@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:I said it was NON-CONSTITUTIONAL.
If "non-constitutional" merely means that it's not in the Constitution, then every written thing besides the Constitution itself is non-constitutional, including every statute on the books.
farmerman wrote:Only 3 states tally and award electors as it was intended by the authors. "Winner take all" was another trick to enhance the hold by small pop states in the 1820's.
It's not a trick, and it doesn't enhance anything. It's just one way of doing things.
farmerman wrote:Today we have the opposite happening. Large states are being totally disenfranchised and the goal of one voter, one vote is being trampled.
There is no such disenfranchisement. The Democrats are the only party with a history of disenfranchising people.
farmerman wrote:This needs to be changed.
I perceive no such need.
farmerman wrote:I hope you can understand the issue if you can get the 2nd A out of your frontal ganglia for a few hours.
I can understand it easily.
farmerman wrote:So the felon liar-in-chief
No such felony.
Just because the progressives say that the truth is a lie, that doesn't make reality untrue.
farmerman wrote:is stamping all over our civil rights by trying to terminate the census in order to disenfranchise even more people in Calif,NY, and several others.
Preventing progressives from cheating is not disenfranchisement.
The Democrats are the only party with a history of disenfranchising people.