@blatham,
Please read more carefully. The controversy over the Russian hacking most significantly involves the abuses of power and responsibility by Hillary Clinton, her campaign organization and the DNC. That the Russians or anyone else might have hacked them isn't either surprising or particularly interesting. Indeed the reckless, self serving actions that created the vulnerability to that hacking is itself a central element of the real problem here.
The apparently undisputed fact that the hacking occurred gives the lie to Hillary's continued protestations that no lapse in security occurred as a result of her deliberate attempt to evade the requirements of the FOIA Act, and policies she herself issued to all State Department employees, by putting all her e mail correspondence (much - despite her denials - containing classified information} on an unsecured personal server.
The information leaked provides some element of confirmation to previously substantiated allegations of collusion between the Clinton campaign, the media and the DNC in corrupting processes involved in both the Democrat primary and the final election. No substantive denials or counter information have yet been issued by any of those accused. Instead they all have tried very hard to change the subject and turn it on some irrelevasnt comments by Trump. This is an obvious attempt to deceive and distract, that itself would be as admissable evidence of conspiracy in a court of law
Most of the mainstream media coverage has followed this deceptive effort and focused on Trump's comments. You too here are evading the central point, and merely following their lead.
The real issue here is that one candidate did, by her own actions make herself highly vulnerable to this stuff. I appreciate your slavish attention to the Democrat effort to distract attention from itself and the other perpetrators here. However, I reject your efforts as mere weak evasions of obvious facts..
