monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

@Rebelofnj,

You’ve not been here as long as some of us.

You wouldn’t be the first one who tried to get Oralloy to have a normal conversation.

We all have.

0 Replies

Funny, the only outlets talking about a blackout at the White House so far are the demented right wing nut sites. They’re saying the blackout is part of the next step of Trump’s plan to stay in power.

Anyone see any above-board news outlets talking about a current power outage at the WH?

1 Reply

0 Replies

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GgXn99zfd0LR/

0 Replies

@snood,

I’ve not seen anything on the BBC or Guardian.

1 Reply

I haven't seen anything either, except that the Vatican went dark and the FBI arrested the pope on an 80-count indictment for child-trafficking.

Vatican blackout actually faulty camera

1 Reply

@hightor,

🙄

0 Replies

@Leadfoot,

Leadfoot wrote:

If you deny a forum internet access, you have effectively banned them.

What conservatives need to do is set up shop on Russian servers.

Mr. Putin is eager to help the American people resist and undermine the Biden Administration, and I'm sure he'd be happy to have a large segment of the American population discussing the resistance on Russian servers.

1 Reply

@hightor,

That's pretty funny.

0 Replies

@Rebelofnj,

Rebelofnj wrote:

I'm kind of hoping Oralloy would improve in their responses, instead of saying the same 10 or so phases, word for word, for weeks/months.

You can't improve on perfection.

Rebelofnj wrote:

I expected more from a purported genius like Oralloy.

I don't reject the label, but I've never called myself a genius, and I've made it clear that I'm not calling myself a genius.

1 Reply

@Leadfoot,

Leadfoot wrote:

Quote:
For those people who think the Twitter or Facebook bannings were illegal...

...they must also think the banning of individual posters in Internet forums is illegal also.

Why?

Now here is a truly false analogy.

We are talking about banning ANY forum that allows actual free speech.

i.e., Parler

You should be clear here.

“Banning any forum that allows unmoderated provocations of violence”

All of these “bans” would be avoided if Parler agreed to remove and discourage violence. It’s that easy.

You agree?

1 Reply

QAnon predictions never pan out, none of them are ever remotely true, but a true MAGAT mark never looks back.
They never consider that their entire information pipeline is poisoned and corrupted by raw fear.
They just keep mainlining the poison - why? Maybe because the fear makes them feel alive. And they try to spread it all around.

0 Replies

@snood
Snopes has now debunked the taser/balls story

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

Hey Izzy - remember a couple of weeks ago when I was saying I didn’t see how we were NOT going to see some real violence from the MAGATS in the days before inauguration?

Do you remember you saying they were basically all bluster?

Just checking.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

https://sciencetrends.com/what-is-the-genius-iq-level/

Quote:

What is the Genius IQ Level? A score of over 140 is considered a genius or near genius. There is a lot of talk about IQ tests but not many people understand what the scores actually mean...

We are talking about people like Albert Einstein, who was supposed to have had an IQ score of about 160...

A score of 165-179 would denote high genius

1 Reply

@vikorr,

Has Ollie ever posted anything that could be considered genius level?

2 Replies

@Builder,

Quote:

Quite probably the most idiotic analogy I've ever seen, Hinge.

How so? I know you aren't new to A2K and this particular thread has some doozies.

0 Replies

@RABEL222,

I was replying to this:

Quote:

but I've never called myself a genius, and I've made it clear that I'm not calling myself a genius.

0 Replies

@Leadfoot,

Leadfoot wrote:

Quote:
Some of the stuff on Parler is disgusting. People saying that those who voted for Biden should watch their children being skinned alive in front of them.

That’s the sort of thing you are supporting, messages like that.

Who was it that said 'I will fight you to death for what you do, but I will fight to the death for your right to say anything.'

I might have paraphrased that but you get what the idea is, even over there. Or not.

Actually no one ever said that, it's really a piss poor version of the actual saying. Look it up, hopefully you will learn something. I actually think it's a dangerous thing to alter was was once a noble statement into a ridiculous death match motto.

1 Reply

@RABEL222,

RABEL222 wrote:

Has Ollie ever posted anything that could be considered genius level?

ahahahahahahahahaaaaaahahahahahahah gasp....youre killing me..hahashahahahahahaha

No he never posted anything close to genius, but plenty of things to attract the FBI.

1 Reply

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know