@farmerman,
You obviously know a lot about engineering but the law? Not so much.
The 9th Circuit's decision sets precedent only if the Supreme Court affirms it or refuses to hear an appeal.
The Supreme Court has reversed 86% of the 9th Circuit's decisions brought before it. That is a staggering demonstration of malfeasance on the part of those loony liberal judges. It is unethical for judges to allow provocation to influence their decisions, but that's Old Hat for the 9th Circus.
The SC will hear an appeal if for no other reason that there is a conflicting opinion from a MA judge.
Even the "liberal" justices on the SC can't be so politically motivated as allow States' Attorneys Generals to trump the president on matters of immigration and national security.
If they are, God help us as we will be headed towards a breakup of the union.
(And, preemptively, please stow you nonsense about such talk being treasonous)