@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Thanks for your explanation. You know, I wasn't criticizing you, I just wasn't sure of your meaning. Do you think that, regardless of "the legal issues involved", simply dismissing lawfully issued subpoenas — stonewalling — should be a standard practice when members of an administration are suspected of wrongdoing?
Thanks to you as well. There are a number of "standard practices" recently developed of which I don't approve. One is the now two year ongoing and relentless campaign by the Democrat Congressional leadership to find SOME basis on which to impeach the President - in effect a prosecution in which, in the eyes of its protagonists, the outcome is already known, and only the specific charges remain to be determined. Another is the complete refusal of Democrats in the Congress to join with Republicans in addressing key current national issues ranging from immigration to energy policy and infrastructure development. Republicans here aren't much better, and as a result our Legislature is seriously dysfunctional.
I do find the ongoing whistleblower controversy to be the result of a contrived and well-coordinated campaign likely based on leaks within the bureaucracies, and not the spontaneous act of a whistleblower acting alone. Indeed his/her published report/complaint reeks of legal and political content and preparation. Overall it appears to involve efforts similar to those that defined the two year Mueller Investigation which went to great lengths in efforts to find collusion with Russian efforts to affect our election, but only to the extent they involved Trump. Strangely it focused not at all on the part of the Clinton Campaign, which actively funded and assisted in the funding and dissemination of the Russian sourced "dossier" on Trump, which was a key foundation element in the Mueller investigation.
Finally the overwrought indignation of the Democrats over all things Trump is beginning to look a little silly compared to stuff now emerging from among the Democrat contenders. I believe the contrast there is beginning to be fairly widely noted by many people. Not a good indicator.