monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Quote:

LAURA INGRAHAM (HOST): The left here and abroad is using the tragedy of this pandemic to turn over political decision-making to unelected health experts who have zero accountability to you. And regardless of how wrong they have been in model after model, they want us to have no choice in the matter whenever they decide to put the brakes on freedom. So if your kids ask you why Tuesday matters, well, tell them. Because our freedom matters. Because without freedom, what are we anyway? Millions of serfs waiting to receive new rules from nameless faceless bureaucrats?

MM

But just yesterday at a Trump rally, Ingraham was attending and Trump pointed her out then teased her for being politically correct for wearing a mask. Which of course is not to say that Fox is best understood as a money-making scam.

And if you hadn't noticed, recent Trump rallies are being stage managed a bit differently now with fans behind Trump (therefore in camera) wearing masks far more than two weeks ago. This is partly a growing recognition masks are important but I think it is also a PR decision by Trump's team (far fewer masks in the audience not visible).

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

No attempts to make even a poor defense. Not even any shouting at me for bringing it up. Just silence or absence like that "long dark cloud coming down" that Dylan speaks of. It would be very interesting to see an MRI of those brains right at that point where the cognitive dissonance is strong enough to make something like a black hole.

1 Reply

@blatham,

blatham wrote:

No attempts to make even a poor defense. Not even any shouting at me for bringing it up. Just silence or absence like that "long dark cloud coming down" that Dylan speaks of. It would be very interesting to see an MRI of those brains right at that point where the cognitive dissonance is strong enough to make something like a black hole.

Do you think the section in the brain that says keeping your word adds to your character is in operating order? Yours is not. That could be why no one answered. They did not think it was worth their time.

0 Replies

Biden and Harris Lock Up the Nihilist Vote

If you want more lockdowns, race riots, and who knows what else, vote Democrat.

https://cms.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2020/10/the-cackler-and-the-joeker-.jpg?itok=J3I9kBYu

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/10/biden-and-harris-lock-nihilist-vote-bosch-fawstin/

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

see what i mean, re your posts? GIGO.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

see what i mean, re your posts? GIGO.

No, I don't see what you mean because you say nothing with any meaning behind it. You silly catch phrases and repeat rhetoric mean nothing but you cannot make an intelligent argument.

So let's have another zinger. Laughing

0 Replies

The **** sandwich the Democrats have been offering the citizens has lost it appeal. People are not going to take one more bite because the Democrats have taken the bread away. The apathetic white voters are fed up and like it or not there are a lot of them. They will not see this country destroyed.

Quote:

Early voting trends continue to move in Trump’s favor. – In addition to the great early voting news coming out of the key states of Florida, North Carolina and others, Larry Schweikart cited a new, potentially consequential trend taking hold in Virginia, Arizona and Colorado yesterday:

From "Freeper" bort: Per TargetSmart:
White early vote currently at 81% of electorate in AZ.
Whites w/o a college degree 52%.
College-educatied whites at 28%

2016 CNN exit polls of AZ:
White 75% electorate
Whites w/o college degree 35%
College 40%

Notice a difference?

— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) October 30, 2020

https://t.co/QhOsY7xpys

"Freeper" bort points out that indeed CO and VA may be in play because
*MUCH higher % of white males voting
*MUCH higher % of non-college voting.

— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) October 29, 2020

**UPDATE** Oh, my, oh, my, oh, my, my, my – this trend is also happening in a very big way in…wait for it…NEW MEXICO:

From "Freeper" bort
2020 NM early vote data from TargetSmart:

Non-college whites: 41.5% of all early voters
College-educated whites: 24.9%

2016
Non-college whites: 21%
College-educated whites: 29%

As across the board, this election non-college whites are making up larger %

— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) October 30, 2020

Holy smokes.

This all supports my theory that America is about to experience what its first “outrage election” looks like. One of the main demographic groups that has failed in the past to turn out in big numbers is the white, non-college educated, lower-to-middle-class voter. Especially the men in that group.

This was the demographic that did show up in big numbers for Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania in 2016, and they essentially were the difference in the entire election. Now, we appear to be seeing this same demographic of voters, disenchanted by the media/Democrat propaganda merchants calling them all racists for years now, sick of being lectured by multi-millionaire athletes like Lebron James about the ‘white privilege’ they have never personally experienced in their own lives, and outraged by all the riots and street violence they have witnessed on their televisions over the past 5 months, apparently now quietly coming out to vote en masse to express their displeasure with our culture’s prevailing status quo.

https://dbdailyupdate.com/2020/10/30/friday-news-roundup-why-donald-trump-will-be-a-two-term-president/

1 Reply

@FreedomEyeLove,

Quote:

Can you answer a simple yes or no question?

Clearly the answer is "no", because you refuse to be honest or acknowledge facts.

Good to know.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Um...why not just wait a week or two and see how it all pans out? Larry might be a great guy (or not) but he's not exactly a disinterested neutral observer. All this obsessing about "what's going to happen" is stupid. Wait a few days and we'll have the official (initial) results. Following that there will still be a lot of absentee ballots to count but at least we'll have some real numbers to discuss instead of this childish "according to my new theory our side is already winning" — no one knows yet. This sort of cheer leading is just a method media outlets use to increase market size — get more clicks, sell more papers, attract more advertisers.

1 Reply

@FreedomEyeLove,

Quote:

Clearly the answer is "no", because you refuse to be honest or acknowledge facts.

Who is "you"? You replied to yourself so it's not exactly clear.

1 Reply

@hightor,

Quote:

Um...why not just wait a week or two and see how it all pans out?

Good question, why don't you?

1 Reply

@hightor,

hightor wrote:

Quote:
Clearly the answer is "no", because you refuse to be honest or acknowledge facts.

Who is "you"? You replied to yourself so it's not exactly clear.

FEL is talking about himself. He/She is acknowledging that FEL is not honest and can't acknowledge the facts!

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Please source that 1.4 % number.
CDC COVID-19 Survival Rates

Don't you think that it's odd the page lists "Survival Rates" at the top when it talks about Infection Fatality Rate? If IFR is 1.4%, then SR is 98.6%. 98.6%. - how wonderful it looks!

coldjoint wrote:

Sure seems millions are going to take a while

Have you seen CDC refers to the data about infection fatality rate there? It lists mathematical model scenarios there and clearly points out “The parameters in the scenarios… Are not predictions of the expected effects of COVID-19.” Do you have a clue about the hypothetical “planning scenarios”?

Use your common sense before I reveal the source of 1.4% of IFR.

Wikipedia COVID-19 pandemic data

World total cases: 45,916,151
World total deaths: 1,193,070
The world infection fatality rate: 2.6%

United States total cases: 9,222,849
US total deaths: 234,085
The US infection fatality rate: 2.5%

With 2.5% IFR, the natural herd immunity reached in the US will claim 5.8 milions of American lives.
(331,558,077 * 2.5% * 70% = 5.8 millions)

"Wait!" you may cry out because there are many people who have had the COVID-19 without being diagnosed. But reality is: Not that many! "Serology tests suggest that about 5% of U.S. citizens (15-20 million) have been exposed to Covid-19".

That is why 1.4% rather than 2.5% was used in the calculation because of having considered the undiagnosed Americans.

1 Reply

@oristarA,

Quote:

Use your common sense before I reveal the source of 1.4% of IFR.

So more secrets? You realize the public has never a had a honest answer since the start of this crap. I do not want to play games. The disease is not a deadly one. It has been politicized and is being used for political change all over the world.

So, bottom line, what makes you think the information you have is correct or valid? Before you put a fancy trusted institutions name on it or God forbid a UN funded something remember almost everyone has been caught in a lie.

1 Reply

@Builder,

Builder wrote:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

USA and India are at the top of the chart. Despite social distancing being impossible in many areas of India, their deaths per million is at 88, currently, while the US of A, with supposedly the best medical facilities available, is showing 709 deaths per million.

Anyone with more than a few firing synapses would understand that the death rate in America, is being either manipulated, or, as sources will show, many other deaths are being attributed to covid, when it was just a symptom, and not the cause.

So whether you have had "a few firing synapses" is questionable because you failed to consider the possibility of India's manipluating their data. The US's Johns Hopkins University is well respected by the world and its data is considered trustworthy. Tell me, who repects India's with its questionable medical facilities?

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Haven't I told "Use your common sense"? Put aside any institutions and calculate the numbers yourself.

1 Reply

@oristarA,

oristarA wrote:

Haven't I told "Use your common sense"? Put aside any institutions and calculate the numbers yourself.

I told you I do not trust the numbers. Do you have a comprehension problem?

1 Reply

@oristarA,

Quote:

you failed to consider the possibility of India's manipluating their data

And you've failed to state why India would be manipulating data. Their hospitals don't get money per death, like the US hospitals have been doing.

Quote:

The US's Johns Hopkins University is well respected by the world and its data is considered trustworthy.

And yet, surprisingly, the USA doesn't even make the top 10 in the healthcare stakes. Ironic that Spain tops the list, when their death "toll" from covid is astronomical.

Might be a bit of culling going, yes?

I guess that's how it pans out, when pharmaceutical companies buy their way into lobbying positions.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

Peer-reviewed journals like Science, New England Journal of Medicine normally stick to academic integrity and follow rigorous science. Their data are certainly worth serious consideration. I am sorry that you have been suffering from the illusional symptoms of being deeply manipulated.

2 Replies

@oristarA,

oristarA wrote:

Peer-reviewed journals like Science, New England Journal of Medicine normally stick to academic integrity and follow rigorous science. Their data are certainly worth serious consideration. I am sorry that you have been suffering from the illusional symptoms of being deeply manipulated.

Academic integrity is like journalism. They are both dead.

You are projecting when you call anyone manipulated. And I was impressed, but your answer was condescending and you have just melted into a crowd that does not tolerate different ideas about the reality we face.

0 Replies

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know