monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Wow! What a sore loser and the Hell with tradition. He is insulting Americans, again.


https://www.lifezette.com/2020/05/obama-reportedly-refuses-to-attend-wh-ceremony-to-unveil-his-official-portrait/

Bet this whistle blower does not stay anonymous. The media has to be chomping at the bitt to smear her.

In a nutshell.

Trump refused to unveil it, so what was the point of Obama showing up to stood up on camera.


Source: Business Insider

President Donald Trump won't be unveiling former President Barack Obama's portrait at the White House, breaking a 40-year tradition, NBC News reported on Tuesday.

Obama would also not be interested in attending such an event, according to the report, which cited people familiar with the matter.

The White House and a representative for Obama did not immediately
respond to requests for comment from Insider.

For decades, first-term presidents have held ceremonies in the East Room to unveil the portraits of their immediate predecessors. Obama did so for former President George W. Bush in 2012, for example.

Read more: https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-refusing-to-unveil-obama-portrait-at-the-white-house-2020-5

Where do you dig this **** up??? Didn't you even read you headline ????

LifeZette
lifezette.com
LifeZette is a conservative American website founded in 2015 by conservative political commentator Laura Ingraham and businessman Peter Anthony. In January 2018, Ingraham confirmed that she had sold the majority stake in LifeZette to The Katz Group, owned by Canadian billionaire Daryl Katz.Wikipedia

Laura Ingraham doesn't even pretend to be an open minded jiurnalist let alone any kind of reporter.



LifeZette

Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.
Share:
Lifezette - Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Libertarian - Not Credible - Some Fake NewsRIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Lifezette Right biased based on story selection that always favors the right and denigrates the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion of conspiracy theories and a poor fact check record. Lifezette is one failed fact check away from moving to the Questionable source list.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180

History

LifeZette is a conservative American news, opinion, and commentary website based in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 2015 by conservative pundit and radio host Laura Ingraham. According to their about page “LifeZette is a for-profit and editorially independent publication.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website was purchased by the Katz Group in 2018 and funded through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Lifezette reports news with right wing bias in story selection that always favors the right. On the website news is broken into the following right leaning categories: Drain the Swamp, Border Security, Traditional Values, Constitutional Freedoms and Liberal Hypocrisy. Lifezette frequently utilizes loaded emotional headlines such as this: Fake Charities Seek to Exploit One of America’s Most Vulnerable Populations (Terrible!). In general, news stories are properly sourced to credible media outlets though they have failed fact checks (see below).

Lifezette has also been accused of peddling conspiracy theories such as Billionaire George Soros being linked to voting machines and the Clinton’s body count. Further, the founder of Lifezette, Laura Ingraham, has very poor track record with fact checkers.

A factual search reveals multiple failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

UN Backs Secret Obama Takeover of Police – FALSE
Did Emmanuel Macron Give U.S. Liberals ‘Refugee Status’ in France? – FALSE
Tim Kaine: ‘Whites Must Become a Minority’ – FALSE
Headlines Spin Ukrainian Donations to Clinton Charity – FALSE

Overall, we rate Lifezette Right biased based on story selection that always favors the right and denigrates the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion of conspiracy theories and a poor fact check record. Lifezette is one failed fact check away from moving to the Questionable source list. (10/5/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 10/26/2019)

Source: https://www.lifezette.com

Trump's word against Obama's. Trump wins. Anything on the whistle blower?

If that's true, why doesn't Trump put the lie to it and invite Obama. That would sure teach us a lesson now wouldn't it?????

Cannot teach people who refuse to learn. You are one of those people.

Lucianne.com



Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lucianne-com/


Share:
Lucianne.com - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - ConspiracyQUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate Lucianne.com right biased due to story selection that almost always favor the right and Questionable based the use of poor sources that frequently fail fact checks.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Poor Sources that frequently fail fact checks.
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180

History

Founded in 2003 by author Lucianne Goldberg, Lucianne.com is a conservative blog that features news articles posted by members in a forum format. According to their Rules & FAQ page they state “Please, post only news articles, columns and commentary from legitimate, on-line newspapers, magazines and/or news websites. We prefer articles no older than 48 hours – – – unless an older article would serve as vital background for a current posted article.”

Lucianne Goldberg is best known for encouraging Linda Tripp to illegally record Monica Lewinsky discussing her sexual relationship with Bill Clinton. Goldberg was later subpoenaed to testify before a Maryland grand jury that was contemplating indicting Tripp for having made the recordings. Charges against Tripp were eventually dropped.

Funded by / Ownership

The website is held by Lucianne.com Media, LLC, which is owned by Lucianne Goldberg. The website generates revenue through advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the website features snippets and summaries of news articles that link to the full article. Below the article is a comment section (forum) where members can discuss and reply to one another regarding the content of the article. The news articles published by members range from Right-Center to Extreme Right conservative. Many of the sources come from factually Mixed sources such as Bizpac Review, Powerline, and questionable sources such as American Thinker, Gateway Pundit and Breitbart. We also found articles published from non-credible sources such as Rush Limbaugh and right wing conspiracy and pseudoscience website, Natural News. Lastly, credible sources are used as well, such as Reuters, The Hill and New York Times.

We did not perform a factual search because Lucianne.com does not publish original content. However, the sources utilized that we listed above have failed dozens of fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

Overall, we rate Lucianne.com right biased due to story selection that almost always favor the right and Questionable based the use of poor sources that frequently fail fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 7/31/2019)

Source: https://www.lucianne.com/

You wouldn't know truth and fact if it bit du an diene tuches.

dein/e

Danke. I'm dyslexic in several languages.

Does this mean there is not a whistle blower? No it does not. Can you prove this story is false. That double ended arrow does not mean ****.

Doesn't prove there isn't a "whistleblower". Doesn't prove there is. Luceanne doesn't "publish" original material, she publishes from other blogs.

How would Luceanne know? How would we know? Who was the source of this "info"? You don't know. I don't know. Luceanned doesn't know, she got this from another source. Who was that source? Who wrote the piece for that source? Right now its an unproven rumor.

The Ohio Star is the original source. Get your fact checker, they just might be real journalists.
I do not see them on the list.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/right/

Hells bells, cj, they do the same thing Luceanne does, mainly republish from blogs!!! Where did this information originate??????

The Ohio Star


Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.
Share:
Ohio Star - Right BiasRIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 2017, The Ohio Star is web only news source serving Ohio. This source does not have an about page and their domain registration is redacted for privacy. According to their contact page the CEO & Editor-in-Chief Michael Patrick Leahy.

Funded by / Ownership

The website does not disclose who the owner is, but they do list the CEO as Michael Patrick Leahy. The Ohio Star is funded through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Ohio Star reports news and publishes commentary with a right wing bias in story selection. There is moderate use of loaded language in headlines such as this: Commentary: Paul Ryan’s Legacy is the Destruction Of American Sovereignty. In this piece there isn’t any sourcing outside of a quote. In another story we also see a quote serving as a source, but nothing hyperlinked to actual data. The Ohio Star also republishes news from the factually Mixed, right biased Daily Caller, which allows republishing via Creative Commons. In general, all stories favor the the right. Many of the original pieces on this website are well written, but unfortunately lack proper sourcing.

A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check.

Overall, we rate The Ohio Star Right Biased based on story selection that favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing and a lack of an about page or mission statement. (D. Van Zandt 12/8/2018)

Source: http://theohiostar.com/

Follow the names

in this case, Michael Patrick Leahy

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/30/breitbart-tennessee-fake-news-560670

Hells Bells it does not prove there is not a whistle blower. The story can be checked by digging out the document. Maybe Grennel can find it.

https://www.salon.com/2019/03/05/republicans-launch-propaganda-sites-designed-to-look-like-local-news-outlets/



smarter than most of their readers by the looks of it - and they admit it

Your post also means nothing if the story is true. Facts have no bias. And, if true what kind of POS is Obama? You don't have to answer yet.

IF We still don't where it came from, who reported it, where he got the original story from. Its not true just because its been copywritten. He post is truty and chock full of facts. Where are your facts, what is the source!!!!