196
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Real Music
 
  3  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 12:46 am
Crowd erupts in laughter as Jim Jordan humiliated at impeachment hearing.

BREAKING: The crowd just erupted in laughter as Jim Jordan humiliated himself at Trump’s impeachment hearing.


Published November 13, 2019

glitterbag
 
  3  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 01:01 am
@Real Music,
Yeah, Jim Jordan is a fantastic addition to these hearings......
Real Music
 
  2  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 01:20 am
@glitterbag,
Jim Jordan is essentially a circus clown who is attempting to turn this serious impeachment hearing into a circus.

I am thankful that flunky Jim Jordan haven't been allowed to succeed at his "Bozo the Clown" tactics.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  2  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 02:03 am
@glitterbag,
Yeah. I'm honestly glad he showed up.
glitterbag
 
  3  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 02:07 am
@roger,
I agree with you Roger.....Initially I was pissed that they slipped in a doofus.....but I forgot what a big doofus ass-hat he is.......
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 03:25 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Itd be best if Trump would just xercise a big portion of STFU

Witch hunters don't like it when their intended victims try to defend themselves.
Below viewing threshold (view)
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 05:51 am
@oralloy,
It's pretty clear by now that trump's interest in Ukraine had nothing to do with corruption there but everything to do with abuse of power on his part for purely personal political gain.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 05:52 am
@oralloy,
Never been a witch hunt. Trump and his lackeys have repeatedly been shown to be guilty.
blatham
 
  1  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 06:18 am
As someone on twitter remarked, Schiff ought to have suggested to Jordan that he head for the showers.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 06:28 am
Give me money that's what I want
Quote:
National Rifle Association chief executive Wayne LaPierre, who pushed past scattered calls for his resignation earlier this year amid allegations of misspending, received a 57 percent pay raise in 2018 that boosted his overall compensation to $2.15 million, according to the nonprofit group’s latest tax filings.
WP

He's a domestic weapons dealer. It would be such a pity if bullets slammed into his torso rather than some black kid jaywalking.
snood
 
  3  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 07:44 am
@blatham,
Yeah, a frikkin tragedy.
snood
 
  4  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 07:47 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

farmerman wrote:
Itd be best if Trump would just xercise a big portion of STFU

Witch hunters don't like it when their intended victims try to defend themselves.

There were republicans who saw, and stated that he didn’t help himself when he attacked the witness during her questioning. Hell, Stevie Wonder could see that.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
 
  -4  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 08:26 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
It's pretty clear by now that trump's interest in Ukraine had nothing to do with corruption there but everything to do with abuse of power on his part for purely personal political gain.

Democrats would like it if it were actually an abuse of power to investigate their crimes. They've wanted to be above the law for a long time now.

It's a good thing for the rest of us that it's not.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 09:37 am
Saw this in the shops today, lots of fart based children's games around now. Only to be expected when you've got a president named after anal gas.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ew_ZMnlD_24/W98EZZoSZQI/AAAAAAAEfl0/46dmSOmbfn0zVOQPOKUsCjEV79Q11bpiwCLcBGAs/s1600/Trumping%2BTrudy%2BFamily%2BGame%2BReview%2Band%2BGiveaway%2BAge%2B4%252B%2B%2528sent%2Bby%2BKD%2BGames%2529.jpg
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  4  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 10:12 am
Quote:
WASHINGTON — An official from the United States Embassy in Kiev confirmed to House impeachment investigators on Friday that he had overheard a call between President Trump and a top American diplomat in July in which the president asked whether Ukraine was going to move forward with an investigation he wanted.

The official, David Holmes, testified privately that he was at a restaurant in Kiev, Ukraine’s capital, when he overheard Mr. Trump on a cellphone call loudly asking Gordon D. Sondland, the American ambassador to the European Union, if Ukraine’s president had agreed to conduct an investigation into one of his leading political rivals. Mr. Sondland, who had just come from a meeting with top Ukrainian officials and the country’s president, replied in the affirmative.

“So, he’s going to do the investigation?” Mr. Trump asked, according to a copy of Mr. Holmes’s opening statement posted by CNN and confirmed by The New York Times.

Mr. Sondland, a wealthy hotelier and political donor turned ambassador, told Mr. Trump that President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine “loves your ass,” and would conduct the investigation and do “anything you ask him to,” according to Mr. Holmes’s statement.

After the call ended, Mr. Holmes asked if it was true that the president did not care about Ukraine. Mr. Sondland, he testified, agreed. According to Mr. Holmes’s account, the ambassador said Mr. Trump cared only about the “big stuff.” Mr. Holmes noted Ukraine had “big stuff” going on, like a war with Russia.

But Mr. Sondland had something else in mind. He told Mr. Holmes he meant “‘big stuff’ that benefits the president,” like the “Biden investigation” that his lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani was pushing for, because it affected him personally.

The account could prove significant as Democrats continue to build an impeachment case against Mr. Trump. It illustrates how preoccupied he was with persuading Ukraine’s president to go along with his demand that the country commit publicly to investigating former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a leading political rival, and how he actively used his power and the instruments of American foreign policy to see that it happened.

It adds significant new detail to a conversation that was first revealed on Wednesday during public testimony by Mr. Holmes’s boss, William B. Taylor Jr., the top American envoy in Ukraine. Mr. Taylor said then that he had only recently learned of the episode from Mr. Holmes. And it raised the possibility that Mr. Holmes could be called to testify publicly in the impeachment inquiry and presented Democrats with new leads to track down even as they conduct a string of high-profile public hearings with other witnesses.

Mr. Holmes, a career Foreign Service officer who is the political counselor in the American Embassy in Kiev, said he had been following the impeachment inquiry from afar in recent weeks and came to understand only belatedly that he had pertinent information to share. He testified under subpoena by the House Intelligence Committee after the State Department directed him not to appear, according to an official working on the inquiry.

“I came to realize I had firsthand knowledge regarding certain events on July 26 that had not otherwise been reported, and that those events potentially bore on the question of whether the president did, in fact, have knowledge that those officials were using the levers of our diplomatic power to induce the new Ukrainian president to announce the opening of a particular criminal investigation,” he testified.

Mr. Holmes’s account of the relationship between the two countries in his opening statement was broader, though, and closely resembles that offered by other top officials who have offered public and private testimony to the House.

He described how Mr. Sondland and two other American officials — Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Kurt D. Volker, the United States special envoy to Ukraine — styled themselves as the “Three Amigos” and took charge of Ukraine policy within the administration. On the outside, Mr. Giuliani exercised significant influence over what they did.

“Beginning in March 2019, the situation in the embassy and in Ukraine changed dramatically,” Mr. Holmes said, according to his statement. “Specifically, our diplomatic policy that had been focused on supporting Ukrainian democratic reform and resistance to Russian aggression became overshadowed by a political agenda being promoted by Rudy Giuliani and a cadre of officials operating with a direct channel to the White House.”

The conversation between Mr. Trump and Mr. Sondland took place on July 26, one day after Mr. Trump personally pressed Mr. Zelensky in a now-famous phone call to investigate Mr. Biden and his son Hunter Biden, as well as unproven allegations that Ukraine conspired with Democrats to interfere in the 2016 election. Mr. Trump specifically wanted an investigation into unsubstantiated corruption allegations related to Hunter Biden’s work for a Ukrainian energy firm, Burisma Holdings.

Mr. Sondland did not mention the episode to investigators last month when he answered their questions in private. He will almost certainly be asked about it next week when he appears for public testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.

He has already revised his initial testimony once, admitting to the panel last week that he told a top Ukrainian official that the country would probably not receive a package of nearly $400 million in security assistance Mr. Trump froze in July unless it committed publicly to the investigations Mr. Trump sought. And Republicans have argued that he may be overstating his access to and influence with the president.

On Thursday, two people familiar with the matter said that a second embassy official, Suriya Jayanti, also overheard the call and could corroborate Mr. Holmes’s account. It is unclear if investigators will also call her to testify. On Friday, Mr. Holmes indicated there was a third person present who would have overheard it, as well.

Mr. Holmes told investigators that he did not take notes during the conversation, but said he immediately told other embassy officials about it.

The conversation took place not long after Mr. Sondland had met directly with Mr. Zelensky and other officials. Mr. Holmes’s account gave hints that Mr. Trump’s request may have been on Mr. Zelensky’s mind, but it does not indicate what, if anything, he or his aides may have communicated to Mr. Sondland. In the meeting, Mr. Holmes recalled, Mr. Zelensky said that Mr. Trump had raised “some very sensitive issues” “three times” on the call — issues the Ukrainian leader noted they would have to follow up on in person.
Mr. Holmes described sitting on the terrace of a Kiev restaurant a little while later during lunch with Mr. Sondland, sharing a bottle of wine, when Mr. Sondland called Mr. Trump. The president was speaking so loudly, he said, that Mr. Sondland held the phone away from his ear and Mr. Holmes and others could hear Mr. Trump’s voice.

In addition to discussing the investigations, Mr. Trump and Mr. Sondland discussed ASAP Rocky, an American rapper imprisoned in Sweden at the time on charges of assault. Mr. Sondland told the president the rapper “should have pled guilty,” according to Mr. Holmes’s written statement.
Mr. Sondland then advised Mr. Trump that he should “let him get sentenced, play the racism card, give him a ticker-tape when he comes home,” Mr. Holmes testified. The ambassador added that Sweden “should have released him on your word,” and added, referring to an American reality show celebrity family pressing for Mr. Trump’s help in the case, “you can tell the Kardashians you tried.”

Mr. Sondland noted after the call that the president was in a “bad mood.”
Mr. Holmes’s account included other potentially significant details new to investigators about Trump administration officials using a White House meeting and the frozen military assistance as leverage for what Mr. Trump wanted. He testified that Mr. Taylor told him at the time about a June 28 call with him, the “Three Amigos” and Mr. Zelensky in which “it was made clear that some action on a Burisma/Biden investigation was a precondition for an Oval Office meeting.”

Mr. Taylor described the same call in his testimony, saying that Mr. Sondland had said he “wanted to make sure no one was transcribing or monitoring” the call. But Mr. Taylor did not say that investigations or preconditions had been discussed.

“It is important to understand that a White House visit was critical to President Zelensky,” Mr. Holmes said. “He needed to demonstrate U.S. support at the highest levels both to advance his ambitious anti-corruption agenda at home and to encourage Russian President Putin to take seriously President Zelensky’s peace efforts.”

By late summer, Mr. Holmes testified, he had a “clear impression” that a hold on the military aid was also “likely intended by the president either to express dissatisfaction that the Ukrainians had not yet agreed to the Burisma/Biden investigations or as an effort to increase the pressure on them to do so.”

Mr. Holmes also described frustrations among American officials.
At one point, he said, Mr. Sondland vented: “Dammit, Rudy. Every time Rudy gets involved he goes and f—s everything up.”

He said that John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser, openly discussed strategies for marginalizing Mr. Giuliani on a trip to Kiev during the summer. Mr. Holmes testified that he also complained about Mr. Sondland’s “expansive interpretation of his mandate.” And he recalled Mr. Bolton saying that a hold on the security assistance would be lifted only if Mr. Zelensky could “favorably impress” during a face-to-face meeting scheduled for early September. The meeting never happened.
Other witnesses have described similar concerns by Mr. Bolton, and investigators would like to speak with him, but he has declined to appear given White House orders not to.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/15/us/politics/trump-ambassador-sondland-ukraine-call.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 10:17 am
@revelette3,
Hearsay. Again. The presidents makes foreign policy. No one cares if State Dept. people disagree. That is not their job. Their job is to carry out the policy the president wants. That simple.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 11:30 am
Quote:
“Everywhere She Went Turned Bad,” Says Man with Six Bankruptcies

“She started off in Somalia, how did that go?” tweeted the man, who paid twenty-five million dollars to settle fraud charges against a fake university bearing his name.
Andy Borowitz
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Sat 16 Nov, 2019 11:41 am
What is to be done about the problem of creepy men?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.17 seconds on 01/20/2021 at 11:10:05