monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

What part of Blathems citation of some of Krugmans work is bullshit?

The purpose is to support your charge against the Clintons.

Can you say Corporatocracy?

What charge would that be, C I? That they took money from anyone, in a pay-for-play scenario? How many links would you like to see?

It was tantamount to her loss, both ways.

Here's the Top Ten Pay to Play scandals for your erudition, C I .

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/24/clintons-top-10-pay-play-allegations/

The delusion runs deep on both sides but that is nothing at all new. They just switch seats every four to eight years, one group goes into the peanut gallery and one collects the peanuts and puts them in a bag for when it is their turn.

listening..

The crowning of this particular person was so complete, prior to the election, that even seasoned punters were caught off guard.

Just show just a couple. The worst ones.

Trump's tax form leaked...He paid 38 million ******* dollars on 150 million dollar income????

25 ******* percent???

Guess all the hysterical ******* liberal assholes screaming about some imaginary conspiracy must feel like real ******* dipshits...But it's real hard to feel sorry for them when their motivation is to invent anything that will force a constitutional crisis in hopes of removing a legitimately elected president from office even if it destroys the economy or jeopardizes our national safety. ******* Snowflakes...Can't wait for the warmth of spring.

Guess that radical lesbian bitch Rachel Maddow has finally been shown to be what we have always known her to be...A ******* ****.

I find the similarities to Watergate unsettling. Do you remember when Martha Mitchell was the laughing stock because of her phone calls to reporters? People giggled themselves silly because ol Martha would call reporters and tell them about bags of money and creepy behavior of her husband (and other Nixon stooges) while whispers swirled over what the plumbers were really up to. I was so young at the time, and I just wasn't sure what to think. But Martha's antics caught my attention and worried me. Why would the wife of the Attorney General call reporters and risk being called a drunk or crackpot? I think the corruption in this administration is very different than the corruption in Nixon's. More later.

Is there a scale of corruption to measure such things?

Absolutely no evidence has been found to show Russia influenced the presidential election.

There IS now evidence to show NBC did attempt to influence the election by surreptitiously leaking their decade old Access Hollywood tape to their competition, the Washington Post 2 days before the debate.

Where is the investigation into this???

Nothing to say cheese eaters?? Of course not. (Nothing but crickets)

There is now, and always has been, voluminous evidence to show that all these troubles you are ranting about, all the lies and deception, all the false accusations, all the crime, all the perfidy, all the murders, all the rapes, all the thieving all the ... are so intricately bound up in this whole stinking morass that is the USA.

Stand for the Truth: A Government Researcher Speaks Out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvAv-114bwM

Oh please...Take your ridiculous 911 conspiracy and go tell it to the idiots who believe we never went to the moon and the UFO/AREA 51 nutburgers.

Love your facts, guijohn. As good as always.

It's not just the lies of 9-11. There is a long history of US lies to get you folks ranting and raving about killing the next [racial slur].

I love that your behavior has made conversing with you so odious that only camlock will even try. Match made in heaven. Two sides of the same coin.

Enjoy your bed

You are conversing with guijohn.

You don't understand the connection between Donald Trump and 9-11, maporsche. Why don't you get yourself up to speed?

Rachel Maddog here to show us the light.,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9Z4W-rbWQI