192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 10 May, 2019 08:32 am
@blatham,
Quote:
Can these people get any worse?

That is really not a question a PROVEN liar and a person that wishes people dead(many times) should be asking. Is it?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 10 May, 2019 08:42 am
Quote:
Interview With A Whore


https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-t2SzOHBrXBw/XNVgr3PSr_I/AAAAAAAAfws/40WQmnnP7CUVlbbfluOewoqSTcPGVFtkQCLcBGAs/s1600/Interview%2BWith%2BA%2BWhore.png

Laughing Laughing Laughing
Quote:
It's clear that Comey is speaking out to cover his skanky ass and set up a narrative before reports from Inspector General Michael Horowitz come and before Attorney General William Barr reveals the results of his investigation into the origin of the Russia collusion sham.

https://politicalclownparade.blogspot.com/2019/05/interview-with-whore.html?spref=tw
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Fri 10 May, 2019 09:00 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Surely It's a Coincidence That a Firm Tied to a Russian Oligarch Is Pouring Millions Into Kentucky


Figured Bevin would be tied up in it. He got in because Kentuckians were too lazy to come out to vote that year during an off presidential election. We'll probably just vote him in again being to lazy to see how he has governed. He is lock and step with Trump/McConnell and all the rest of those. Ironically, the same people who vote them in are the same people who complain about their health insurance or their retirement savings from coal companies.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Fri 10 May, 2019 02:10 pm
Laura Jarrett

Verified account

@LauraAJarrett
2h2 hours ago
More
For those keeping track at home, here's who has seen the Mueller report with fewer redactions (than the public version): Senators McConnell, Burr, and Graham, along with House Republicans McCarthy and Collins. No Democrat has come to read it. Neither has Rep. Nunes.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 12:15 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Rudy Giuliani Cancels His Trip to Ukraine, Blaming Democrats’ ‘Spin’
Quote:
May 11, 2019

WASHINGTON — Facing withering attacks accusing him of seeking foreign assistance for President Trump’s re-election campaign, Rudolph W. Giuliani announced on Friday night that he had canceled a trip to Kiev in which he planned to push the incoming Ukrainian government to press ahead with investigations that he hoped would benefit Mr. Trump.

Mr. Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, explained that he felt like he was being “set up,” and he blamed Democrats for trying to “spin” the trip.

“They say I was meddling in the election — ridiculous — but that’s their spin,” he said.

Mr. Giuliani said on Thursday that he had hoped to meet in Kiev, the Ukrainian capital, with the nation’s president-elect and urge him to pursue inquiries that could yield new information about two matters of intense interest to Mr. Trump. One is the origin of the special counsel’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. The other is the involvement of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s son in a gas company owned by a Ukrainian oligarch.

The trip raised the specter of a lawyer for Mr. Trump pressing a foreign government to pursue investigations that his allies hope could help him win re-election. And it comes after Mr. Trump has spent more than half of his term facing scrutiny about whether his 2016 campaign conspired with Ukraine’s hostile neighbor, Russia. Mr. Giuliani had planned to leave on Sunday.

After The New York Times published a report about the trip on Thursday, Democrats assailed Mr. Giuliani, accusing him of activity evoking that at the center of the recently concluded special counsel’s investigation.

“Today, Giuliani admitted to seeking political help from a foreign power. Again,” tweeted Representative Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He called the plan “immoral, unethical, unpatriotic and, now, standard procedure.”

Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York and the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, told reporters, “We have come to a very sorry state when it is considered O.K. for an American politician, never mind an attorney for the president, to go and seek foreign intervention in American politics.”

On Friday night, Mr. Giuliani rejected that characterization, asserting in a brief interview, “My only purpose was to make sure the investigation continued.”

The change of plans came as advisers were urging the incoming Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, a comedian and political newcomer, not to meet with Mr. Giuliani, according to a person familiar with the conversations.


0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sat 11 May, 2019 12:35 am
Mike Pence is almost as stupid as slobber boy. Watch the look on his face when he pauses for applause after mentioning Trump's name and gets a stony silence. It's almost as good as the look on Trump's daughter wife's face when she hears Merkel getting a lot of applause.



Trump, making America a Pariah state.
hightor
 
  3  
Sat 11 May, 2019 02:30 am
UN: Plastic waste pact approved with US among few holdouts
Builder
 
  -1  
Sat 11 May, 2019 03:40 am
@hightor,
It's not actually what's happening with plastic waste within the US of A that is problematic, Hi. It's sending consumer products to developing nations that don't have a waste handling facility in place to manage the plastic.

Giving your consumer/capitalist scenario to developing nations is the problem.
hightor
 
  3  
Sat 11 May, 2019 05:08 am
@Builder,
You overestimate the state of waste-handling in the USA. Our plastic recycling was only semi-functional before China stopped taking mixed plastic waste. The USA doesn't recycle consumer products because of concern for public health or the natural environment. We only make an effort if there's a profit to be made. Meanwhile, a confusing array of plastic packaging (some of which can't be easily reprocessed) continues to grow. There's hostility to re-cycling by many consumers, the Republican Party doesn't give a ****, the domestic markets for post-consumer waste have dried up, and waste-to-energy plants face opposition from communities.
Quote:
Giving your consumer/capitalist scenario to developing nations is the problem.

No argument there. But it's ironic that developing nations may ultimately demonstrate more responsibility in their approach and actually do something to address the problem.
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 06:19 am
@izzythepush,
My favorite rejoinder from conservatives/Republicans when it becomes clear that the international community criticizes or stands again some GOP president is that this constitutes evidence that GOP prez is doing it right.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 06:35 am
@hightor,
I suppose it doesn't need to be said but this is one more piece of evidence that much US policy is being determined by the fossil fuel industries.
Lash
 
  0  
Sat 11 May, 2019 06:52 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

I suppose it doesn't need to be said but this is one more piece of evidence that much US policy is being determined by the fossil fuel industries.

...and the pharmaceutical industry, the military industrial complex, and insurance companies.

Maybe this goes a little way in showing you centrist guys why Bernie voters demand financial ‘purity’ of presidential candidates. We want to stop this gravy train and power structure.
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 07:11 am
@Lash,
Original thoughts. Thanks.
Lash
 
  -2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 07:15 am
@blatham,
Based on the political musings of you and your buddies here, you definitely need a little help connecting the problem to the only available solution.

You’re welcome.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sat 11 May, 2019 07:37 am
Not that Fox is a GOP propaganda operation, or anything.
Quote:
In 2019, 92% of Trump's nationally televised interviews have been on Fox News or Fox Business
http://bit.ly/2Ypa0VZ
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sat 11 May, 2019 07:42 am
Voter suppression news from all over
Quote:
Rights groups are challenging a Tennessee law threatening harsh civil and criminal penalties if they fail to abide by restrictive new requirements while registering voters in the state.

Activists say the measure, signed by Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee (R) last week, could harm their ability to register underrepresented populations.

State Republicans pressed for the legislation after the group The Tennessee Black Voter Project registered thousands of new voters in Memphis, Tennessee, last year. The bill was among a number of GOP-backed mandates that critics say aimed to suppress voter turnout under the guise of protecting election integrity.
http://bit.ly/2YreAmX
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sat 11 May, 2019 07:53 am
Ed Kilgore on the changing notions regarding impeachment
Quote:
Until recently, the debate among Democrats over impeachment was mostly a straightforward argument about the 2020 fallout over taking this drastic step to deal with a drastically dangerous president. Few impeachment supporters were under the illusion that the process would actually lead to the removal of Trump from office by the requisite two-thirds vote in a Republican-controlled Senate. But some thought impeachment might dramatize Trump’s misconduct and energize Democratic voters. Others, notably Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler, disagreed, fearing that a doomed impeachment effort would take Democrats far off message in 2020 while psyching Trump supporters out of their skulls.

The release of the redacted Mueller report, with its abundant evidence of presidential obstruction of justice, didn’t change many minds among Democratic impeachment opponents, who may have concluded (as presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg put it) that Trump deserved impeachment, but still deemed it a politically dubious course of action this close to an election year.

But Mueller’s clear indication that impeachment would be the only way to hold Trump accountable for his conduct provided another strong talking point for moving in that direction: that politics be damned, it was House Democrats’ constitutional responsibility to rein in this lawless president. This was the position, for example, of another 2020 presidential candidate, Elizabeth Warren.

And now, as the Trump administration clearly signals its determination to stonewall the House by refusing to cooperate with investigations, release documents, or allow official testimony, there’s a new argument for impeachment making the rounds: It’s the only way to prevail in the inevitable legal fights between Trump and Congress over evidence of presidential misconduct, as Darren Samuelsohn and Josh Gerstein noted at Politico:

Quote:
Judges have repeatedly ruled that Congress has a greater claim to sensitive government documents and personal information when it can point to an ongoing legal matter, instead of just a congressional investigation or legislative debate. And impeachment would give lawmakers that legal matter — the process is essentially a court procedure run by Congress where the House brings charges and the Senate holds the trial …

[L]egal experts and lawmakers across the ideological spectrum acknowledge that formally unleashing impeachment would bolster Democrats’ arguments that they deserve to see the president’s tax returns, interview senior officials, peruse special counsel Robert Mueller’s trove of evidence and see the details of Trump’s personal dealings with foreign leaders.


Indeed, impeachment might not only “trump” executive privilege in a court review of congressional subpoenas, but could also gives courts a solid reason to speed up hearings and appeals on the subject, much as the U.S. Supreme Court did in United States v. Nixon, the unanimous decision forcing that president to release tapes which included the famous “smoking gun” evidence of obstruction of justice. In that case, SCOTUS ruled just three weeks after oral argument subsequent to an expedited appeal from a district court.

The question of timing is becoming central to Democrats’ dilemma. If their efforts to investigate Trump get perpetually snarled in the courts, the whole conflict could drag beyond the 2020 elections. And the political risks of impeachment may grow higher by the day as well. Many Democrats think Hillary Clinton erred grievously in 2016 by campaigning against Trump’s character and ethics rather than promoting her own agenda for addressing the concerns the GOP demagogue was exploiting. Nothing would quite keep campaign 2020 more focused on Trump’s character and ethics than ongoing impeachment proceedings.

Public opinion offers no clear prescription. Around the time the Mueller report was released, pro-impeachment sentiment among Americans generally and Democrats specifically had been waning for a good while. Now there’s at least one new poll showing support for impeachment rising again among both Democrats and independents.

If, as Pelosi publicly suggests, Trump is “goading” Democrats into impeaching him, he may ultimately get his way as the House finds itself boxed out of any other approach. Already attitudes are hardening among House Democrats, as Jonathan Allen reports:

Quote:
“There’s a deep concern, particularly among institutionalists, about the balance of power,” said a senior aide to one moderate Democrat who noted that the administration’s refusal to comply with subpoenas has angered some lawmakers who had been reluctant to escalate the fight.

That is, the pace is speeding up even for most Democrats who have been reluctant to go down a path that could lead to impeachment.


Should they become convinced that impeachment will give them the hammer to bust open Trump’s lockbox of potentially fatal secrets, pressure for impeachment could finally overcome 2020 fears. Democrats may conclude that beating Trump in the court of public opinion requires a step down a very uncertain path.
https://nym.ag/2YjGdOH
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 08:02 am
Quote:
"Our constitutional system never contemplated a President like Donald Trump," Jeffrey Toobin advises in his latest column for The New Yorker. The Framers anticipated some friction between the three branches of government, but not a mutant like Donald Trump who, abetted by cult-like followers, single-handedly initiates a total blockade of the legislative branch.

Though there may be a raft of them, these are not singular fights, Toobin insists, but "an open campaign of total defiance against another branch of government." The legal system was not designed to address this kind of a coordinated wave attack. "The law has no clear mechanism for adjudicating these claims together—but they belong together," Toobin explains.

To hell with the unitary executive theory. In the name of America, the sitting president and his followers now upset its very meaning in ways as potentially impactful as the Civil War. Grover Norquist famously wanted to roll back the 20th century and restore the McKinley administration. Trump is bent on restoring monarchical rule that ended on these shores with the Treaty of Paris. His red-hatted faux-patriots are just fine with that...
http://bit.ly/2YrN1Kd
There's a reason Trump is so comfortable with the world's authoritarian leaders and far less so with democratic leaders. He is exactly that type. He, like Putin, Kim Jong-un, Duterte, Bin Salman, etc is a sociopath.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Sat 11 May, 2019 08:04 am
@blatham,
Good, I hope more, a lot more, change their minds. Including Polesi.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Sat 11 May, 2019 08:09 am
@revelette1,
Outlawing the Democratic Party will end your shameful and hypocritical witch hunts.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 05/15/2024 at 06:16:49