192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
glitterbag
 
  4  
Mon 20 Jan, 2020 11:36 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

oralloy wrote:

snood wrote:
Who decides which guns the government has a "compelling interest" in restricting?

In theory, the Supreme Court. But in practice is it usually the NRA.


A special interest group decides which weapons the government has a compelling reason to regulate?


Oh Yeah, the NRA....the organization that pays no frigging taxes and funds election campaigns.....those folks.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 20 Jan, 2020 11:47 pm
@glitterbag,
They're the people who defend our freedom and keep us free.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Mon 20 Jan, 2020 11:48 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:


Quote:
No. He bequeathed it to the rest of us.

Then doesn't he have to pass over, check out, meet his maker, and he will have of stopped lying then, before that happens?


But then he would actually have to pass over, but he hasn't. Please check the dictionary for a definition. Bequeathed does not mean 'coldjoiunt' who never starts a thread, gets control of mini-minds get to take over. Why do you find blathem so threatening? Are you just weak willed?
glitterbag
 
  4  
Mon 20 Jan, 2020 11:49 pm
@McGentrix,
just racists and those with an authoritarian tilt.....Seig Heil
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 20 Jan, 2020 11:51 pm
@glitterbag,
The way progressives demonize peaceful protests for civil liberties is pretty despicable.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 20 Jan, 2020 11:54 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
Why do you find blathem so threatening?

Who says anyone finds him threatening?

Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


glitterbag wrote:
Are you just weak willed?

Weak willed people give in to progressives when they demand that everyone ignore reality.

Conservatives are not weak willed. We reject progressivism and all of the hate that it brings to the world.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 12:07 am
@Builder,
trump keeps being beaten by biden in head to head matchups. Trumps has never had support of the majority. Which is why he lost the vote in 2016 and why he'll lose in 2020.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 12:12 am
@glitterbag,
Quote:
Why do you find blathem so threatening?

I find Blatham to be what he has shown himself to be. A guy who wishes people dead while virtue signaling. A guy who has used more gutter talk than Trump could ever keep up with. And a liar.

Threatening, no, not at all. Just someone lacking all kinds of character.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 12:15 am
@oralloy,
You don't have the sy on what a compelling interest is. State legislatues have decided there is a compelling interest in banning assault-style weaoons. The courts have let those laws stand. They have accepted the argument that there is a compelling interest in banning them. Your opinion has no weight. Deservedly.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 12:22 am
https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Screen-Shot-2020-01-20-at-6.25.16-PM-998x726.png
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 12:40 am
@coldjoint,
84 % of VA voters favor background checks. 73% favor red fag laws. The very things the demonstrators were against. A majority want to ban assault tyle weapons. Lotta marchers in VA yesterday but they're not representative of the actual opinion of the state.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/cnu-poll-virginia-voters-strongly-back-gun-control-laws/ar-BBZ9Feq
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 12:42 am
@MontereyJack,
I liked the sign. The Right is tolerant and non-violent.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 01:04 am
@coldjoint,
You are a shining example.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 01:20 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
You don't have the say on what a compelling interest is.

Luckily the concept is already well defined, so I don't have to define it. All I have to do is point out your failure to provide any compelling government interest.


MontereyJack wrote:
State legislatues have decided there is a compelling interest in banning assault-style weapons.

They aren't assault weapons. They are ordinary hunting rifles.

Decreeing that you have a compelling government interest doesn't cut it. You have to actually be able to present a compelling government interest.

I know progressives have this delusion that reality is whatever they say that it is at a given moment, but the world doesn't actually work that way.


MontereyJack wrote:
The courts have let those laws stand. They have accepted the argument that there is a compelling interest in banning them.

Wrong. Not hearing a case does not mean a decision one way or another. It only means that the Supreme Court has not taken up the case yet.

And Justice Kavanaugh has a strong history of protecting the Second Amendment on the lower courts. He'll do quite well on the Supreme Court.

https://prospect.org/justice/judge-kavanaugh-s-extremist-position-second-amendment/


MontereyJack wrote:
Your opinion has no weight. Deservedly.

Wrong again. While progressives may wish that America was a dictatorship, it remains a democracy, and I get to vote in it.

Further, the reality that I can back my arguments with actual facts makes my views much more persuasive than your claims that you never back up.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 01:21 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
A majority want to ban assault style weapons.

They aren't assault weapons. They are ordinary hunting rifles.

These people don't care about saving lives. They only want to violate people's civil liberties for fun. The Constitution overrules their desires.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 01:22 am
MontereyJack wrote:
A majority want to ban assault style weapons.

That is incorrect. They are trying to ban ordinary hunting rifles.

It doesn't really matter what these people want. The Constitution overrules their desire to violate people's civil liberties for fun.
Builder
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 01:51 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
The Constitution overrules their desire to violate people's civil liberties for fun.


The Patriot Act shat all over civil liberties, but left guns alone.

Bush signed it into law, and Obama continued it.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 01:52 am
They interviewed two of the marchers on the BBC. They were the stupidest most inbred things I've ever seen, completely incapable of answering a question, just repeating mindless mantras.

Just like the slobbering NRA supporters on here, stupid, inbred and full of fear and ****.

The Master Race? You're having a laugh.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 01:56 am
@revelette3,


From Al Jazeera.

Quote:
Three Katyusha rockets fell on Tuesday inside Baghdad's Green Zone, which houses government buildings and foreign missions, Iraqi police sources told Reuters.

The three rockets were launched from Zafaraniyah district outside Baghdad, the sources said, adding that two rockets landed near the United States embassy

Sirens could be heard across the zone immediately after the rockets made impact.

The US has blamed Iran-backed paramilitary groups for a spate of similar attacks in recent months on the Green Zone, but there has never been a claim of responsibility.

Tensions in Iraq have risen since the US assassinated Qassem Soleimani, an Iranian military commander, in Baghdad on January 3.

That killing came amid widespread anti-Iraq government demonstrations, which are continuing.

Five protesters were killed on Monday in three Iraqi cities as demonstrators across the country ramped up pressure on the government to implement long-awaited reforms.

The United Nations envoy to Iraq urged Iraqi political elites to resume pushing for reforms and for protests to remain peaceful.

"Any steps taken so far to address the people's concerns will remain hollow if they are not completed," said envoy Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert in a statement issued by the UN. "Violent suppression of peaceful protesters is intolerable and must be avoided at all costs."


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/01/rockets-fall-baghdad-green-zone-200120221143333.html
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2020 05:52 am
@oralloy,
Why do you keep posting this stupid false stuff?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.48 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 11:29:34