192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2019 02:25 pm
@Olivier5,
Hilarious!! This is our world: man makes claim, woman asks man for proof to support claim, man calls woman an “obsessive truther”.

I had to laugh.
Lash
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2019 02:30 pm
Brits in my timeline are hashtagging #dissolvetheunion. Reading that conversation is sad but hopeful.

Seems the trend is to local. A return. A new beginning.

But, an end.
Lash
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2019 02:44 pm
@snood,
As I said, he can’t just prove his point by refuting content. Hillary Clinton, Obama, Kamala—all neoliberal conservative Centrists. The Republican Party had to swing psychotic right to put daylight between themselves and your heroes.

You guys are the New Republicans.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  3  
Tue 23 Jul, 2019 02:51 pm
@Lash,
Oliver sounds like he is taking a page out of AOC's play book:
Quote:
I think that there’s a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.

0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2019 04:20 pm
@Lash,
I already listed a few arguments and evidence which you failed to acknowledge.
Lash
 
  0  
Tue 23 Jul, 2019 05:18 pm
@Olivier5,
I backtracked through 2 pages through our conversation, and there’s nothing. I’m not divining through this site.

There’s no proof that the Russian dabbling made a difference.

There’s plenty of evidence that we’ve overturned governments though. If you ever find anything definitive that affected our election, feel free to share a link.
izzythepush
 
  -1  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 12:20 am
@Lash,
Hopeful of what? More platitudes? I'm sorry but your post doesn't appear to actually say anything.
Olivier5
 
  0  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 12:27 am
@Lash,
Let me repost it for ya:

Quote:
The volume of traffic generated, the adoption of Russian-pedled memes by US voters, the narrowness of the ultimate result, etc.

Let's be realistic: the Russians don't spend money and efforts for nothing.

Let's be logical: if they had no influence whatsoever, Obama would have been CORRECT in not making these Russian efforts public before election day. You CANNOT reproach him that secrecy, and contend that it was inconsequential anyway.

Unless you're a Trump supporter of course. They know no logic nor realism.
Builder
 
  3  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 03:30 am
@Lash,
Quote:
There’s no proof that the Russian dabbling made a difference.


The neverTrumpers have been convinced there's a scapegoat somewhere, and, in good US fashion, the old Reds under the Beds syndrome suits their needs just fine.

Let's not dwell on obvious things, like Hillary calling the nation a bunch of deplorables, or abusively demanding "why am I not fifty points in front" in the polls, or laughing like a psychopath over arranging the street rape and murder of the leader of another nation.

Much easier to point to a handful of trolls on facebook, with a budget of a hundred grand.

Builder
 
  3  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 03:35 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Let's be realistic: the Russians don't spend money and efforts for nothing.


For once, it would appear that the amount spent on the election didn't affect the result. Clinton's spend was well over double what Trump invested.

I guess it's just tough (for some punters) to understand that the bitch was just not presidential at all.

I wasn't at all surprised at the result, myself. She handled herself like the NPD psychopath she really is, and abused the nation's people, like they were idiots.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  0  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 03:58 am
@Builder,
There can be several causes to one single event. Open your mind.
Builder
 
  3  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 04:19 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
There can be several causes to one single event.


I listed the obvious ones. Voters do not appreciate being denigrated, or abused.

Quote:
Open your mind.


Meaning focus only on it being the Russians, right?
Lash
 
  0  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 05:09 am
@izzythepush,
I’ll try to explain my viewpoint.

Because of climate change and a resounding public repudiation of neoliberalism and its accompanying feature, loss of personal autonomy for the great majority of people on this planet, the natural result is a trend toward more local administration.

Britain is an example of this happening.





izzythepush
 
  -1  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 05:20 am
@Lash,
Britain is an example of xenophobic scum forcing the country down the shitter.

If you're reading posts about abandoning the Union, they're not talking about the EU, they're talking about Britain.

No good will come of any of it.

The EU was the best hope for cutting carbon emissions.
snood
 
  5  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 05:25 am
The governor of PR is resigning!

The people for the win!

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/article233048427.html
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  2  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 07:38 am
Michael Isikoff

Verified account

@Isikoff
5m5 minutes ago
More
Mueller is answering few questions-- citing the report, asking questions to be repeated, seems confused at times and uncertain about key parts of his own report.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  2  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 07:54 am
Michael Tracey

Verified account

@mtracey
6m6 minutes ago
More
Media portrayal of Mueller: sterling, heroic, supremely competent pursuer of truth

Actual performance of Mueller: bumbling, shaky, can't recall key facts

Now we know why he hid from the public for 2+ years
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  2  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 08:07 am
Yashar Ali 🐘

Verified account

@yashar
Follow Follow @yashar
More
3. Mueller confirms to ranking member Collins that his investigation was never curtailed.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  2  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 08:11 am
Michael Tracey

Verified account

@mtracey
1m1 minute ago
More
Mifsud is discussed extensively in the Report and his actions are cited as an impetus for launching the investigation, but sadly Mueller can't say a word about him. Oh well
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Wed 24 Jul, 2019 12:53 pm
@izzythepush,
I’ve been reading the posts, so it’s clear that some Scotland folks are agitating for a parting from the U.K.

I think we’ll all be governed more locally within a couple of decades.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.48 seconds on 03/10/2025 at 08:14:47