@layman,
Quote:Policies are not, as the idealists would have it, based on some universal norms, independent of interests of the parties involved.
A recent illustration of his simple point is the rioters at Berkeley who beat those who did not share their political ideology; who wantonly destroyed the property of "capitalist" banks and of the University that was prepared to allow freedom of speech. They succeeded in suppressing free speech and peaceful assembly, all in the name of "opposition to tyranny."
Heh, what a joke. And, since then, about 5 student editorials in the Berkeley students newspaper have argued that this criminal, anti-democratic, abuse was fully justified to "protect" students from harm (the "harm" of tolerating opposing viewpoints).
I don't recall a single MSN opinion piece condemning this fascist mentality. Instead they wanted to slander the speaker as being a racist white supremacist, with the implicit suggestion that his supporters deserved to be beaten, and that he had no right to speak.