192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 10:55 am
@revelette3,
Quote:
Trump Legal Team to Add Starr and Dershowitz for Senate Trial

Politico has a thorough analysis of the Trump legal team We ought to note that most of these people are FOX regulars. Big surprise there.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 11:29 am
You all likely know that McConnell has established very tight control over media coverage and media contact with Senators. Why? Consider this graph from a WP article this morning
Quote:
McConnell got the day’s ending he had hoped for, a Senate looking somber and serious as it conducts President Trump’s impeachment trial. A Senate that might, as he put it a day before, be capable of rising above “short-termism and factional fever.”


Here's what I think is the motivation. McConnell and the WH want to create a particular story for media consumption which draws a contrast between the House investigation and the Senate trial. In this story, the House investigation will be portrayed as a "political circus" marked by vicious partisan attacks all as cover for an illegitimate coup. The Senate trial, by contrast, will be portrayed as a somber, serious and unbiased address to the matter.

This framing, already begun, will also be used to invalidate calls for new witnesses and evidence which will be described as attempts by the partisan Dems to carry their "circus" antics into the Senate. McConnell will bravely and steadfastly resist such partisan attempts to corrupt government and the will of the people.
revelette3
 
  3  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 11:38 am
@blatham,
Your take could be exactly right.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 11:50 am
This WP piece is a must read for everyone. The graph below is just a taste. It gets much worse.
Quote:
By that point, six months into his administration, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Director of the National Economic Council Gary Cohn, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had grown alarmed by gaping holes in Trump’s knowledge of history, especially the key alliances forged following World War II. Trump had dismissed allies as worthless, cozied up to authoritarian regimes in Russia and elsewhere, and advocated withdrawing troops from strategic outposts and active theaters alike.
HERE
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 12:06 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Director of the National Economic Council Gary Cohn, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson

Obama fired Mattis. Tillerson and Cohn are not, and will never be president. Their opinions are only right to people who agree with them. Those who agree are not the president either. Trump is doing his job and second guessing him and criticism will not change him or his policies. Next.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 12:21 pm
Quote:
Seven Times the GAO Found the Obama Administration Violated Federal Law

Looks like the GAO was roundly ignored by the Obama administration. Also ignored by the Congress. What makes the GOA so important now? The answer is nothing, but Trump is the president now.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/16/seven-times-the-gao-found-the-obama-administration-violated-federal-law/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 12:30 pm
Quote:
GAO HIT PIECE on TRUMP GETS IT WRONG

Quote:
CONGRESS RESCINDED THE APPROPRIATION:

Then GAO gives away its argument again. Incredibly, the GAO “Decision” reveals that Congress actually rescinded the appropriation in question.

OMB removed the footnote from the apportionment for the USAI funds on September 12, 2019. OMB Response, at 2. Prior to their expiration, Congress then rescinded and reappropriated the funds. Continuing Appropriations Act, 2020, Pub. L. No. 116-59, div. A, § 124(b), 133 Stat. 1093, 1098 (Sept. 27, 2019).

Because the Ukraine appropriation was rescinded by Congress —legally what happened earlier is largely moot. This undermines the accusations.

Looks like this is another nothing, media hype again. No research, just negative hype.
https://canadafreepress.com/article/gao-hit-piece-on-trump-gets-it-wrong#.XiGp3OqxdyU.twitter
oralloy
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 12:42 pm
@coldjoint,
That reminds me of Ronald Reagan's covert funding of the Contra freedom fighters in Central America.

a) Congress barred aid to the Contras in an effort to help Communism stamp out freedom south of the US.

b) Reagan ignored Congress and kept aid flowing.

c) Congress realized that Communism really is bad after all, and resumed aid to the Contras.

d) Then Congress learned that Reagan had kept aid flowing throughout, and they threw a tantrum even though they themselves had just voted to resume aid to the Contra freedom fighters.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 12:45 pm
Quote:
Trump in 1999: Ken Starr Is a ‘Freak’ and ‘I Bet He’s Got Something in His Closet’
Law and Chrime
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 12:52 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Trump in 1999:

That says it all. It is 2020 and he is president. Irrelevant, as we all know, thanks to Obama, how people evolve. Trump can evolve too.
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  1  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:08 pm
@blatham,
I now know what is on my next reading list. However, for these loyal deplorables, they will side with Trump over the generals and the men and women who served in those loser wars.

Edit: I thought it ok to use deplorables in this sense, since it seems to be a badge of honor among some Trump supporters.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:24 pm
@revelette3,
My philosophy is more in line with John Bolton when it comes to foreign policy. But without Mr. Trump to protect America, progressives are going to wantonly violate everyone's civil liberties.

Everything else is secondary to the need to protect America from progressives.
farmerman
 
  3  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:32 pm
@oralloy,
Looks like we will have to protect ourselves from Gun-nut militias if going to Richmond this weekend. Several militias and "2nd amendment chaos" folks have threatened violence if the people visiting are told to keep the town gun free this weekend.

I cant see the argument about "protecting our rights to self protection" if those very people are the ones threatening the violence..
izzythepush
 
  2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:43 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

I cant see the argument about "protecting our rights to self protection" if those very people are the ones threatening the violence..


In those circumstances the police have a duty to shoot anyone carrying a firearm.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:48 pm
If things weren't dangerous enough already.

Quote:
When it comes to safeguarding the wellbeing of planet Earth, fossil fuels are an increasingly controversial energy source. Nuclear is arguably more so, given the experience of Chernobyl and the potential to convert civilian nuclear technology to military uses.

Those risks become even more ominous when a nuclear power plant is introduced into a tinderbox of geopolitical rivalries like the Arabian Peninsula.

But that's where the region is headed

This week, the world learned that after years of delays, the United Arab Emirates is set to bring the first of four nuclear reactors in the Al Dhafra Region of Abu Dhabi online by the end of March.

The UAE's nuclear power plant is named Barakah - Arabic for "divine blessing". That is how UAE Minister of State Sultan bin Ahmad Sultan Al Jaber spun it at the Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week conference, telling reporters earlier this week "we will become the first country in the region to deliver safe, commercial and peaceful nuclear power".

But some nuclear experts are not so sanguine, and are warning of the potential curse that could be unleashed by Barakah, from a nuclear arms race to environmental catastrophe.

A recent report by Paul Dorfman, chair of the non-profit Nuclear Consulting Group, titled Gulf Nuclear Ambition: New Reactors in the United Arab Emirates, highlights myriad risks inherent in Barakah's design.

Among the most prominent reds flags is the firm that won the contract to build Barakah - Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO), which clinched the deal with a bid that was "spectacularly low, about 30% lower than the next cheapest bid," the report says.

That bargain-basement price was made possible, the report notes, thanks to a lack of "key improved safety design features" normally expected on new European reactors but missing from those built by KEPCO.

Such features include a so-called "core catcher" to prevent the nuclear reactor core from breaching the containment building in the event of a meltdown and other defences to guard against a significant radiation release in the event of an accident or deliberate attack on the facility.

Further compounding these omissions, says the report, is "the discovery of cracking in all 4 reactor containment buildings" and the installation of faulty valves - all of which cast doubt over the UAE's ability to provide "adequate nuclear regulation".

The UAE is the only country that has purchased a KEPCO reactor. But if it proves unable to contain radioactive fallout resulting from an accident or attack, this won't just be a problem for the Emirates.

Radioactive fallout travels, and the UAE's neighbours are already voicing concerns.

In March, Qatar's foreign affairs ministry reportedly sent a letter to the International Atomic Energy Agency saying that a radioactive plume from an accidental discharge could reach its capital, Doha, within five to 13 hours - and a radiation leak could devastate the Gulf's water supply due to the region's heavy reliance on desalination plants.


Despite the UAE's insistence that its nuclear ambitions are peaceful, concerns about the potential for proliferation abound given the geopolitical rifts between neighbouring Gulf countries and the recent ratcheting up of tensions in the Middle East.

This month, fears of a military escalation engulfing the Middle East were heightened after the United States assassinated Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in an air attack and Tehran retaliated with missile attacks on US airbases in Iraq.

Qatar is currently the subject of an ongoing diplomatic, trade and transport blockade by the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Egypt over allegations that Doha supports "terrorism" and is too close to Iran. Qatar has rejected such claims.

In September, a drone attack on Saudi Aramco's oil facilities raised serious concerns about the vulnerability of the region's energy infrastructure to assaults.

"As recent military strikes against Saudi oil refineries infer, nuclear safety revolves around the broader issue of security," notes Dorfman in his report, "especially since belligerent armed groups may view UAE military operations as a reason to target nuclear installations or intercept enriched uranium fuel or waste transfers nationally or regionally."

Such warnings have not deterred the UAE from pressing ahead and sticking to the script. Abu Dhabi continues to insists its nuclear programme is grounded in transparency, safety, security, sustainability and international cooperation.

The region can only hope those principals are enforced as UAE pulls the Arabian Peninsula across the nuclear threshold.


https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/uae-nuclear-reactors-imperil-gulf-200117180846816.html
glitterbag
 
  3  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:48 pm
@farmerman,
It's a version of "Look what you made me do?" usually screamed out in anger after a man beats his wife. (Yes, I know women have also used this dodge when they beat their husbands, boyfriends, children) It is too exhausting to list every possible situation where an abuser beats their target of abuse
farmerman
 
  2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:48 pm
@izzythepush,
naaah. That jut what th gun nutz like.They like martyrs. The Va law has several neat codicils ezpecially the steep fines and confiscation of property
izzythepush
 
  2  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 01:52 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:

(Yes, I know women have also used this dodge when they beat their husbands, boyfriends, children) It is too exhausting to list every possible situation where an abuser beats their target of abuse


Thanks to Max people are having to add all this unnecessary stuff otherwise he'll have a hissy fit for the next couple of pages.

And he's the one complaining about political correctness.
glitterbag
 
  3  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 02:04 pm
@izzythepush,
The Governor of Virginia has declared a State of Emergency and issued a temporary ban on guns at this rally. The FBI is also involved and has arrested 3 men who belong to a white Neo nazi group called "The Base"
oralloy
 
  -3  
Fri 17 Jan, 2020 02:28 pm
@glitterbag,
Progressives don't like the idea of peaceful protesters opposing their draconian policies.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 04:26:20