192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 09:15 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
But you are trying to reason with someone who refuses reason.

You cannot point out any flaws in his reasoning.


Frank Apisa wrote:
All Trump supporters have been reduced to "refuse reason."

You cannot point out any flaws in my reasoning either.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 09:16 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
...or Trump WINS...and EVERYONE IN THE WORLD loses.

Only the bad guys lose when Mr. Trump wins.

When Mr. Trump wins, the good guys win too.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 09:49 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Olivier5 wrote:
What anybody wants is unverifiable by others.

That is incorrect. It is possible to assess that Black Lives Matter wants to prevent police officers from justifiably defending themselves by looking at the way they repeatedly lynch police officers for justified self defense.

No, you cannot verify what people want. What you can verify is what they SAY they want.

So, are you saying that the BLM board or equivalent SAID something you objected to? Is that the verifiable point you are trying to make?
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 09:57 am
Quote:
In order to punish the Germans for their supposedly low military expenditures, U.S. President Donald Trump wants to withdraw troops from the country. Observers see it a petty move by former Ambassador Richard Grenell that will primarily hurt American interests.


Trump’s Former Ambassador to Germany Gets His Revenge


https://i.imgur.com/AEGrVzt.jpg

The above list doesn't mention some smaller "bases", like the Edelweiss Lodge and Resort, the Edelweiss Vacation Village and Campground, and the use of former British Forces Germany sites.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:06 am
@Walter Hinteler,
So is Germany going to boost their defense spending now?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:07 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
No, you cannot verify what people want.

Sure you can. You can easily assess someone's goals by looking at their actions.


Olivier5 wrote:
What you can verify is what they SAY they want.

You can also verify what they actually do.


Olivier5 wrote:
So, are you saying that the BLM board or equivalent SAID something you objected to? Is that the verifiable point you are trying to make?

They are not merely talking. They are lynching police officers (and a neighborhood watch captain) for justifiably defending themselves.
goldberg
 
  0  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:11 am
@oralloy,
Are you Japanese? It would be lunacy for you to use the word invasion to describe this event. America's armed forces were not trying to invade Japan as you claimed. They were trying to save Asian people's lives and protecting lots of girls, including scads of Chinese girls who might have been raped by rapacious Japanese soldiers, just like what Japan did in Nanking in 1937, during which Japanese savages launched a killing game that croaked hundreds of thousands of people. Plus, floods of girls and women had been either raped or stabbed by Japanese soldiers during that period, including some little girls who were less than ten years old.

America did the right thing by using nuclear weapons; otherwise, Japan's pugnacious government wouldn't have learned a hard lesson.
goldberg
 
  0  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:22 am
@goldberg,
Iris Chang, the author of The Rape of Nanking, even decided to commit suicide after checking out lots of related pictures and interviewing the female victims. Then hard-right Japanese activists were calling her a revisionist , refuting her contention that Nanjing Massacre did happen in reality.

Tormented, Iris Chang chose to end her life . She may have decided to use this to tell people that she was put off by the ugliness of humanity.

Iris Chang's Chinese American. You are no match for her.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:35 am
@goldberg,
I'm a match for anyone. That's why no one is capable of providing examples of untrue statements in my posts.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:37 am
@goldberg,
goldberg wrote:
Are you Japanese?

No.


goldberg wrote:
It would be lunacy for you to use the word invasion to describe this event.

Not at all. That is the correct term.


goldberg wrote:
America's armed forces were not trying to invade Japan as you claimed.

Had Japan continued to refuse to surrender, there would have been a massive invasion of Japan.
goldberg
 
  0  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:37 am
@goldberg,
I remember watching a video clip featuring this. It has a tear-jerking moment in which an old man tells American journalists what happened to his mom. Her mom, who's been raped and stabbed, holds that old man's younger brother -then it was still a crying baby- tightly in her arms with her body drenched in blood. The little baby keeps crying since he is starving. Finding this, the mom starts feeding the baby with one of her breasts . She bleeds out soon. What's so striking is she still holds the baby closer to her bosom the moment she leaves this world.
0 Replies
 
goldberg
 
  0  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:41 am
@oralloy,
Japan launched the war, not America.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:45 am
@goldberg,
Well at least you got one thing right.

But we were still going to invade if they didn't surrender.
goldberg
 
  0  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:47 am
@oralloy,
Stop acting like a baka in the words of Japanese people. If hadn't been for America's nuclear bombs, the king of Japan wouldn't have said Uncle.
goldberg
 
  0  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:49 am
@oralloy,
Don't use the word invadeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. It would have been okay to change it to " visit Japan with guns blazing".
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:51 am
@goldberg,
Invade is a perfectly acceptable word to use.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 10:53 am
@goldberg,
Engaging in childish name-calling shows that you have no facts or logic to offer.

A lot of people like to argue that the A-bombs did or didn't cause surrender. That question is really unanswerable, but I'm sure someone who is equally foolish will be along to argue the unknowable with you.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 11:13 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Gee, luckily that doesn't resemble anyone we know on A2K!

If, which you are, referring to me and my use of "Killary"remember that is one of the nicer things I could call her.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 11:26 am
https://c2.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/05-Riot-Fire-LI-600.jpg
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  4  
Mon 15 Jun, 2020 11:44 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
[BLM] are lynching police officers (and a neighborhood watch captain) for justifiably defending themselves.

Okay, that's verifiable. Dead cops usually get noticed by the media, and if a BLM biard member was ever accused of killing a police officer, you should be able to prove that.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.34 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 11:43:55