monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

I haven't seen much in the way of the inclusiveness to which you referred among the Democrat Presidential contenders.

Trump’s trips to Mar-a-Lago cost $3 million each and he went every other week.

Election experts endorse Cory Booker’s explanation for Trump winning Michigan

...Reports from former special counsel Robert Mueller and the Senate
Intelligence Committee outlined how a “troll farm” called the Internet Research Agency, which has close ties to the Kremlin, made a coordinated effort on social media to suppress the black vote in 2016. African Americans tend to vote overwhelmingly for Democrats.

There is reason to believe those Russian efforts worked. A new study from researchers at the University of Tennessee found that social media posts and disinformation spread by Russian troll farms influenced how Americans responded to opinion polls before the 2016 election.

Michigan voters were also hampered that year by Republican legislative maneuvers to suppress minority turnout.

You point to the current Dem primary debates and apparently suggest that the current contest between "progressives" and "choose your term" is marked by the first category "shouting down" others - thus the first category are "exclusive". I have no idea what you are talking about. Warren and Sanders are beating up all the others? Cory Booker has no presence on the stage? Kamala Harris can't get a word in anywhere? Mayor Pete is invisible? Beto can't be heard over the loud bullying of somebody?

None of what you are claiming makes sense. None of it reflects reality. And boy, none of it takes even the slightest note of either the internecine battle on the right between the Freedom Caucus and the rest of the seated GOPers OR what went down in the previous GOP primary debates - "Hey Trump. You have a tiny penis"... "Hey Little Marco, my dick is enormous"

You missed the central point. I was instead referring to the rather monotonous uniformity of the political proposals each candidate was making

the disastrous consequences of their... enactment in the Congress

implicit to that was their strange but evident uniform acceptance of the underlying proposition that none of them could actually win the election or govern.

instead a few cheap shots at each other's background does not constitute a debate.

Hey, the man's got to get his exercise.

100 million tax payer dollars for Trump golf trips fine with you?

Obama's bailout of his bankster criminal buddies

Your (sic) mistaken, George Bush bailed out the banks and financial organizations because they were "ahem" too big to fail.

By September 2008, McCain and Obama met with President George W. Bush and together they called for a $700 billion bailout of the banks, not the people. Obama and McCain issued a joint statement that called the bank bailout plan “flawed,” but said, “the effort to protect the American economy must not fail.” Obama expressed “outrage” at the “crisis,” which was “a direct result of the greed and irresponsibility that has dominated Washington and Wall Street for years.”

There is no man-made climate change.