monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

I forgot about Martha Stewart run in with Jail. Guess we have become immune to real scandals after four years of trump. She survived and has come back doing very well on the food and DYI shows, magazines...People still look to her as an expert in all those areas.

Nevertheless, the Georgia run-off has gotten me too nervous, I can't really watch it. It is encouraging that Stacey Abrams has been encouraging the get out to vote so democrats don't forget about it as we usually do during these run-offs and half term vote.

I forgot about Martha Stewart run in with Jail. Guess we have become immune to real scandals after four years of trump. She survived and has come back doing very well on the food and DYI shows, magazines...People still look to her as an expert in all those areas.

Nevertheless, the Georgia run-off has gotten me too nervous, I can't really watch it. It is encouraging that Stacey Abrams has been encouraging the get out to vote so democrats don't forget about it as we usually do during these run-offs and half term vote.

High Quality Statisical Analysis: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020. By Vote Integrity. This sort of work takes time, so it is good to see a careful, painstaking, and cautiously understated analysis arriving already.

While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny. …

This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates…

Nearly every vote update, across states of all sizes and political leanings follow [the same] statistical pattern. A very small number, however, are especially aberrant. Of the seven vote updates which follow the pattern the least, four individual vote updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — were particularly anomalous and influential with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.

Quote:

The four vote updates in question are:

An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

[/b]
This report predicts what these vote updates would have looked like, had they followed the same pattern as the vast majority of the 8,950 others. We find that the extents of the respective anomalies here are more than the margin of victory in all three states — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia — which collectively represent forty-two electoral votes. …

In other words, these four vote updates alone won the vote count as it currently stands for Biden.

We merely show that the data, adjusted appropriately to remove differences in size and political leaning between states, does follow a certain pattern, and that four key vote updates deviate profoundly from that pattern. …

It is our belief that the extraordinarily anomalous nature of the studied vote updates here, combined with the staggering political implications, demands immediate and thorough investigation. …

Extensive mathematical detail is provided and the data and the code (for the data-curation, data transformation, plotting, and modeling) are all attached in the appendix to this document.

This is powerful evidence of fraud. It’s all at the link.

breaking --

Biden wins Arizona... again...

Biden wins Arizona... again...

Quote:

Biden wins Arizona... again...

You see, that just proves the election was powerfully fraudulent. If Biden won even just once, that makes no sense at all. But if he wins time after time after time, that just underlines how corrupt the entire system is.

Will Trump send the Paris Agreement to the US Senate?

To prevent the Paris Climate Accord from taking on such undue power, Mr. Trump should submit it to the Senate, and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell should schedule a quick vote. It would certainly be rejected—ratification requires a two-thirds vote—and it is unlikely any court could subsequently resurrect a legislatively tossed treaty. Without the help of judges, Mr. Biden would need a winning ratification vote to make the accord binding, which he likely couldn’t get no matter how well Democrats do in Georgia’s January runoffs and the 2022 midterm elections.

Making light of it will only bolster attempts to get the information out and prove it to all of the American people.

Quote:

Making light of it will only bolster attempts to get the information out and prove it to all of the American people.

And pretending that you don't care what the rest of the planet thinks of the abomination you're calling "democratic process" is puerile, at best, and borderline NPD at worst. Snood and puppets, take note.

You think the rest of the world is upset that Trump is leaving?

Doing your usual strawman "trick" again?

The "world" wants to know why a senile paedophile octogenarian is the best you could do against Trump.

The Republican appointed by Trump to police cyber security and the Republican Secretaries of state in contested states all say that the election was secure and free of any widespread fraud.

Stop the stupid.

maybe 45 can figure out a way to purchase kanye's 60,000 votes...