192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:32 pm
@oralloy,
so glad you approve of my showing tha snood was right and ou were wrong. good onya.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:36 pm
@MontereyJack,
You did not show that I was wrong in any way whatsoever.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:40 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
the evidence shows that it was manslaughter at the very least, and most likely murder.

That is incorrect. The evidence shows that it was pure self defense.


MontereyJack wrote:
the jurors were there. thery know what the triasl showed., and they don't agree with you. they have some authority in the matter, yhou don't.

Appeals to authority fallacies will not change the reality that the evidence shows a clear case of self defense.


MontereyJack wrote:
and if it walks and quacks like a duck.....

Falsely accusations of racism really are no substitute for facts and logic.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:43 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Trump vdery publicly asked putin to meddle in the election and putin was happy to oblige. Simple fact.

It's not a fact. Putin's meddling has nothing to do with any imagined request from the Mr. Trump.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:44 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
the graphic he posted was nonsense.

It looked like fair criticism of progressive malfeasance to me.

Why do progressives hate America so much?
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:45 pm
@oralloy,
Not imagined. he did, putin did.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:46 pm
@MontereyJack,
Putin's meddling has nothing to do with anything that Mr. Trump said either publicly or privately.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:50 pm
@oralloy,
the malfeasance is trumps.. rhe criticcism was incredibly biased opinion. rhe graphic was nonsense. that you think it was fair is a fair indication okf how twisted your opinions have become.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:52 pm
@oralloy,
Progressives love America. They hate the destruction that trump and conservatives are weaking upon it.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:53 pm
@oralloy,
nonsense.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:55 pm
@MontereyJack,
No nonsense. Putin's meddling has nothing to do with Mr. Trump.

https://patcrosscartoons.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/645e4c95-8c7b-4ffa-97a2-c49aa800c088.jpeg
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:57 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Progressives love America. They hate the destruction that trump and conservatives are weaking upon it.

If progressives cared about America they would not be trying to violate our civil liberties for fun.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 29 Jan, 2020 09:58 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
the malfeasance is trumps..

Progressives are the ones who are trying to violate people's civil liberties for fun.

Mr. Trump is merely protecting America from progressives and preventing them from harming us.


MontereyJack wrote:
the criticcism was incredibly biased opinion. the graphic was nonsense. that you think it was fair is a fair indication of how twisted your opinions have become.

Opinions are neither right nor wrong. They are opinions.

If I think that progressives are terrible people for trying to violate people's civil liberties for fun, I'm not wrong to think that.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Thu 30 Jan, 2020 12:53 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Trump vdery publicly asked putin to meddle in the election and putin was happy to oblige. Simple fact. Question is, what does trump owe putin for his help?


That's news to me. Care to share some evidence to back that claim, MJ?

I'm seeing no love between Putin and the US president today. None at all.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 30 Jan, 2020 12:58 am
Maybe someone else should make up the rules besides Democrats.

Quote:
Impeachment Needs a Replay Booth
An acquittal should allow a president to run for a third term.

Quote:
The ill-considered impeachment efforts against President Donald Trump have seriously interfered with his first term as president. Thus, argues constitutional scholar William Mattox in The Wall Street Journal, if acquitted, Trump should be eligible for a third term, notwithstanding the two-term limit in the 22nd Amendment.

Sounds good.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/impeachment-needs-a-replay-booth-11571872105?mod=e2two

Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 30 Jan, 2020 01:51 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Maybe someone else should make up the rules besides Democrats.
Only Democrats make Amendments?

But it's really an interesting idea to adopt National Football League rules as Amendments. (Seems to be still on discussion, since that quoted opinion is from last October.)
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Thu 30 Jan, 2020 02:03 am
@coldjoint,
Trump should be president for life. After him, one if his sons should reign.
Builder
 
  -1  
Thu 30 Jan, 2020 02:12 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Trump should be president for life.


I'm surprised he hasn't been Martin Luther'd or JFK'd yet.

Maybe the CIA is so disjointed (much like the DNC) after HRC had her way with them.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 30 Jan, 2020 06:40 am
@glitterbag,
Of course.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Thu 30 Jan, 2020 06:43 am
Part of Trump's impenetrable wall just blew over in a 35mph wind.NYMag
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.72 seconds on 11/27/2024 at 08:43:30