "we should compare the number of rapes of young women committed by high school and college sports dudes." As though that 14 year old girl really give a **** about rape statistics or who else could have raped her. I guess she was lucky that at least the illegals won't have expensive lawyers. I mean unless the sanctuary people are going to crowd source one for them. They are the best and brightest, right?

You took a discussion of what could have been about the various ideas of sanctuary cities and states and turned it in to a "Yeah, but look, they do it too! White Americans are just as bad as the illegal immigrants!" discussion. You want to lessen the impact of illegal immigrants committing violent crimes because that makes the ideas of sanctuary cities look stupid. Who in their right mind would want to give someone like that sanctuary?

Now, you want me to apologize or you will stop reading my posts?! I say **** off and have a nice day.




BRAVO!
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -2  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:14 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

It's not the hole I'm worried about; it's how long he remains president.


That would be 8 years.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -2  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:17 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
Not worthy of the attention of serious people.
There's a lot of serious people kicking about here. I report, they decide.


Report my ass...You cut and paste for the appearance of being intellectual.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:20 pm
Quote:
The Koch brothers' network of well-funded outside groups says it will spend millions to protect Republicans who oppose the party's health care bill from political fallout.

Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Partners, the Koch network's big-budget grassroots activism and advertising groups, are teaming up to create a "seven-figure" reserve fund to support lawmakers who buck President Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan on the health care vote, as the threat of primaries looms over some opponents of the bill. The Koch groups will spend the money on paid media, direct mail and grassroots canvassing.

Freedom Partners called the GOP bill "Obamacare 2.0" and said it falls short of truly repealing the 2010 law.
Politico
I think this is essentially a declaration of war on Trumpcare. And on Trump.
giujohn
 
  0  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:22 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Quote:
Don't you get it, your majority do you matter.


Where did you learn English? Trump University? LOL


Wow... You're laughing at an auto correct? How superficial are you?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  5  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:24 pm
@blatham,
So the sumbitches want a clean sweep of healthcare. Nothing for anybody, except, probably the same tax cuts for the wealthy.
ossobucotemp
 
  3  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:40 pm
@edgarblythe,
Bought and paid for.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  4  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:49 pm
@edgarblythe,
well the poor will get the same tax cuts.They will get amazing tx cuts
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 07:57 pm
@farmerman,
They deserve those amazing tx cuts, because they're the ones who got Trump voted in.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 08:18 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
So the sumbitches want a clean sweep of healthcare. Nothing for anybody, except, probably the same tax cuts for the wealthy.

Tax cuts at the upper end, for sure. But tax cuts everywhere so as to "starve the beast". And they want pretty much every piece of progressive legislation since the 30s eviscerated. Citizen government stands in the path of their desire to have business (particularly their businesses) running the show.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 08:26 pm
Quote:
CNN just dropped a bombshell report about President Donald Trump’s potential ties to Russia:

Quote:
The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign, US officials told CNN.

There are a lot of unanswered questions in this. Who were the Trump associates and Russian officials? How exactly did these different people communicate and possibly coordinate? Is CNN’s report even reliable, given that it cites anonymous US officials?

But the report, if true, is big.
Vox
So at this point, it's tentative. But given the number of lunatics and incompetents around this administration, and given the myriad connections with Russia and given Russia's involvement in the election to get Trump into the WH rather than Clinton, it's certainly possible.

What happens to the GOP if this continues to steadily get worse? What happens inside Trump's head?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 08:29 pm
@blatham,
Nothing happens to the GOP. They'll throw Trump under the truck.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 08:53 pm
View from (what little sanity remains in) the left: Rachel Maddow totally unhinged:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLf3Wtcw60o

cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 09:21 pm
@gungasnake,
You got that backwards; Trump is unhinged. As more negative news about Trump gets exposed, his approval rating is going to be the lowest in history.
Trump wanted to put his name on the White House in neon lights, but he's going to consider a gopher hole instead. The sign by that hole is going to be "Scion."
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  4  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 09:26 pm
Andy Borowitz

The one part of Trump's presidency I'm looking forward to is the sentencing phase.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 09:28 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
hightor wrote:
oralloy wrote:
If Trump repudiates the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty then we can expand our arsenal to whatever size we want, right?

Yeah — and if we're really lucky he may even get a chance to use it!

And it also gives the green light to other countries, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Venezuela to develop their own nuclear weapons.

Then we'll need a LOT of nukes so that we can redundantly target all of our enemies simultaneously.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  3  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 09:29 pm
Whats really hilarious is Nunes running around Washington screaming see I told you Obama was spying on Trumps campaign, without mentioning they came across it while recording foreign communists who were colluding with Trump activists.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 22 Mar, 2017 09:32 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
How long before ordinary civilians come to the conclusion that next to the US, IS is the lesser of two evils? It's tactics like this that lost the war in Vietnam.

What lost the war in Vietnam was that after our military had successfully eradicated the Vietcong and South Vietnam was on a course for independence from Communist domination, the American Democratic Party sold out South Vietnam by cutting off all their aid and supplies.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.92 seconds on 02/12/2025 at 02:17:09