monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Dominion Voting Systems ‘Lawyers Up,’ Abruptly Backs Out of PA State House Fact-Finding Hearing

Dominion Voting Systems Thursday night abruptly backed out of attending a fact-finding hearing that was set for Friday morning with the Pennsylvania House State Government Committee.

At a press conference Friday morning, State Govt Committee Chair Seth Grove said the 1.3. million Pennsylvanians who used Dominion’s voting machines have been “hung out to dry and slapped in their faces.”

Pennsylvania lawmakers had scheduled the hearing with the voting machine manufacturer “to help identify and correct any irregularities in the election process,” according to the House Republican Caucus.

“It is vitally important voters have faith in the machines they use to cast their ballots. On the heels of Gov. Tom Wolf unilaterally decertifying every voting machine in the Commonwealth, we need to know whether these new machines met expectations, whether they are reliable and whether they are not subject to interference,” said Rep. Grove (R-York).

Dominion had initially agreed to attend the hearing, before it “abruptly canceled,” Grove said.

“I was impressed at what appeared to be the willingness that Dominion Voting Systems to address accusations and it would have put 1.3. million Pennsylvanians who used their machines at ease—including myself, thinking that Dominion was willing to publicly back up their product which PA taxpayers invested millions to purchase” he noted during the presser. “Unfortunately, last evening, Dominion Voting Systems lawyered up, and backed out of their commitment to the people of Pennsylvania to provide their input in a public format.”

Grove blasted the company for “retreating into the darkness,” rather than appearing at the hearing with “honesty and integrity.”

The committee chair said he wanted to know why a company with nothing to hide would back out.

Detroit asks judge to sanction Trump campaign for spreading 'disinformation'

In his 2019 book Siege, [Michael] Wolff wrote, "Trump was vulnerable because for 40 years he had run what increasingly seemed to resemble a semi-criminal enterprise," then quoted Bannon as saying, "I think we can drop the 'semi' part." Wolff wrote that Bannon predicted investigations into Trump's finances would be his political downfall, quoting Bannon as saying "This is where it isn't a witch hunt – even for the hard core, this is where he turns into just a crooked business guy, and one worth $50 million instead of $10 billion. Not the billionaire he said he was, just another scumbag."[224]

This is a quote I do not recall reading...

Quote:

In his 2019 book Siege, [Michael] Wolff wrote, "Trump was vulnerable because for 40 years he had run what increasingly seemed to resemble a semi-criminal enterprise," then quoted Bannon as saying, "I think we can drop the 'semi' part." Wolff wrote that Bannon predicted investigations into Trump's finances would be his political downfall, quoting Bannon as saying "This is where it isn't a witch hunt – even for the hard core, this is where he turns into just a crooked business guy, and one worth $50 million instead of $10 billion. Not the billionaire he said he was, just another scumbag."[224]

from the wikipedia page on Bannon

Sure would help explain Trump's behavior

Quote:

Detroit asks judge to sanction Trump campaign for spreading 'disinformation'

The Communists are at it again and the media has its nose up their asses.

The people determine what disinformation is, not a judge or these lying hypocrites.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2802M8

6 billion popular votes.

Quote:

6 billion popular votes.

You senile like Biden, or are you counting the votes for Biden world wide. I would not be surprised that Democrats took mail in votes from China and their other allies like Iran.

All you do is repeat you won. you have yet to acknowledge or debunk the incidents of fraud that are verified and true. You have nothing but a huge lie. People know it is a lie and will prove it.

And I said judges do not have the right to tell us what disinformation is.

People know it is a lie and will prove it.

Quote:

People know it is a lie and will prove it.

Then the Trump campaign should actually provide the proof to the court before the Governor of Georgia officially certifies the state results on Saturday, 23 hours from now.

If they really had the proof, are they waiting until the very last possible moment for dramatic effect?

Quote:

People know it is a lie and will prove it.

Then the Trump campaign should actually provide the proof to the court before the Governor of Georgia officially certifies the state results on Saturday, 23 hours from now.

If they really had the proof, are they waiting until the very last possible moment for dramatic effect?

Rebelofnj wrote:

Quote:

People know it is a lie and will prove it.

Then the Trump campaign should actually provide the proof to the court before the Governor of Georgia officially certifies the state results on Saturday, 23 hours from now.

If they really had the proof, are they waiting until the very last possible moment for dramatic effect?

Those figures (if true, which I doubt) are not evidence, they are statistics which show anomalies. Anomalies highlight places to look for evidence which INVESTIGATORS MUST research to see if it is an innocent occurrence or illegal manipulations; therefore, evidence of fraud. The innocent don't prove themselves innocent, the accusers must prove a crime occurred and by whom!

but remember this is going to the Supreme Court.

But you and all your hot-pink written nonsense can’t do jack squat about it.

coldjoint wrote:

but remember this is going to the Supreme Court.

No it's not.

Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Responds to Tucker Carlson: ‘He Was Insulting, Demanding and Rude’

Friday on Fox Business Network’s “Morning with Maria,” Trump lawyer Sidney Powell responded to Tucker Carlson, who a night earlier had said his show had asked for evidence from Powell to back up allegations electronic voting machines had changed millions of votes that went for President Donald Trump.

Powell called Carlson’s requests “insulting, demanding and rude.”

“I didn’t get angry with the request to provide evidence,” she said. “In fact, I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation, and I offered him another witness who could explain the math and the statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person.”

“He was insulting, demanding and rude,” Powell added. “And I told him not to contact me again, in those terms.”

Trump using showmanship when his job is on the line and in the courts where theatrics don't matter is not a great strategy.

He is just wasting everyone's time and his supporters' money. There is no way the Supreme Court will play any role in this election.