192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  5  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 08:59 am
So, Benjamin Wittes, senior fellow at Brookings, posts a comment on the legal blog Lawfare re the appeals court ruling:
Quote:
“LAWFARE: ‘Remarkably, in the entire opinion, the panel did not bother even to cite this (the) statute.’ A disgraceful decision!”
(As noted at link, this tweet came minutes after Morning Joe mentioned it, an emerging pattern in Trump's "Law, History and Politics for Idiots" self-education strategy)

Then this:
Quote:
The author of the Lawfare post, Benjamin Wittes, a senior fellow in governance studies at Brookings and the co-founder of the blog, later Friday morning tweeted a link to the post with a note that he backs the court's ruling.

"You decide whether the POTUS is quoting me in context. Here's the article. For the record, I support the decision," he writes.
Politico
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 09:04 am
If I had to choose I like option 4.

Trump's travel ban: 4 options for what happens next

Quote:
4. Go write a new executive order
It may not be the president's inclination, but the appeals court panel hinted that a scaled-back executive order that did not bar all citizens from the seven countries might have a better shot at clearing legal hurdles. The court noted that the White House counsel's office already has proposed allowing travel by lawful permanent residents of the U.S.. It said such a change should come from the president. At the same time, the administration could eliminate references to protecting religious minorities, which appeared to single out majority Muslims for the ban.

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 09:09 am
I think we can pretty much count on this as a near certainty.
Quote:
Google has warned a number of prominent journalists that state-sponsored hackers are attempting to steal their passwords and break into their inboxes, the journalists tell POLITICO.

Jonathan Chait of New York Magazine said he received several messages from Google warning him about an attack from a government-backed hacker starting shortly after the election. He said the most recent warning came two to three weeks ago.

Julia Ioffe, who recently started at The Atlantic and has covered Russia for years, said she got warnings as recently as two weeks ago. (See one of the warnings: http://bit.ly/2kMUyRb)

Some journalists getting the warnings say they suspect the hackers could be Russians looking to find incriminating emails they could leak to embarrass journalists, either by revealing alleged liberal bias or to expose the sausage-making of D.C. journalism.

"The fact that all this started right after the election suggests to me that journalists are the next wave to be targeted by state-sponsored hackers in the way that Democrats were during it," said one journalist who got the warning. "I worry that the outcome is going to be the same: Someone, somewhere, is going to get hacked, and then the contents of their gmail will be weaponized against them — and by extension all media."
Politico
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 09:14 am
Wow. More than 2000 protesters at Chaffetz's townhall
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hundreds-chaffetz-town-hall
layman
 
  -3  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 09:19 am
Boy, the speed of this spamming onslaught is quite impressive, I must say! I go into the kitchen, pour a bowl of cornflakes, grab a couple beers to pour over them, come back and PRESTO!

5-6 new posts have suddenly appeared, now that Blathy is back in action.
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 09:23 am
Looks like the bargain of the century. And I expect that Trump Moats n Barriers, Inc. will do excellent construction work.
Quote:
An internal report at the Department of Homeland Security pegs the cost of a border wall with Mexico at $21.6 billion, far more than cost estimates put forward by President Donald Trump or congressional leadership, Reuters reported Thursday.

According to Reuters, the estimate came from a group assembled by DHS Secretary John Kelly that the news wire described as a “final step” before moving to request taxpayer funds from Congress to begin on the wall.

In February 2016, Trump claimed the barrier would cost $10 billion to 12 billion. Around the same time, the Washington Post’s fact-checkers, based on discussions with engineers and contractors, estimated the cost at $25 billion, at least.

In late January of this year, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said the wall would cost $12 to 15 billion. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) said the wall would cost up to $15 billion.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/border-wall-billions-more-than-trump-estimate
layman
 
  -4  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 09:30 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Wow. More than 2000 protesters at Chaffetz's townhall
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hundreds-chaffetz-town-hall


Quote:
I don't care. But why aren't you checking out your own president?" Noor Ul-Hasan, a Democratic activist, asked Chaffetz, per the Salt Lake Tribune.


"Noor Ul-Hasan," eh? A "Democratic" activist, you say? Well, I guess he would be that, too, by association, anyway.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 10:52 am
@layman,
How will Trump make Mexico pay? What options does he have?




NONE.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 10:54 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
(Also, the so-called "petrodollar" isn't something that anyone in America cares about.)


There are plenty who do, people significantly smarter than you. If another currency replaces the petrodollar then there will be far less need to buy dollars, (printed or in a bank account,) they'll be wanting to turn their dollars into the new petrocurrency. That will leave a lot of unwanted US dollars/securities washing about the system leading to hyperinflation.

Quote:
The petrodollar system has proven tremendously beneficial to the U.S. economy. In addition to creating a marketplace for affordable imported goods from countries who need U.S. dollars, there are more specific benefits.

In essence, America receives a double loan out of every global oil transaction.

First, oil consumers are required to purchase oil in U.S. dollars.

Second, the excess profits of the oil-producing nations are then placed into U.S. government debt securities held in Western banks.

The petrodollar system provides at least three immediate benefits to the United States.
◾It increases global demand for U.S. dollars
◾It increases global demand for U.S. debt securities
◾It gives the United States the ability to buy oil with a currency it can print at will


https://ftmdaily.com/preparing-for-the-collapse-of-the-petrodollar-part-2/<br />
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 10:58 am
@izzythepush,
It only works because the US is the strongest economy in the world. That's the reason why the Thai bot will never be the highest demand currency.
Debra Law
 
  3  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:03 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Wow. More than 2000 protesters at Chaffetz's townhall
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hundreds-chaffetz-town-hall


The resistance to corrupt political parties is growing. Millions of people of every political persuasion are taking off their blinders and demanding that our elected representatives "do their jobs" and represent ALL of the people rather than cater to the special interests (greed) of billionaires. The emperor wears no clothes and the vile corruption and greed that is working to destroy our democracy has been laid bare for all of us to see.

The resistance has a life of its own now. Regular people who used to keep their mouths shut to keep the peace within their own families and communities are now speaking out. If the republican party thinks it has the "popular mandate" to take from the poor and the underprivileged to give to the rich, they think wrong. We work hard; we pay our taxes; and we're not going to accept low levels of survival so the rich can get richer. Our lives and communities exist for greater purposes.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:07 am
@cicerone imposter,
And for as long as OPEC, (an organisation dominated by the Gulf States,) continues to price oil in dollars.

Make no mistake, the loss of the petrodollar would be catastrophic for the American economy.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:16 am
@Debra Law,
The corruption in DC has been around forever. It's amazing that it took this long for the middle class and poor to finally speak out.
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:20 am
Quote:
The resistance to corrupt political parties is growing.

That does seem to be so. The present moment, in the US, is quite encouraging. One of the key questions that arose after the election and through the inauguration was whether American institutions and civic structures would/will be up to the task of stopping and turning back authoritarianism and corruption. That is still very definitely unsettled but there are some very positive signs.

But given the very real power that the GOP now holds at federal and state levels, the left is going to lose many fights and many of those will be significant losses - to democracy, to equality, to rights, to a clean environment, to prosperity, to transparency, to rationalism, etc. That's inevitable even if Trump was somehow removed from the equation because of the extremism of the modern GOP.

It will be a slog but organized effort and maximal resistance (where appropriate, meaning almost everywhere) looks to be the way to go.

That said, let me add that the next time anyone says to me that the two parties are the same and that a Clinton administration would have been as bad as a GOP administration, I'm going to have my mother beat that person with her wheelchair.
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:23 am
Fleecing the suckers again.
Quote:
Charlie SavageVerified account
‏@charlie_savage
Republican National Committee (aka "Trump Headquarters") raising money by attacking the judiciary after the 9th Circuit ruling on travel ban
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  4  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:30 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
The resistance to corrupt political parties is growing.

That does seem to be so. The present moment, in the US, is quite encouraging.


really?

not in the US I see by way of my alternate FB account

it's eye-opening to read the comments on pages like CNN when they report on anything re Warren. death threats and the like. America looks pretty ugly these days.
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:33 am
Carl Bernstein in interview with Anderson Cooper
Quote:
...And another thing about anonymous sources, one of the great anonymous sources of our era is Kellyanne Conway. She does it every day, she has been an anonymous source for the last ten months particularly during this campaign when it suits her, and it's time to talk about what we do as journalists, and what propaganda ministers do, and that is what she is, is a propaganda minister...
MediaMatters
Uh, well yes.
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:37 am
Take a look at this:

Quote:

Report: Ex-Baylor president Ken Starr being eyed for role in Trump administration

By Nick Moyle, San Antonio Express-News Updated 6:56 am, Friday, February 10, 2017

Former Baylor president Ken Starr could join President Donald Trump’s administration.

Foreign Policy reported that Starr is on a "shortlist" of candidates being vetted for ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom.

The position, which was created by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to promote freedom of religion and monitor religious persecution abroad, is expected to take a more prominent role under Trump.

A source told the magazine that the job is Starr’s “if he wants it.”

<snip>

Starr served as Baylor’s president from 2010 to 2016. He was removed from that post after a law firm found within the university a troubling culture that disregarded, ignored and in some cases intimidated victims of on-campus sexual violence.

Starr officially resigned from his position as chancellor on June 1.

A new lawsuit filed by a Baylor graduate in January alleges 31 football players committed 52 acts of rape between 2011 and 2014.

<snip>


http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/college_sports/big_12/article/Report-Former-Baylor-president-Ken-Starr-being-10921949.php

This is absolutely disgusting. Seriously, I never dreamed that anyone in this administration would consider appointing Starr to anything. For those of you who are unfamiliar with this scandal, please use Google to learn about it. As the father of two daughters and as a Christian, I'm too sickened by the utterly vicious hypocrisy that has been practiced by a supposedly "religious" University; namely, Baylor. Texas Monthly and The Wall Street Journal, which isn't exactly a hotbed of feminists, have been among the media who have exposed this scandal. Like I said, look up the info for yourself. I don't even like to talk about this. Cover-ups of rapes have been going on in football and basketball as school sports for decades. There was a time in this country -- when I was a young man, in fact -- when these scandals wouldn't even be reported and the rape victim would have to suffer in silence.

Again, I have to say that I have never supported Hillary Clinton. I'm opposed to abortion on demand and same-sex marriage. I voted for Evan McMillan in the presidential election. Some people seem to assume that anyone and everyone who opposes Donald Trump is a supporter of the Clintons. That's downright silly.

I wasn't going to post in this topic again. I don't like Trump, but many of his detractors have problems of their own. I also agree with oralloy that unless something horribly drastic occurs during this administration, the political direction of this country has already been set for decades. So, in a sense I don't have a dog in this fight.

But dredging Ken Starr out of the gutter is another matter. This is not a political or ideological matter. This is a matter of culture and morality. I'm very much a Bible believer, but I consider the religious right to be completely overcome with hypocrisy. (Well, I guess I shouldn't be surprised. After all, the original religious right was the Ku Klux Klan.) I read recently that Jerry Falwell, Jr., has recently hired the former Athletic Director at Baylor, who was responsible for the way alleged rape victims were treated. (By the way, Notre Dame University also has a "great" record of football rape going all the way back to 1974.) I guess the football program trumps standards of decency most of the time. "Make Rape Great Again!"

blatham
 
  2  
Fri 10 Feb, 2017 11:47 am
@ehBeth,
I didn't mean to suggest that there isn't a really ugly movement growing on the right presently. That's clearly evident as well. I think a lot of this is happening because Trump/Bannon (and key elements of right wing media) have been tacitly or explicitly encouraging such people/ideologies (previously suppressed by notions of civility and rationality and by memories of past evils) to become active and militant again.

Bannon and Trump are clearly counting on this extremism and acute polarization to be the vehicle that takes them to their goals (the primary goal, power). But I think there's no option other than for the left and center and sane right to fight back against this stuff. That's why I see broad resistance as a positive and necessary phenomenon.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.98 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 10:02:03