192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:11 pm
@coldjoint,
Population control isn't a State mandate.
snood
 
  3  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:13 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

neptuneblue wrote:

coldjoint wrote:
but remember this is going to the Supreme Court.


No it's not.

Oh yes it is.


Oh no, it’s not.
snood
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:15 pm
@lmur,
lmur wrote:

Unconfirmed reports that Don Jr. may have contracted coronavirus.


Yup.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/don-trump-jr-tests-positive-for-covid-19
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:18 pm
@snood,
Not gonna get there. Enough states will certify if to prove to everybody relevant trump lost. Even if it gets tp the point where they have to sic the bloodhounds on him, he will be turned out of the white house.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:19 pm
@snood,

he must have been seated at the kiddie table with Rudy Jr ...
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:20 pm
@Region Philbis,
Region Philbis wrote:


he must have been seated at the kiddie table with Rudy Jr ...

And he will also survive like 99.7% do.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:22 pm
@coldjoint,
truly fatheaded argument. Biden has displayed mastery of the political game and clearly has his smarts about him. His transition planning makes far more sense than trump's total abdication of responsibility since the election.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:31 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Biden has displayed mastery of the political game and clearly has his smarts about him

Laughing Laughing Laughing Maybe he has your smarts, you are fresh out.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:32 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

coldjoint wrote:

neptuneblue wrote:

coldjoint wrote:
but remember this is going to the Supreme Court.


No it's not.

Oh yes it is.


Oh no, it’s not.

Why isn't it?
oristarA
 
  1  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:37 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:


Remember the media and Democrats are batting 0 against Trump so, again, what makes you think you will win this time?



Trump and his allies have lost election-related cases in three key states: Arizona, Pennsylvania and Georgia. What else can Trump and his team do? He is simply wasting eveyrbody's time.


coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:42 pm
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

coldjoint wrote:


Remember the media and Democrats are batting 0 against Trump so, again, what makes you think you will win this time?



Trump and his allies have lost cases in three key states: Arizona, Pennsylvania and Georgia. What else can Trump and his team do? He is just wasting eveyrbody's time.



There are over a thousand affidavits and very clear statistical evidence. He is wasting no ones time. Is it hard to be so uninformed or that intolerant of the reality there was fraud? Do you honestly think Biden is the most popular candidate in our history?

Trump is not going to concede and that braindead crook Biden will never be a legitimate president. Trump will use every minute he has and there is little anyone can do about that.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  3  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:45 pm
@coldjoint,
For the same reason it’s been thrown out of other courts 30 times. The Supreme Court doesn’t just hear any case that people try to bring before them. They get about 10,000 petitions a year. Most of those cases are appeals from lower courts. They will know that the case has already been presented and rejected many times. They will look at the facts and decide if it has merit enough to hear.
If Four of the justices think it has merit, they hear it.

Four Justices will have to see some merit that’s been invisible all the times the related cases have been thrown out.

I guess you think they’ll see it.

I don’t.


Again, I guess we’ll see.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 06:56 pm
@snood,
Quote:
If Four of the justices think it has merit, they hear it.

Keep in mind those justices are citizens and can see the one sided bullshit every American with any sense of decency sees. They will take the case if nothing else but to finally give Americans the truth.
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 07:01 pm
@coldjoint,
No they won't.

The head of Cyber Security has said this has been the safest election ever. Once each State certifies their election, there will not be any reason for the Supreme Court to even hear the case.

The End.
snood
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 07:02 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
If Four of the justices think it has merit, they hear it.

Keep in mind those justices are citizens and can see the one sided bullshit every American with any sense of decency sees. They will take the case if nothing else but to finally give Americans the truth.


We can guess, but we’ll have to wait and see.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 07:08 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
If Four of the justices think it has merit, they hear it.

Keep in mind those justices are citizens and can see the one sided bullshit every American with any sense of decency sees. They will take the case if nothing else but to finally give Americans the truth.


We can guess, but we’ll have to wait and see.

Until then the ridiculous things you expect people believe will be front and center in my posts.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 07:10 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

Population control isn't a State mandate.

And killing a baby that survives an abortion is not murder, right?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 07:13 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

No they won't.

The head of Cyber Security has said this has been the safest election ever. Once each State certifies their election, there will not be any reason for the Supreme Court to even hear the case.

The End.


I guess we have to acknowledge the existence of a possibility, no matter how slim a possibility, that four of the Justices could make a choice not based on evidence or facts or common sense, but on personal feelings.

I mean, we think it’s a slam dunk that they won’t. But they are the SCOTUS. They don’t answer to anyone else, and they can do whatever they want.

So no one will know if the SC will hear Trump’s petition about widespread fraud until they actually consider it, then say yea or nay.

0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 07:13 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

No they won't.

Once each State certifies their election, there will not be any reason for the Supreme Court to even hear the case.

The End.

Quote:
The head of Cyber Security has said this has been the safest election ever.

Tell me, what has cyber security has to do with mail in ballots and the people who count them? Lip service from a corrupt bureaucrat. Just another lie.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Fri 20 Nov, 2020 07:25 pm
https://time.com/5914377/donald-trump-no-evidence-fraud/

Quote:
..................
In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

In a separate state case in Montgomery County, Pa., a judge asked Trump lawyer Jonathan S. Goldstein whether he was alleging fraud. “Your honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein said. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the [Democratic National Committee] or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith.” The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”

In yet another state case in Bucks County, Pa., Trump’s attorneys signed a joint stipulation of facts that explicitly admits that they are not alleging fraud, despite the President and his lawyers’ repeated public claims, according to Marc Elias, a lawyer working for Democrats on election-related cases. The stipulation of facts reads in part: “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots.” The stipulation also says they don’t allege or have evidence of “misconduct” or “impropriety” in connection with the challenged ballots.

On Thursday, a judge rejected the Trump campaign’s attempt to throw out absentee ballots in the Bucks County case, noting, “The parties specifically stipulated in their comprehensive stipulation of facts that there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots. There is nothing in the record and nothing alleged that would lead to the conclusion that any of the challenged ballots were submitted by someone not qualified or entitled to vote in this election.”

In a state case concerning votes in Maricopa County, Ariz., Trump lawyers again dodged and weaved. On Nov. 12, the same day that the President himself was tweeting about hundreds of thousands of votes being stolen from him, a Trump campaign attorney Kory Langhofer told a judge, “We are not alleging fraud in this lawsuit. We are not alleging anyone stealing the election.”

Two Republican senators both released statements Thursday based on Trump’s failures in court. “Based on what I’ve read in their filings, when Trump campaign lawyers have stood before courts under oath, they have repeatedly refused to actually allege grand fraud — because there are legal consequences for lying to judges,” Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse said in part.
...................


theRump's crack (sic) team states to the Judges explicitly over and over again that there is no evidence of fraud! In fact, they are not even presenting a case of fraud. But liars on the right in these threads keep saying the opposite - go figure? They know better? I and you know the truth!

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 04:26:58