192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Sturgis
 
  6  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 12:11 pm
@layman,
Quote:
...models ain't reliable?


As you may know, these things are created as guides to what might occur. They are projections, not meant to be 100% accurate.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  7  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 12:15 pm
@layman,
If the model is correct Id be very happy but it wont end with only an emergency lockdown. Those numbers will only be reached if all goes according to the input VARIABLES.
Models are iterative and they can change on a dime(look how all the models disagreed on several Hurricanes). Were the president really interested in handling the pandemic rather than campaigning over my life, we could make the numbers. Hes not giving a simple ****, and because he lives on his polls he can see his numbers are falling.


We could be in target for a reinfestation like happened during the Spanish Flu..


When is he going to begin to understand the need for significant testing???

Those models aint worth **** without data. They are mathhematical estimates.not gazes into a crystal ball.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -4  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 12:21 pm
All these greedy-ass state governors want to get their filthy mitts on as much in federal funds as possible, and they don't mind lyin to get it.

M.D's have reported that they are being told to ignore pre-existing guidelines for filling out death certificates, and to list the Kung Flu as a cause of death, even if they don't know, or don't believe, that it is.

More cash for the State that way, see?
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 12:56 pm
Quote:
You've been there? Do tell us more

I saw no signs of violence in the picture you posted. Why even ask such a ridiculous thing?
Quote:
Who talked about violence?

I just did, that is who.
layman
 
  -3  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 12:58 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Why even ask such a ridiculous thing?

Because he's Walt, that's why.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Sturgis
 
  6  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 01:13 pm
@layman,
Quote:
...9 downvotes...


You might want to develop a new hobby.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 01:18 pm
@layman,
Or you've hit a nereve when you post absolute bilge, which is far more likely.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 01:35 pm
Biden has been interviewed over 10 times since the accusation of sexual assault against him became public. Not ONE MSM reporter has asked him a question about it. Could someone explain why not?
Quote:
Free Beacon: After Three Weeks, Media Still Isn’t Asking Joe Biden About That Alleged Sexual Assault

https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/16/joe-biden-media-sexual-assault-tara-reade/
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 02:01 pm
@snood,
Quote:
The most economically, scientifically, and technologically advanced country on the planet is ranked 38th in tests per person.


@JoeNBC?? The US of A only makes it to fifth place in actual polls not conducted in the US of A.

Nice try, kid, but again, no banana.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  7  
Sun 19 Apr, 2020 02:13 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
That is the part the MSM will not explain. Many people die with it, not from it. Which leaves us with a totally unreliable numbers to determine mortality rate. Which, when it does emerge, will make us look like fools for not protecting the vulnerable and continuing normal life.


This is the silliest thing to say. It's like saying people died with cancer, not from it, to downplay the rate cancer kills.
Below viewing threshold (view)
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 09/27/2022 at 10:05:00