192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Sat 11 May, 2019 08:19 am
Quote:
Over the course of 17 hours, President Donald Trump repeated 17 false and misleading claims that we have written about since he became president.

Trump began with an evening rally in Panama City Beach, Florida, on May 8, that lasted more than an hour, and followed it up a day later with an impromptu afternoon press conference at the White House.

Here are the repeated claims that the president made, from when the rally started at about 8 p.m. on May 8 to the end of the press conference at 12:49 p.m. on May 9.

Florida Rally
Abortion: Trump said, “And then you have this governor in Virginia, you saw that? The baby is born, and you wrap the baby beautifully, and you talk to the mother about the possible execution of the baby.” That mischaracterizes Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s comments.

Northam, who is a physician, said third-trimester abortion is “done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s nonviable. … The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” A spokesperson for Northam said his comments were “focused on the tragic and extremely rare case in which a woman with a nonviable pregnancy or severe fetal abnormalities went into labor.” See “FactChecking the State of the Union.”

Preexisting Conditions: Trump said, “We will always protect patients with preexisting conditions. Always. The Republican Party will always protect patients with preexisting conditions.” Trump doesn’t mention the fact that his administration has sided with plaintiffs in a lawsuit that aims to have the Affordable Care Act declared unconstitutional.

The Department of Justice said in a June 2018 letter that it believed two provisions of the ACA would have to be eliminated if the lawsuit succeeded: those guaranteeing that people can’t be denied coverage by insurers or charged more based on certain factors, including health status. But this year, the DOJ backed full repeal of the law in the suit. Also, the ACA’s preexisting condition protections are more comprehensive than those offered in 2017 Republican health care bills. See “Trump Misleads on Preexisting Conditions” and “The Preexisting Conditions Debate Isn’t Over.”

Veteran’s Choice: Trump said, “And for the veterans we passed V.A. choice, right? … They’ve been trying to get it passed for 44 years. We got it passed.” The Veteran’s Choice Program was created in 2014 by bipartisan legislation that passed with overwhelming majorities in Congress under then-President Barack Obama. It allows veterans facing long wait times to seek care outside the V.A. system. See “Trump’s ‘Greatest Idea’ for a 2014 Law.”

V.A. Accountability: “We also passed — 46 years they’ve been trying — V.A. accountability, because under the V.A. you couldn’t fire anybody,” Trump said. “If they were terrible to our great vets, they could be sadistic, they could steal, they could rob, they could do anything. We had no way of firing these people.” It’s not true that the Department of Veterans Affairs couldn’t fire employees for cause until Trump signed the Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act in June 2017. That law aims to make it easier to remove employees, but the VA fired more than 2,000 employees each year going back to 2006 for discipline and performance reasons before Trump took office, according to data the department reported to the Office of Personnel Management.

Employment: Trump said, “More people are working today in the United States, almost 160 million, than have ever worked in the United States before.” It’s true that there’s a record 151.1 million people employed in the United States. But the employment number has rarely deviated from its upward trend for as long as such figures have been tracked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

There have been exceptions to employment growth, such as during recessions. But in the post-Great Recession period, the U.S. has been setting new records every month since May 2014. See “Trump’s Pointless Job Boast.”

Estate Tax: Trump said, “To keep your family farms and ranches and small businesses in the family — they don’t talk about this – we eliminated the unfair estate tax, or death tax.” The president is referring to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, but the new tax law did not eliminate the estate tax.

Under the old law, estate assets valued at more than $5.49 million (nearly $11 million for couples) were subject to the estate tax in the 2017 tax year, according to the IRS. The new law doubled the estate tax exemption to $11.18 million ($22.4 million for couples) in the 2018 tax year. That provision expires at the end of 2025. See “Trump’s Estate Tax Spin.”

Puerto Rico: Trump said of hurricane aid, “Puerto Rico got $91 billion. I understand they don’t like me. It’s the most money we’ve given to anybody. We’ve never given $91 billion to a state. We gave it to Puerto Rico. $91 billion.” Puerto Rico has not received $91 billion. Puerto Rico received $12.6 billion in disaster relief payments since 2017, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The federal government has allocated $42.3 billion, and has obligated about half of it via binding agreements, but just a portion of that has been distributed in Puerto Rico so far.

The $91 billion figure is an estimate that includes future costs “over the life of the disaster,” which can stretch decades, according to a senior administration official. That estimate is subject to change, and any new appropriations must be approved by Congress. See “Trump Misleads on Aid to Puerto Rico.”

Second Amendment: Trump said, “Last month, I announced that my administration is unsigning the U.N. Arms Trade treaty” because “we will never allow foreign bureaucrats to trample on that very precious Second Amendment and your rights under the Second Amendment.” That’s not what the ATT does.

The treaty — which the U.S. signed in 2013, but never ratified — acknowledges “the sovereign right” of any participating country “to regulate and control conventional arms exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system.” The treaty requires parties to establish standards for regulating the international trade of weapons such as battle tanks, warships, missiles and small arms. Also, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service said the treaty “does not affect sales or trade in weapons among private citizens within a country.” See “Trump’s Deceptive Arms Trade Treaty Argument.”

Green New Deal: Trump said, “Now, Democrats are pushing a $100 trillion takeover of the U.S. economy known as the Green New Deal.” The actual cost of the proposal is unknown. Trump is rounding up the high-end estimate from the American Action Forum, a self-described “center-right policy institute,” which said the nonbinding resolution outlining ways to address climate change could cost from $51 trillion to $93 trillion between 2020 and 2029. The estimated costs only include outlays, and don’t factor in economic benefits or other effects. But experts we consulted told us the Green New Deal is currently too vague to try to estimate its cost. It would have to be turned into legislation before the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, or anyone else, could properly score its economic effect. See “How Much Will the ‘Green New Deal’ Cost?”

Trade Deficit with Mexico: Trump said, “Mexico made $100 billion on average over the last 10 years, 100 billion.” That’s incorrect. According to Census Bureau data, the U.S. trade deficit in goods and services with Mexico was $78 billion in 2018, up from $69 billion in 2017. Over the last 10 years, it has averaged $57.7 billion – about half of what Trump claimed. The U.S. has not had a $100 billion deficit in goods and services with Mexico, according to Bureau of Economic Analysis data, going back to 1986. See “Facts on Trade” and “Trump’s Habit of Inflating Trade Deficits.

Trade Deficit with China: Trump said, “You know, we’re the piggy bank that everybody steals from, including China. We’ve been paying China $500 billion a year for many, many years.” The U.S. trade deficit with China in goods and services was a record $378.7 billion in 2018, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (table 3). Over the last 10 years, it has averaged $302.1 billion. See “Trump’s Habit of Inflating Trade Deficits.

Trade Deficit Overall: Trump also said this about the U.S. trade deficit with all countries: “We’ve been losing, for years, close to $800 billion — not million — $800 million is a lot, but we’ve been losing 800 billion dollars on trade. Eight hundred billion dollars. We’re going to stop that. And we’ve already started.” The overall goods-and-services deficit was $622.1 billion in 2018 — the highest it has been since 2008, according to BEA data. 

Tariffs: Trump said if trade talks fail with China, he will impose higher tariffs on China — but he went on to falsely claim that the U.S. has never collected tariffs on Chinese goods. “Our alternative is an excellent one. It’s an alternative I’ve spoken about for years. We’ll take in well over $100 billion a year [in tariffs]. We never took in 10 cents from China. Not 10 cents.”

The U.S. has collected billions in tariffs on Chinese imports for years. Tariffs are taxes paid by U.S. importers in the form of customs duties. Prior to Trump becoming president, the U.S. collected $122.6 billion in customs duties from 2007 to 2016, or $12.3 billion a year on average, according to the U.S. International Trade Commission DataWeb. Last year, the U.S. collected nearly $23 billion — an increase that reflects the higher tariffs imposed on China by the Trump administration. See “Trump Wrong on China Trade, Again.” 

Transparency in Special Counsel Investigation: Trump said, “There was nobody that was in the history of our country more transparent than me. I said give them every document, give them every person. … I gave them White House counsel, I gave them other lawyers – anybody you want you can talk to.” Trump neglects to mention that he declined to be interviewed by the special counsel and would only answer written questions.

The special counsel tried to interview Trump for more than a year, found his written answers to be inadequate and considered a subpoena, according to the special counsel’s report. See “Barr’s Testimony, In Context.“

Mueller’s Supposed ‘Conflicts’: Trump said that special counsel Robert Mueller had “tremendous conflicts,” including a desire to be the FBI director. “He wanted to become the FBI director. We chose Director [Christopher] Wray instead and told him, ‘I’m sorry.’” That’s not what happened. Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon told investigators that the White House invited Mueller to “offer a perspective on the institution of the FBI.” Mueller “did not come in looking for the job,” Bannon said.

Trump also said Mueller had a “business dispute” with him. But correspondence between the Mueller family and officials at Trump National Golf Club in Virginia, revealed in the Mueller report, show a routine departure from the club. See “Debunking Mueller’s ‘Conflicts.’

More ‘Conflicts’ Exaggerations: Trump also said, “One of the people [on Mueller’s team] worked on the Clinton Foundation – as just about the top person at the Clinton Foundation.” Prosecutor Jeannie Rhee served as outside counsel on behalf of the Clinton Foundation on one case. She wasn’t even a foundation employee, let alone “just about the top person” there. See “Trump’s Exaggerated ‘Conflicts of Interest’ Claims.

NATO: Trump said, “We pay for — anywhere from 70 to 100 percent of

NATO. So we protect NATO. We protect European countries.” That’s a distortion. Under its current agreement, the U.S. is expected to pay just over 22 percent of NATO’s commonly funded “principal budgets,” NATO says. Trump’s claim, however, is based on how much the U.S. spends on its own defense compared with what other alliance members spend on their own defense. The U.S. share of total defense spending by all alliance members in 2018 was an estimated 66 percent, according to inflation-adjusted figures from NATO. See “Trump Still Distorting NATO Spending.”

The post Trump: 17 Repeats in 17 Hours appeared first on FactCheck.org



Links embedded in the source below:
FC
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 10:37 am
@oralloy,
You are really a Nazi type person. Next you'll be wearing g a brown shirt. The thing your advocating are the very things Hitler did to establish his dictatorship. So you are admitting Trump is trying to establish his 4th Reich?
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Sat 11 May, 2019 11:05 am
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
The thing your advocating are the very things Hitler did to establish his dictatorship.
I think, he really wants a "Law to Remedy the Distress of People and the USA", similar to that from 1933 in Germany.
livinglava
 
  -2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 11:17 am
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

You are really a Nazi type person. Next you'll be wearing g a brown shirt. The thing your advocating are the very things Hitler did to establish his dictatorship. So you are admitting Trump is trying to establish his 4th Reich?

The Democrats are the party of unionism/socialism/collectivism. Fascism is when individuals submit their independence to playing a role in a larger collective. They do it to gain strength against the perception of a common enemy.

Fascism/socialism is thus achieved by telling people they need to bond together and cooperate against the oppressive forces of free markets, corporate management, etc. They may be right or they may be wrong, but the result is fascism/socialism/collectivism either way.

It's strange to accuse the GOP/Trump of wanting a 1930s nazi-type fascist/socialist society when they are the ones breaking down various forms of global social-economic bondage through trade. The question still remains whether they will also continue to pursue greater independence from trade at the level of domestic commerce, or whether they will continue to allow (corporate) business to work with governments to maintain regulations that block competition and more independent self-sufficient economic activities.
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 01:19 pm
@livinglava,
Quote:
The Democrats are the party of unionism/socialism/collectivism. Fascism is when individuals submit their independence to playing a role in a larger collective. They do it to gain strength against the perception of a common enemy.
We'd love to see you name and cite one single economist, historian, or political scientist who duplicates that definition. Just one. Not such a difficult task, one would imagine given your certainty. It might help to convince some here that you aren't a raving kook. Or just copy/paste an image of your membership in the John Birch Society just to clear everything up.
Quote:
Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of radical, right-wing, authoritarian ultranationalism,[1][2][3][4] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy,[5] which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.[6] The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I before it spread to other European countries.[6] Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[6][7][8][9][10][11]
wikipedia. Please note the citations included and detailed at source.

oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 03:14 pm
@blatham,
Only leftists place fascism on the far right.

Fascism actually incorporates many leftist ideals into its ideology.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 03:15 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
You are really a Nazi type person.

No. The Nazi types are the ones who falsely accuse Israel of imaginary atrocities.

Would you like to borrow a mirror?
oralloy
 
  -4  
Sat 11 May, 2019 03:16 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
I think, he really wants a "Law to Remedy the Distress of People and the USA", similar to that from 1933 in Germany.

I am not aware of the details of the law that you refer to, so I can't really comment.

The goal, however, is to just eliminate the Democratic Party from existence. This will put an end to their witch hunts.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 03:18 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
No. The Nazi types

He calls me a commie. I think his projector has a little glitch.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Sat 11 May, 2019 05:44 pm
@revelette1,
Quote:
Over the course of 17 hours, President Donald Trump repeated 17 false and misleading claims that we have written about since he became president.

Let us know before that starts a nuclear war. His lies have not hurt the economy or the unemployment figures, and it is not stopping wall get repaired and built. Desperation must be like death, hard to accept. The MSM and many here are quite desperate.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Sat 11 May, 2019 05:59 pm
Quote:
Bottom line: The agents and officials who conducted this seditious attack on the presidency never thought they’d be held accountable for their crimes. But they were wrong, and now their day of reckoning is fast approaching. The main players in this palace coup are about to be exposed, criminally charged and prosecuted. Some of them will probably wind up in jail.

“The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.”

A little refresher course. Trump was never supposed to win. These crimes would never have seen daylight and the strangle hold Obama had on our DEMOCRACY ( everyone's favorite word) and what he was going to destroy our two party system with, something America will only see when we have given up our rights, would only get worse

Trump saved this country.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-10/whitney-judgment-day-looms-john-brennan
.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  -2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 11:42 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:
Nice bait and switch.

When the Attorney General defies subpoenas, that's breaking the law.

What law is it breaking? I seem to remember learning in school that the executive and legislative branches of government were equal with no power over each other.
roger
 
  3  
Sun 12 May, 2019 12:12 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:

What law is it breaking? I seem to remember learning in school that the executive and legislative branches of government were equal with no power over each other.


We are definitely living in interesting times.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Sun 12 May, 2019 04:40 am
Quote:
More than 40 US states have filed a lawsuit accusing pharmaceutical firms of conspiring to artificially inflate the cost of common medicinal drugs.

The lawsuit alleges that as many as 20 companies have been involved in fixing prices for over 100 drugs, including treatments for diabetes and cancer.

One of the firms accused is Teva Pharmaceuticals, the world's largest producer of generic medicine.

Teva, which has denied any wrongdoing, says it will defend its actions.

The legal action, which follows a five-year investigation, accuses drugs companies of involvement in a scheme to boost prices - in some cases by more than 1,000% - and was filed on Friday by Connecticut Attorney General William Tong.

"We have hard evidence that shows the generic drug industry perpetrated a multi-billion dollar fraud on the American people," Mr Tong said.

"We have emails, text messages, telephone records and former company insiders that we believe will prove a multi-year conspiracy to fix prices and divide market share for huge numbers of generic drugs."

A representative of Teva in the US said that the Israeli company "has not engaged in any conduct that would lead to civil or criminal liability", Reuters news agency reports.

The other 19 firms implicated in the lawsuit have yet to comment on the allegations.

Fifteen individuals were also named as defendants accused of overseeing the price-fixing scheme on a day-to-day basis.

According to the lawsuit, the drugs companies allegedly conspired to manipulate prices on dozens of medicines between July 2013 and January 2015.

It accuses Teva and others of "embarking on one of the most egregious and damaging price-fixing conspiracies in the history of the United States".

Mr Tong said the investigation had exposed why the cost of healthcare and prescription drugs was so high in the US.

America's healthcare system has been at the forefront of US politics for years.

President Donald Trump has frequently promised to dismantle the Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as Obamacare, which was designed to make medical cover affordable for the many Americans who had been priced out of the market.

States have argued that eliminating Obamacare would harm millions of Americans who would struggle to meet the costs of medical care.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48241663
Lash
 
  1  
Sun 12 May, 2019 05:03 am
@izzythepush,
Thank god someone is doing something to save people. Thanks for this article. I’m not terribly hopeful because everyone has their price...
izzythepush
 
  3  
Sun 12 May, 2019 05:10 am
@Lash,
There's been a lot of negative publicity over here about NICE, (the body that approves drugs for the NHS,) not funding certain new drugs because they've not prove cost effective enough.

Nothing is perfect, but it's better than the alternative, NICE drives down the cost of drugs for the NHS because it's the only big buyer in the UK. Prescriptions, (for those who pay them,) have just done up to £9 per item, (US$11.70).

Children, pensioners and those on low incomes get free prescriptions.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Sun 12 May, 2019 05:17 am
@oralloy,
There is a new fascism happening on the ground that is coming from the left. You’re right about that. Reality is changing the damn definition that Centrists hide behind.

People are affected by both sides of the political spectrum, which are grabbing at and practicing oppressive forms of control. Hence, the electoral revolutions from *both* sides of the political spectrum. Only idiots who don’t understand what’s happening to them or people who do, but are inoculated by enough money to avoid the worst symptoms of what’s happening in the US are still voting like this isn’t a desperate situation. The complacent voters (Centrists) haven’t realized yet that their middle class inoculation from Rights encroachment and worse horrors is only temporary.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Sun 12 May, 2019 05:53 am
Quote:
A California school fundraiser has been cancelled after conspiracy theorists spread the claim it was the target of a terror attack by an ex-FBI chief.

An innocuous tweet by James Comey about his previous jobs was interpreted online as code for a "false flag" assault on the family gathering.

The Grass Valley Charter School in California said it decided to stop the event out of an "abundance of caution".

Authorities expressed concern that internet vigilantes might attend.

The bizarre claims were perpetuated by followers of the so-called QAnon conspiracy theory.

Conspiracy theorists pored over the posting, noticing that the first letter of each job he listed spelled out "GVCSF".

Internet searches revealed this to be an acronym for the Grass Valley Charter School Foundation.

QAnon adherents also rearranged the letters in the hashtag used by Mr Comey - "#FiveJobsIveHad" - to spell "five jihads".

They concluded the tweet and its timing was part of a plot hatched by the former FBI director to stage a terrorist attack on the school in Grass Valley, California.

It was noted that the school was due to hold a festival fundraiser on 11 May.
They believe that US President Donald Trump and justice department special counsel Robert Mueller have secretly joined forces to foil a "deep state" coup of the US government, plotted by paedophiliac politicians and Hollywood figures.

Mr Comey's tweet on 27 April shared his employment history as a part of the #FiveJobsIveHad Twitter trend.

The Grass Valley school has been in contact with law enforcement over the situation all week, according to a statement from the school's foundation.

The school, local police and FBI offices all received calls from believers of the conspiracy theory warning them of the imagined plot.

While the sheriff's office "deemed this entire situation as unfounded" and said there was "zero threat", the school still decided to cancel the Blue Marble Jubilee family festival.

Grass Valley Police Sgt Brian Blakemore told the San Francisco Chronicle that the callers seemed reasonable, but that it was feared they might "show up to guard the place".

Wendy Willoughby, president of the school foundation, said they were "devastated" by the impact of the wild claims.

"Not only is it disappointing that the cancellation of this event deprives the families of our school and community a day of fun and connection, but the Blue Marble Jubilee also serves as a fundraiser.

"We now find ourselves not only out the potential dollars raised at the event, but also the money already spent in preparation."

It is not the first time outlandish ideas spread online have resulted in frightening real-world consequences.

In 2016, internet trolls shared the debunked claim that a child sex trafficking ring linked to senior figures in the Democratic party was operating from the basement of a pizzeria in Washington DC.

It resulted in a North Carolina man deciding to "self-investigate" by showing up at the restaurant with a rifle and shooting the lock off a closet.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48231708
FreedomEyeLove
 
  -1  
Sun 12 May, 2019 05:58 am
@izzythepush,
https://i.postimg.cc/nc643Ks1/npc2.jpg
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Sun 12 May, 2019 06:49 am
@Lash,
Quote:
There is a new fascism happening on the ground that is coming from the left.

Does this "new fascism" embrace hyper-nationalism and militarism? If not,
your political analysis would be better served by not trying to tie the new phenomenon to "fascism", which has a pretty distinct historical definition. Come up with a new descriptive term and I think your point would gain more traction. People on the left have pointed fingers and yelled "fascist!" for so long that the accusation has become a cliche.

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 11:00:17