192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 03:25 am
Republicans move closer to Neo Nazis.

Quote:
Senior Republican congressman Steve King has sparked a backlash on social media after tweeting his support for the Dutch anti-Islam politician, Geert Wilders.

"Wilders understands that culture and demographics are our destiny," Mr King wrote on Twitter.

"We can't restore our civilisation with somebody else's babies," he added.
The outrage from Democratic politicians and commentators across the political spectrum was quick, ferocious and entirely expected. The bluntness of Mr King's message, the talk of "our destiny" and "other people's babies", ensured a vigorous response.

Of greater interest will be how Republican officeholders handle the controversy. So far they have remained silent. That may be increasingly difficult, as this is yet another indication of the growing bonds between the Trump wing of the Republican Party and white nationalist movements in Europe.

Breitbart, the conservative media outlet recently headed by White House senior advisor Steve Bannon, often sings the praises of Mr Wilders, as well as France's Marine Le Pen and Frauke Petry, leader of the Alternative for Germany Party.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39250251
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 04:02 am
Fake News and Veles, Macedonia
Quote:
In the final weeks of the US presidential election, Veles attained a weird infamy in the most powerful nation on earth; stories in The Guardian and on BuzzFeed revealed that the Macedonian town of 55,000 was the registered home of at least 100 pro-Trump websites, many of them filled with sensationalist, utterly fake news. (The imminent criminal indictment of Hillary Clinton was a popular theme; another was the pope’s approval of Trump.) The sites’ ample traffic was rewarded handsomely by automated advertising engines, like Google’s AdSense. An article in The New Yorker described how President Barack Obama himself spent a day in the final week of the campaign talking “almost obsessively” about Veles and its “digital gold rush.”

Within Veles itself, the young entrepreneurs behind these websites became subjects of tantalizing intrigue. Between August and November, Boris earned nearly $16,000 off his two pro-Trump websites. The average monthly salary in Macedonia is $371...
https://www.wired.com/2017/02/veles-macedonia-fake-news/
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 04:05 am
@blatham,
The Macedonians aren't supporting Trump's ideology, they're making money out of it.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 04:46 am
The robber baron only cares about getting its snout in the trough. That's why it creates a fiction about a top heavy bureaucracy. The truth is every country needs bureaucrats, they keep government running, we need passports, driving licences, proper building regulations, all manner of things. And most bureaucrats are hard working, diligent people. The image of a top heavy living high on the hog at the tax payer's expense and doing very little work is a lie.

It's a very nasty lie because the robber baron isn't bothered about bureaucracy it's bothered about government. Government makes sure the working man gets a decent wage, safe working conditions, proper holiday pay, sick pay and medical cover. The robber baron doesn't want any of that because it costs. All it's interested in is getting its snout in the trough, and staff welfare gets in the way of that.

So it perpetrates the myth of the bloated bureaucracy, of some people getting something for nothing so it can divide and rule the working classes and suck the life blood out of the worker. Unfortunately some lickspittles are stupid enough to buy into that myth.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 05:25 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Conway paid dearly for getting hooked up with Trump. She used to enjoy high respect in DC until she became the spokesperson for ly,n Trump.

Oh nonsense. The fact that liberal has-beens are crying and throwing a tantrum doesn't mean she isn't respected.
thack45
 
  3  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 06:12 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
Oh nonsense. The fact that liberal has-beens are crying and throwing a tantrum doesn't mean she isn't respected.

http://rhrealitycheck.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/false-stamp.png
oralloy
 
  -1  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 06:38 am
@thack45,
thack45 wrote:
http://rhrealitycheck.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/false-stamp.png

One of the nicest things about reality is, no matter how much liberals deny it, reality just keeps on being true.
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 06:54 am
@izzythepush,
Yup, in this case recounted here that is so.
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 07:16 am
You'll want to read this TPM piece on the CBO because Republicans are already mounting a disinformation campaign (as they expect scoring that doesn't match their rhetoric/promises).
Quote:
...The current head of the CBO is Keith Hall, a conservative, anti-regulation economist who worked for the Bush administration. Still, the CBO analysis of the Republican bill to repeal the ACA is expected to find that between six and 15 million people will lose their health insurance if it is passed and implemented, due to a combination of cuts to Medicaid, reduced subsidies for lower income people to buy private insurance, and the repeal of the individual mandate.

As Republican lawmakers attack the agency's reputation, budget experts from across the political spectrum have been rallying to its defense.

"The office is genuinely non-partisan and seeks to make sure its estimates are grounded in research literature," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who led the agency under President George W. Bush, worked on Mitt Romney's 2008 campaign and now leads the conservative American Action Forum. "Both Republicans and Democrats have led the office, and the work is always of the same high quality."

"They’re the ultimate budget wonks," added Stan Collender, a former top staffer on the House and Senate budget committees who worked for both Republicans and Democrats. "They produce the closest thing you’re going to get to facts in Washington. The Office of Management and Budget is good, but it’s in their interest to protect the White House. The CBO is only there to get the numbers right."
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/cbo-obamacare-american-health-care-act
georgeob1
 
  0  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 07:39 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Corn based ethanol is just another example of a boondoggle, in this case a bipartisan one specifically crafted to appeal to a reliable block of farm state voters. A rational energy policy would subject legislation to a cost/benefit analysis and consider choices using a scientific rather than a political calculus.

Precisely the same can be said of our government subsidies, tax credits and mandated purchases of wind and solar power producers & manufacturers. Do you remember Solynra ?
hightor wrote:

Quote:
Government subsidized student loans have yielded rapidly increasing tuition costs(...)

While government loan subsidies play a part in the steady rise of higher education costs, they are as much a correlation as a cause. The loan subsidies were, at first, a response to widely-shared concerns about college becoming unaffordable. Inflationary forces were already at work.
That's not the whole story. The Obama Education department was busy mandating ("suggesting" ) new university "managers" for favored social positions and new university overhead structures to enforce them (with the implied threat of withholding grant to those who didn't respond,; granting more to those who did; while attacking new for profit schools and universities that compete with established ones and in many cases provide more economically useful skills to those who need them. College loans fuelled the rise in prices and university tuitions and the subsequent the Federal takeover of these loans with the implied subsidies and loan forgiveness, created a bubble in demand and prices just as did the same policies in an already inflating housing market in 2006.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  0  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 07:44 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Like so many of these swamp creatures, she's now into the big bucks by being a parasite in the land of right wing con jobs. But I can't imagine anyone who would behave as she is now has an innocent or ethical past.


Now there's a reasoned, fact-based argument utterly devoid of vague implications, name-calling, or rather wild, sweeping speculation.

"Political analysis" or girlish gossip?
layman
 
  0  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:11 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Quote:
....between six and 15 million people will lose their health insurance if it is passed and implemented, due to... the repeal of the individual mandate.

Lemme see if I got this straight, eh? If you don't FORCE them to buy it, people will "lose" their health insurance?

So, I guess if I don't buy a new BMW, then I have "lost" a car, that the idea?

Mebbe I got more better things to do with my money than buy shitty insurance, eh? They send me a medical bill, I'll just declare bankruptcy. **** them thievin insurance companies, ya know?
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:21 am
@georgeob1,
Yeah, george. Ms "Alternate Facts" is a real moral exemplar.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:22 am
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

"Political analysis" or girlish gossip?


Like, the girlishiest, eh?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:23 am
Quote:
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) talked to conservative host Hugh Hewitt on Friday about the Republicans' health care plan, and the GOP leader conceded that his party is "never going to win a coverage beauty contest" with Democrats. He added that Republicans' goal is "not to win some coverage beauty contest."

It was a curious choice of words. We are, after all, talking about American families having health security, not some meaningless pageant. What's more, the GOP congressman seemed to be implicitly conceding that his derided plan will be inferior to the Affordable Care Act when it comes to the most basic goal of health reform: ensuring that Americans have coverage.

And that's ultimately where Republicans are likely to run into the most trouble. Love "Obamacare" or hate it, the ACA has succeeded in its principal goal: bringing consumers health insurance. It's not an accident that the nation's uninsured rate is now the lowest it's ever been. The Republican plan, meanwhile, is projected to take coverage away from between 6 million and 15 million Americans. The Congressional Budget Office's tally will shed additional light on the subject, and it may come as early as today.
Benen
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:32 am
@layman,
Quote:
So, I guess if I don't buy a new BMW, then I have "lost" a car, that the idea?


OK, that was a bad example, I admit it.

What I should have said was that if I don't pay the PRICE of a new BMW for a rusty-ass, broken-down 25 year old Pinto with a busted block and a stripped transmission, then I have "lost" a car (the pinto), eh?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:42 am
Now that the stupid-ass hosers have declared their intention to let anybody and everybody into their "country" (such as it is), we're gunna have to take measures to keep ISIS savages from pouring in here from across the Canadian border, eh?

When you weigh the respective costs and benefits, obviously invasion and conquest is about 20 times more effective and affordable than building a wall on the hoser border, eh?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:44 am
Rude? Be nice?
Quote:
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
It is amazing how rude much of the media is to my very hard working representatives. Be nice, you will do much better!
5:52 AM - 13 Mar 2017

A curious set of terms and standards for our boy to toss out this morning. It gets one thinking...

Grabbing women by the pussy - nice or rude?
Personally demeaning each competitor for the GOP nom. - nice or rude?
Refraining from a lie one day out of 50 since taking office - nice or rude?
Defrauding hundreds of people with a fake university - nice or rude?
Posting a picture of Ted Cruz's wife looking like a shrew - nice or rude?
Chumming around with Mafiosi - nice or rude?
Referring to independent media as "enemy of the people" - nice or rude?
Running a patently deceitful campaign re Obama's birth cert - nice or rude?

Aside from all that (and there's so much more), this fellow seems to imagine that the press ought to serve him rather than report on him critically in all the many ways where critical reporting is absolutely proper. Or, more likely, he thinks that if he can badger and bully enough he'll get a compliant media to serve him. And if that doesn't work, then at least he can continue to convince his base of malformed brains that he's a victim and that they must turn to right wing media to learn the real truth. Unfortunately, that last one seems to be working.
layman
 
  -1  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:46 am
@blatham,
Quote:
Or, more likely, he thinks that if he can badger and bully enough he'll get a compliant media to serve him. And if that doesn't work, then at least he can continue to convince his base of malformed brains that he's a victim and that they must turn to right wing media to learn the real truth. Unfortunately, that last one seems to be working.


Exactly. It's sheer brilliance, eh?
layman
 
  -1  
Mon 13 Mar, 2017 08:53 am
@layman,
When you administer a curb-biting beatdown to a bully, you accomplish two things:

1. You put a piece of trash in the garbage dumpster where it belongs, and

2. You gain the gratitude and allegiance of the people who always hated that damn bully--virtually everyone, that is.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 11:48:59