192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 21 Feb, 2017 10:07 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
My god. A bit of sanity in an otherwise insane point in time.

More evidence that liberals hate America's Constitution and our Freedom.


Quote:
Appeals Court Rules that Second Amendment Doesn’t Protect Right to Assault Weapons

Once Trump makes a few appointments to the Supreme Court, that will be decisively overturned.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Tue 21 Feb, 2017 10:09 pm
@camlok,
camlok wrote:
So your erroneous notion "It shows that those who have "ruled" know nothing about guns or how they function" has no merit.

Either those judges don't know anything about guns, or they don't know anything about the Constitution, or they are maliciously allowing the Constitution to be violated.

I'm guessing it's all three at once.

At any rate, after Trump replaces a number of Leftist justices on the Supreme Court, this ruling will be decisively overturned.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  5  
Tue 21 Feb, 2017 11:07 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote Baldimo:
Quote:
When I went to college back in the mid 90's, "black power" was the in thing. Do you recall the dashiki and the leather "Africa" medallion? They weren't new when I was in school and they won't be new in 5 years when they come back into "resistance style",


A. Sincerely, what percentage of black students you saw in a day wore a dashiki? 5%? 10%?

B. What's wrong with a dashiki? College is a place where students can think and explore, what is so bad about exploring one's heritage? Especially considering the suppression of black American history from the history books for so many years. Rediscovering and publicizing that is a legitimate academic pursuit.

C. How does the wearing of dashikis indicate that intellectual activity is not going on?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 01:59 am
Quote:
...15-year-old Sergio Hernandez was just steps from the border on Mexican soil when he was killed in 2010 by Jesus Mesa Jr., an agent standing on the American side in El Paso, Texas.

The federal agent was not prosecuted, and the U.S. refused to extradite him to Mexico.


Yeah, so? Turns out, now the kid's family is now trying to come to the U.S. and sue in American Courts. The case is being heard by the Supreme Court.

Quote:
The issues for the court are whether the officer enjoys immunity from such claims of excessive force, and whether the victim enjoyed limited constitutional protections, even though he was not a U.S. citizen.

"This an urgent matter of separation of powers for us to respect the duty that the principle rule the executive and the legislative have with respect to foreign affairs," said Justice Anthony Kennedy. "This is one of the most sensitive areas of foreign affairs where the political branches should discuss with Mexico what the solution ought to be."


Don't sound like Kennedy would uphold the Ninth Circuit's attempt to dictate foreign affairs, eh?

The border agent says the kid was throwing rocks at him. I suspect Trump would simply say that Mexico has a duty to do more to control their lawless citizens, and dismiss the whole question.

Juarez is full of criminals who attack El Paso from the Mexican side of the border. And there have been over 300 documented incursions by the Mexican Army itself, 152 of them involving armed troops, since 2004, including a Mexican helicopter which fired at border patrol agents.

Gorsuch will be on the Court by the time this gets decided so I wouldn't be placing any bets on the kid's family, ya know?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 02:50 am
Here's what ya get when ya aint go no border wall, eh?

Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 03:41 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
Here's what ya get when ya aint go no border wall, eh?
We had the same situation here - but even with strongest border controls agents on the wall ...

http://i.imgur.com/HEQVN6l.jpg

... people just ignored that ...

http://i.imgur.com/bUEdOyu.jpg

All cheese eaters, eh?
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 03:52 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
From what I've heard, the military has seen an increase in both size and intelligence in soldiers going through basic training compared to 30-40 years ago.

Ah, the all-volunteer army. The troops are bigger, smarter, and a hell of a lot more trainable. I almost felt sorry for the NCOs trying to ride herd over the collection of little, dumb, recalcitrant draftees they had to work with back in the day. But there were still some good things about the "citizen army".
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 04:21 am
@farmerman,
Just googled him. I see the similarity.

http://c8.alamy.com/comp/EFJJ4W/newspaper-advertisement-cutting-from-the-late-1930s-early-1940s-for-EFJJ4W.jpg
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  7  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 04:54 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
More evidence that liberals hate America's Constitution and our Freedom.

More evidence of the problems that occur when an 18th Century anachronism becomes enshrined and firearms become a fetish for the fearful.

But seriously, constitutional interpretation aside, why are military-styled weapons, which are designed to throw out a lot of lead (inaccurately) in a short period of time necessary for purposes of self-defense? Why start a civilian arms race? Actually it's well under way, but why promote it?
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 05:36 am
@camlok,
At least as late as Dec 2015
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 05:44 am
Another bit of sanity
Quote:
A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked Texas from cutting off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, ruling the state had presented no credible evidence to support claims the organization violated medical or ethical standards related to abortion procedures.
NYT
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 05:52 am
Quote:
Prosecutors in Ukraine are investigating whether a member of Parliament committed treason by working with two associates of President Trump’s to promote a plan for settling Ukraine’s conflicts with Russia.

In a court filing on Tuesday, prosecutors accused the lawmaker, Andrii V. Artemenko, of conspiring with Russia to commit “subversive acts against Ukraine,” in particular by advancing a proposal that could “legitimize the temporary occupation” of the Crimean peninsula. Russia forcibly annexed the peninsula in 2014, a step that Ukraine, the United States and other governments have refused to recognize; Mr. Artemenko said his proposal would allow Ukraine to formally cede control of the territory to Russia, at least temporarily

...Mr. Artemenko traveled to New York in January to discuss the plan with Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, and with Felix H. Sater, a Russian-American business associate of the Trump Organization who scouted business opportunities in Russia for the company as recently as 2015. Mr. Cohen said he delivered the proposal to the White House in a sealed envelope in early February.
NYT
More than a tad bizarre, all this.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 06:16 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Why start a civilian arms race? Actually it's well under way, but why promote it?

To make money. What else?
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 06:20 am
@Olivier5,
Yup. That's the key motivation in this. And this includes NRA biggies who get paid a million a year, personally.
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 06:23 am
Weigel and Costa on CPAC.
Quote:
The conservative movement in America now belongs to President Trump.

Thousands of activists will arrive in Washington this week for an annual gathering that will vividly display how Trump has pushed the Republican Party
and the conservative movement toward an “America first” nationalism that has long existed on the fringes.

“Every movement that gets dusty or sclerotic relies on an infusion of energy from the bottom up,” said White House counselor Kellyanne Conway. “It also takes a transformative individual to bring about change".

...Former House speaker Newt Gingrich, a Trump ally who has given a series of speeches recently on “Trumpism,” said he is “impressed that CPAC has very intelligently anticipated the direction that Trump is going to take the country and understood that he’ll be the dominant voice on the right for the foreseeable future.”
WP
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 07:05 am
Alyssa Rosenberg at the WP gets this right
Quote:
In keeping with the broader themes of our political moment, Yiannopoulos is less a conservative than a fellow traveler who vexes liberals for profit.

Yiannopoulos’s embrace of the Gamergate backlash against the diversity movement in video games helped make him a media figure in the United States, but it seemed like a canny calculation rather than a genuine commitment. His outrageous statements about everything from Jewish control of the media to the Black Lives Matter movement to transgender people have long seemed less the product of a genuine worldview than a search for buttons to press, accompanying the jabs with naughty snickers. To regard him as genuinely politically conservative requires ignorance of conservative principles. To see his act as outrageous rather than derivative requires an unfamiliarity with subjects including art and gay history.

...The real currency of Yiannopoulos’s tour wasn’t speaking fees. It was ginning up the protests that would make for flashy documentary footage and stoking the controversy that has made someone like Ann Coulter a right-wing publishing mainstay. If the entire case for your importance is that you make a certain class of people angry, then you have to keep making those people angry, upping the rhetorical ante all the way, to preserve the sense that you are “dangerous” and thus capable of moving books and movie tickets.
WP
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  0  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 07:08 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:
More evidence that liberals hate America's Constitution and our Freedom.

More evidence of the problems that occur when an 18th Century anachronism becomes enshrined and firearms become a fetish for the fearful.

But seriously, constitutional interpretation aside, why are military-styled weapons, which are designed to throw out a lot of lead (inaccurately) in a short period of time necessary for purposes of self-defense? Why start a civilian arms race? Actually it's well under way, but why promote it?


Ugh, on phone so pardon typos etc.

When they wrote 1st amendment they did so with quill and ink. They obviously didn't have the internet in mind so the govt should obviously be able to curtail both freedom of speech and press on thevinternet, right?
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 07:19 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
In a court filing on Tuesday, prosecutors accused the lawmaker, Andrii V. Artemenko, of conspiring with Russia to commit “subversive acts against Ukraine,”
NYT
More than a tad bizarre, all this.


For some reason, God only know what, but *some* reason, ya left this part out, eh, Blathy?

Quote:
Mr. Artemenko...has not been arrested or formally charged with a crime. The Ukrainian news outlet Strana.ua quoted him as saying that the investigation was “politically motivated.” He has also claimed to have evidence of corruption that could help lead to the ouster of the Ukrainian president, Petro O. Poroshenko.

“I’m not going anywhere, and will meet with investigators to explain my position,” he was quoted as saying.


Go figure, eh?

0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 07:29 am
Finally some reason comes to the white house:

Quote:
The Trump administration is working to undo an Obama-era directive that allows students to use school restrooms that correspond with their gender identity, the White House said Tuesday.

The White House will insist that schools must protect all students and the undoing of the directive “does not diminish the protections" available to all students.

... one state-- North Carolina-- has enacted a law restricting students' bathroom access to their sex at birth. Other states are considering following suit.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 22 Feb, 2017 07:34 am
@McGentrix,
@hightor
Apparently, constitutional interpretation will not be set aside. But it can't be for gun fans. It's all they have. Which is why I'm now offering to American consumers a pocket-sized nuclear device, the iNuke.

Yesterday, I was re-reading some of Corey Robins' The Reactionary Mind. One passage, on Scalia, is very smart. (p. 146)
Quote:
Second, there's an elective affinity, even a tight fit, between the originalism of duresse oblige and Scalia's idea of the game. And that is Scalia's vision of what the good life entails: a daily and arduous struggle, where the only surety, if we leave things well enough alone, is that the strong shall win and the weak shall lose. Scalia, it turns out, is not nearly the iconoclast he thinks he is. Far from telling "people what they don't like to hear," as he claims, he tells the power elite exactly what they want to hear: that they are superior and that they have a seat at the table because they are superior.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 07:39:06