@coldjoint,
That one was actually interesting - the anomaly is
very odd, and highly likely to indicate computer issues or fraud (yes, even the
original report doesn't outright say just fraud).
The shame about this report is:
- it doesn't show the other top ten anomalies (which are needed for comparison to gain a better understanding); and
- as in the computer irregularities claim, the lack of linkage to the actual data is problematic - and it should have been very easy for the report to link to the official data (that they obviously accessed), so why didn't they?