192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 07:21 pm
@layman,
Quote:
Don’t use Republican language, or repeat their positions, even to negate them.


Yeah, that's the ticket! Don't ever repeat their positions. Just make some **** up, and go from there.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 07:52 pm
Trump has a sense of history, and a knack for one-upmanship.

Tuesday is Valentines Day, which has a certain historical significance in Chicago.

Bugsy Moran said: "Capone did it. Only Capone kills like that."

Well, Bugsy never saw Trump in action, ya know.

The upcoming massacre will henceforth completely over-shadow and supplant the meaning of "St. Valentine's Day Massacre" in Chicago.

And, unlike Capone, Trump won't let his main target get away.

Ya can run, but ya can't hide, Rahm Emanuel.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 08:49 pm
@camlok,
Quote:
Just as Lincoln's phony emancipation didn't change things, just as separate but equal didn't change things, just as Brown v Board of Education didn't change things, just as all the civil rights acts didn't change things, more band aids won't change things.


Can you truthfully say none of these initiatives changed anything?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 09:00 pm
@camlok,
Quote:
At what US torture site around the world would you suggest the gallows should operate for US war criminals?

If there's one here in British Columbia, I'd help out.
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 09:04 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
At what US torture site around the world would you suggest the gallows should operate for US war criminals?

If there's one here in British Columbia, I'd help out.


Yeah, you'll be helping out, sho nuff, by slippin your sorry head into a noose.

Last words: "Can I please take one more nibble on this chunk of limberger?"

You commies would have to win, first, if you wanna be the ones doin the hangin.

Aint gunna happen, loser.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 09:21 pm
Quote:
Political Realism in International Relations

In the discipline of international relations there are contending general theories or theoretical perspectives. Realism, also known as political realism, is a view of international politics that stresses its competitive and conflictual side. It is usually contrasted with idealism or liberalism, which tends to emphasize cooperation.

While classical realism emphasizes the concept of national interest, it is not the Machiavellian doctrine “that anything is justified by reason of state” (Bull 1995, 189). Nor does it involve the glorification of war or conflict. The classical realists do not reject the possibility of moral judgment in international politics. Rather, they are critical of moralism—abstract moral discourse that does not take into account political realities. They assign supreme value to successful political action based on prudence: the ability to judge the rightness of a given action from among possible alternatives on the basis of its likely political consequences.

Human nature is a starting point for classical political realism. Realists view human beings as inherently egoistic and self-interested to the extent that self-interest overcomes moral principles. At the debate in Sparta, described in Book I of Thucydides' History, the Athenians affirm the priority of self-interest over morality. They say that considerations of right and wrong have “never turned people aside from the opportunities of aggrandizement offered by superior strength”


https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/

Quote:
“Life is nothing but a competition to be the criminal rather than the victim.” (Bertrand Russell)
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 09:36 pm
Quote:
In his main work on international relations, The Twenty Years' Crisis, first published in July 1939, Edward Hallett Carr (1892–1982) attacks the idealist position, which he describes as “utopianism.”

He characterizes this position as encompassing faith in reason, confidence in progress, a sense of moral rectitude, and a belief in an underlying harmony of interests.

According to the idealists, war is an aberration in the course of normal life and the way to prevent it is to educate people for peace, and to build systems of collective security such as the League of Nations or today's United Nations.

His central idea is that the interests of a given party always determine what this party regards as moral principles, and hence, these principles are not universal. Carr observes that politicians, for example, often use the language of justice to cloak the particular interests of their own countries, or to create negative images of other people to justify acts of aggression.

Policies are not, as the idealists would have it, based on some universal norms, independent of interests of the parties involved.

Values that idealists view as good for all, such as peace, social justice, prosperity, and international order, are regarded by Carr as mere status quo notions. The powers that are satisfied with the status quo regard the arrangement in place as just and therefore preach peace. They try to rally everyone around their idea of what is good.

Idealists fail if in their attempt they do not pay enough attention to the reality of power...their belief that Germany could be satisfied by territorial concessions, helped to foster a political environment in which the latter was to grow in power, annex Czechoslovakia at will, and be militarily opposed in September 1939 by Poland alone.
blatham
 
  6  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 09:36 pm
America is changing. Tonight at the Grammys, there was an award for Best Neo-Nazi Choral Album.
layman
 
  -2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 09:56 pm
@layman,
Quote:
Policies are not, as the idealists would have it, based on some universal norms, independent of interests of the parties involved.


A recent illustration of his simple point is the rioters at Berkeley who beat those who did not share their political ideology; who wantonly destroyed the property of "capitalist" banks and of the University that was prepared to allow freedom of speech. They succeeded in suppressing free speech and peaceful assembly, all in the name of "opposition to tyranny."

Heh, what a joke. And, since then, about 5 student editorials in the Berkeley students newspaper have argued that this criminal, anti-democratic, abuse was fully justified to "protect" students from harm (the "harm" of tolerating opposing viewpoints).

I don't recall a single MSN opinion piece condemning this fascist mentality. Instead they wanted to slander the speaker as being a racist white supremacist, with the implicit suggestion that his supporters deserved to be beaten, and that he had no right to speak.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:01 pm
@layman,
"Racist white supremacist" nails it.
blatham
 
  4  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:03 pm
@blatham,
I should have mentioned the winners in that category.

It was The Schicklgroovers
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:08 pm
layman
 
  -2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:10 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

"Racist white supremacist" nails it.


Heh, yeah, right, eh, Al?

Thanks for proving the point.

Just keep readin them left-wing rags and parroting their "talking points," eh? If you do, they will continue to praise you.

Chump.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:17 pm
@layman,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_the_United_States#Asian_Americans
blatham
 
  5  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:20 pm
Starving the trolls
Quote:
After years of criticism that it wasn’t taking harassment seriously, Twitter is planning to roll out some of its strongest tools yet to combat abusive content on the platform by virtually putting Twitter trolls in dark, soundproof room.

The company announced several improvements in a blog post Tuesday that it says will help make Twitter a safer place — including shutting down sock-puppet accounts created by users who have been previously suspended or banned, removing abusive tweets in search results, and collapsing “low quality” replies.
TP
layman
 
  -2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:26 pm
@cicerone imposter,


Well, now, aint that special, eh, Al?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_issues_in_China

Well, I suppose this is more up your alley, eh?

Quote:
JAPAN'S PROBLEM WITH RACE

The racial discrimination that exists in Japan is reminiscent of the segregation-based atmosphere of 1950s America, posing a hostile environment for those of non-Japanese origin.


http://www.newsweek.com/why-does-no-one-care-japanese-are-openly-racist-364129
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:45 pm
Brian Beutler ‏@brianbeutler 9m9 minutes ago

Trump was right, I am tired of all this winning.
dlowan
 
  1  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:52 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

America is changing. Tonight at the Grammys, there was an award for Best Neo-Nazi Choral Album.



[youtube]https://youtu.be/29Mg6Gfh9Co[/youtube]

An all time winner
dlowan
 
  2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:53 pm
@dlowan,
That worked well!
layman
 
  -2  
Sun 12 Feb, 2017 10:55 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Brian Beutler ‏@brianbeutler 9m9 minutes ago

Trump was right, I am tired of all this winning.


More pasted tweets, please!

Educational. So educational. More educational than any University, I can tell you that. Education is knowing what other people think, however insignificant they may be. School me, baby.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.79 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 09:41:22