@Leadfoot,
Quote:
I submit that it is a perfect analogy.
Well, you changed it from pens and parchment to public square bulletin board and that's an improvement. But the truth is, they didn't have an internet or anything remotely like it. There's a qualitative difference between gawking at a bulletin board or reading a mimeographed speech and spreading and consuming information online. The medium is at least part of the message.
Quote:If you ban internet access, you are effectively removing their right to speak publicly.
Leaving aside the matter of incitement to commit political violence, they still have the
right to speak publicly. They aren't being prosecuted. But they don't have the right to force a privately-owned platform to post this speech. They can either find a platform that is willing to carry their content, create one, or use other media outlets like newspapers, TV, or radio.