@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
I'm not sure there is much room for interpretation there.
Well, maybe you're not sure, but some prominent legal scholars seem to be pretty sure. They're just words which have no have no inherent and necessary relationship to anything "out there" in objective reality. So you can define them however you want to, really:
Quote:Bills have been introduced from time to time in Congress which have sought to declare American-born children of foreign nationals not to be "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States", and thus not entitled to citizenship via the 14th Amendment, unless at least one parent was an American citizen or a lawful permanent resident.
A chinaman in a rice paddy is not "subject to our jurisdiction." If he were in our country he would be subject to our laws, but he'd still be a chinaman, subject to the juridiction of China. Same with foreign diplomats.