@Builder,
Builder wrote:
Quote:It's not about your Clinton fixation
It was more about Obama's insolence, and him blaming his "poor judgement" on his SoS than any kind of fixation in your imagination. It's not my place to be thinking about your fixation on my posts. Sorry 'bout that.
I didn't mention Clinton at all. Projection much?
Builder wrote:
Quote:It didn't level the playing field, it skewed it in favor of the small states.
The EC does not skew the decision in any one direction. Your claim was that it gives the small states greater influence, when clearly it does not. You still haven't justified that claim, despite ten attempts now. Knock yourself out.
It's weighted towards the small states, hence it's skewed.
Builder wrote:
Quote:This isn't about California.
If your focus is on the popular vote, then it most certainly
is about
Cali.
Your focus is solely on the 2016 election, and California's involvement in it. There are other instances where the Electoral College didn't correspond with the popular vote.
Builder wrote:
Quote:What's beyond your grasp is the fact that "united" comprehends California.
Why would comprehending Cali be beyond my grasp?
Extrapolate on that claim of yours.
Instead, I'll restate it for you. The irony of your "united" comment, in regard to your singling out of the state of California, escapes you.