monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

After Biden is inaugurated, you going to keep on posting “Bye Bye Biden”?

He’ll probably go into the garden to eat worms.

the courts now reject your premises by something like 40 to zero. You're not gonna win.

Lets say that a very, very small percentage of votes were switched by a machine from Trump to Biden, as per your link where it says "A witness at a Georgia Senate hearing said an analysis of a Dominion voting machine found it flipped 37 votes in a tiny Georgia county from President Trump to Joe Biden."[/i]. The issue is the same report provides only half the information needed to form an objective opinion - ie. the report does not say "and Zero votes were flipped by the machine from Biden to Trump" (or in any case how many votes were flipped from Biden to Trump. Without this information - which they people auditing would have known, there is no way to know if the machine error affected the results. They had to know this, but deliberately chose to reveal only half the information needed to make an informed decision...yet again...

the machine error

In GA case the auditors have been state employees working for a corrupt secretary of state. This half information bullshit is a strawman

Quote:

In GA case the auditors have been state employees working for a corrupt secretary of state. This half information bullshit is a strawman

Well, I presumed the people auditing also presented the evidence to court - considering courts usually want the person who did a thing to give the testimony.

If the person who did the audit was a state employee giving evidence, then I've no doubt they provided both figures...and your reporting source is leaving out the other necessary 1/2 of the information.

No matter how you look at it, your sources of information keep providing only 1/2 the necessary information.

No they won't/ you are not going to win.

Well you are wrong. In both cases it is just SOS saying it, the audit, was done and nothing was found. I have not seen that in court. That is because judges are preventing it getting to court. Which is strange considering Democrats have nothing to hide.

Rep. Mo Brooks: ‘Momentum Is Building Strongly in Favor of Fighting Various State Submissions of Electoral College Votes’

Brooks said momentum was building for his effort in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“On the House side, momentum is building strongly in favor of fighting various state submissions of Electoral College votes. To mention a few — Nevada, Georgia, Pennsylvania. It is quite clear, based on overwhelming evidence, that Donald Trump if the law was obeyed, if only lawful votes cast by American citizens were counted, Donald Trump easily won those three states. And as the evidence comes out to a larger and larger degree, the public is, of course, starting to react. They’re starting to better understand this voter fraud and election theft crisis that we’re in. And they’re demanding that their congressmen and senators help clean up our election system. Part of that cleanup is making sure that those who try to steal elections do not profit from it. So, it is moving in the right direction.”

According to Brooks, when it is time for Congress to certify a Joe Biden victory on January 6, he will challenge the results if he can find a Republican from the U.S. Senate to join him in the effort.

He based the strategy on what is laid out in the Constitution.

“A lot of people don’t understand,” Brooks explained. “They think the courts resolve these disputes. That is false, OK? Courts can influence the outcome, no question like they did in the year 2000. But in the United States Constitution, Article 1 — Sections 4 and 5, Article 2 and the 12th Amendment, the United States Congress has absolute final say on election contests that involve any federal elected position. That’s the House, that’s the Senate and that’s the White House. I’m hopeful that we will exercise that authority and protect the sanctity of our voting system and stop the election theft that is undermining credibility of our republic.”

“The procedure is on January 6 at one o’clock, states will submit to the United States Congress with Vice President Mike Pence presiding, so it is a joint session, the states will submit to Congress their purported Electoral College vote results,” he continued. “And it is done in alphabetical order, and at any point in time, if one House member and one Senator file a joint objection, then the submissions by other states are stopped. We immediately take a two-hour recess from the joint Congress. The Senate goes back to their Senate chambers. The House stays on the House side. We have two hours of debate. At the conclusion of that two hours, we must have a House floor vote, and we must have a Senate floor vote on whether to accept or reject a state’s Electoral College vote submission.”

Brooks said there was “ambiguity” about how the vote would be decided. He explained it would be based on a majority in the Senate. However, in the House, it could be based on a vote by state congressional delegations according to the 12th Amendment. According to the Alabama lawmaker, 27 of the state delegations are controlled by Republicans and 20 by Democrats, with the others being evenly split. However, he said it could also come down to a simple majority of members of Congress, as well.

Brooks encouraged listeners to watch the video from Georgia, which shows what some are alleging is wrongdoing during a vote count.

BillW wrote: