192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Wed 8 May, 2019 07:56 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
"Everybody in NY hates this guy"

You know what else they say in NY? "Who f*cking cares."

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Thu 9 May, 2019 12:52 am
Quote:
A US teenager who took legal action against his school after he was banned for refusing the chickenpox vaccination now has the virus, his lawyer says.

Jerome Kunkel, 18, made headlines last month after he unsuccessfully sued his Kentucky school for barring unimmunised students amid an outbreak.

His lawyer, Christopher Weist, told US media that the teen's symptoms developed last week.

The student had opposed the vaccine on religious grounds.

His lawsuit argued the vaccine is "immoral, illegal and sinful" and that his rights had been violated.

The ban from his school, Our Lady of the Sacred Heart/Assumption Academy in Walton, came during an outbreak that sickened at least 32 pupils.

Mr Weist told NBC News his young client did not regret his decision to remain unvaccinated.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48205523
izzythepush
 
  0  
Thu 9 May, 2019 01:03 am
Quote:
US President Donald Trump said China "broke the deal" in trade talks, ramping up hostilities ahead of negotiations between the two sides.

The comments come as Beijing said it would retaliate with "necessary countermeasures" if the US raises tariffs on Chinese products.

Mr Trump has vowed to more than double tariffs on $200bn (£152bn) of Chinese goods on Friday.

Despite that, the two sides are due to hold trade talks in the US on Thursday.

Ahead of the discussions, Mr Trump accused China's leaders of breaking the deal the US was negotiating on trade.

"They broke the deal... They can't do that. So they'll be paying," Mr Trump told supporters at a campaign rally in Florida.

He said if the two sides don't make a deal, there was "nothing wrong with taking in more than $100bn a year".

Only recently, the two sides seemed to be nearing an agreement that would put an end to the trade war.

But on Sunday Mr Trump said on Twitter the US would hike tariffs on $200bn worth of Chinese goods this week and could introduce fresh tariffs.

US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer later accused China of backtracking on commitments in trade talks. However, he insisted a deal with Beijing was still possible.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-48205298
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Thu 9 May, 2019 01:04 am
@blatham,
Quote:
I like you but this is ridiculous.

It was a joke. I totally get your take.
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 9 May, 2019 02:32 am
@izzythepush,
That's one of those har de har har things.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 02:33 am
@Olivier5,
Damn. Sorry man. I'm a tad dull sometimes.
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 9 May, 2019 03:03 am
From NYT editorial board
Quote:
What Is Donald Trump Hiding?
The latest revelations about President Trump’s past tax reports underscore the importance of examining his more recent returns.

President Trump owes the American people a fuller account of his financial dealings, including the release of his recent tax returns, because politicians should keep their promises, because the public deserves to know whether his policies are lining his pockets and because the integrity of our system of government requires everyone, particularly the president, to obey the law.

Mr. Trump promised to release his tax returns before his presidential campaign and in the early stages of that campaign, then reneged, offering a long series of inconsistent excuses for breaking his promise. Now Mr. Trump is resisting the lawful request of the House Ways and Means Committee for the Treasury secretary to release the last six years of his tax returns.

In seeking the president’s returns, the House is clearly acting in the public interest...
more here

0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  4  
Thu 9 May, 2019 04:03 am
@blatham,
Most of the times I'm just joking these days.
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 9 May, 2019 05:07 am
@Olivier5,
A fine strategy, it seems to me. I'm considering it as an option for these times. 50/50 that or heroin.
Brand X
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 06:46 am
Jonathan Turley


@JonathanTurley
16h16 hours ago
More
Democrats are launching the weakest possible contempt claim against the administration in a civil action that presents the longest possible track through the courts. In the end, there is utter contempt in this action, but not in the case of Barr.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 08:34 am
@blatham,
Heroin is too expensive. On the upside you get to send money to needy Afghan farmers.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 09:04 am
More dazzling foreign policy success from the slobbery nonce.

Quote:
North Korea has fired two short-range missiles in its second weapons test in less than a week, the South Korean military says.

The missiles fired from the north-western city of Kusong travelled 420km (260 miles) and 270km towards the east.

It came hours after the top US envoy arrived in South Korea for talks on how to revive nuclear negotiations.

Analysts say the North is trying to increase pressure on the US over its failure to make concessions.

A meeting in Vietnam between North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and US President Donald Trump ended without agreement in February with the US insisting North Korea give up its nuclear programme and Pyongyang demanding sanctions relief.

What do we know about the latest firing?
The two missiles were fired at about 16:30 local time (07:30 GMT) and reached an altitude of about 50km before falling into the sea, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a statement.

They were launched from Kusong, some 160km from the capital, Pyongyang. Detailed analysis was being carried out in co-operation with US intelligence officials, it added.

On Saturday, the North fired several short-range missiles, the first missile test since it launched an intercontinental ballistic missile in November 2017.

The tests should not come as a surprise as North Korean state media has repeatedly shown its frustration with recent joint US-South Korea military exercises, BBC Seoul correspondent Laura Bicker reports.

Pyongyang has also warned Washington that its patience to do a deal involving the easing of sanctions will not last long before it takes what Mr Kim has described as a "new path", our correspondent adds.

South Korea's presidency said the launches were "very worrisome" and unhelpful for efforts to reduce tensions.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-48212045
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 09:34 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Heroin is too expensive. On the upside you get to send money to needy Afghan farmers.
So in a way, you could describe it as one of those win/win things. Like the time my wife was suggesting that Leroy, who used to play for the Boston Celtics, join us for date-night.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 09:40 am
@izzythepush,
Yeah. Steve Benen has a good piece up on Trump/NK/Iran
Quote:
After stating his goals for Iran, Trump's policy makes even less sense

Despite making a series of unnecessary concessions, Donald Trump's policy toward North Korea appears to be unraveling. The rogue nuclear state launched two rounds of missiles overnight -- despite Trump's boast that he brought an end to North Korea's weapons testing -- and yesterday, the Pentagon said it's suspended talks with Pyongyang about recovering the remains of U.S. service members killed during the Korean war.

And yet, the last we heard from the White House, the American president reiterated that the North Korean dictator knows that Trump is "with him."

But as strange as it is to see the Republican embrace a nuclear-armed dictator who keeps firing missiles into the sea, Trump's policy toward North Korea is clear and coherent compared to his posture toward Iran. Here was the American president last night at a rally in northern Florida:

"I hope to be able at some point -- maybe it won't happen, possibly won't -- to sit down and work out a fair deal [with Iran]. We're not looking to hurt anybody.

"We want a fair deal. We just don't want them to have nuclear weapons. It's all we want."

That might be more persuasive if it weren't for the fact that Trump already had what he said he wants. There was an international nuclear agreement in place with Iran, which according to the president's own team, was working exactly as intended -- right up until Trump abandoned the policy one year ago this week for reasons that he's never fully explained.

If "all" the administration wants is for Iran not to have nuclear weapons, all Trump had to do was allow the policy to keep working effectively. He did the opposite, which has led Iran to start backing away from its commitments under the deal.

The result is a dynamic in which the Republican is embracing a rogue nuclear state firing missiles, while thumbing his nose at a country that was complying with an international agreement the United States negotiated.
more here

The fellow has one of the best minds in the history of the world. Great mind. You wouldn't believe it. Incredible brain.
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 09:47 am
Men of principle. No better way to define modern Republican politicians.
Quote:
Rubio's old principle: an AG held in contempt 'should resign'

The House Judiciary Committee voted yesterday to hold Attorney General Bill Barr in contempt, and soon, the whole Democratic-led House will likely approve the same measure.

According to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), that's a strong indication that the attorney general should resign -- at least according to the standards the Florida Republican laid out seven years ago.

Quote:
Video unearthed Wednesday by an activist group shows U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio making the case for Attorney General Eric Holder to resign after he was found in contempt of Congress in 2012.

"No one can be above the law, not even the Attorney General," Rubio says in the clip. He added: "I think an attorney general held in contempt of Congress is someone who should resign." [...]

The clip was released by Republicans for the Rule of Law, a group created by "life-long Republicans dedicated to defending the institutions of our republic," according to the organization's website.


At one point in the video, Rubio emphasizes the institutional significance of congressional oversight of the executive branch, concluding that it's "outrageous that any attorney general, Republican or Democrat, refused to comply with Congress' constitutional right to hold them accountable and the Justice Department accountable."

The senator quickly added, "I would say that if this was a Republican."

Is that so.

Rubio went on to complain about the administration's use of executive privilege, which led him to believe "there's something in those documents that they don't want us to know about. There's something in there they don't want the public to be aware of. And I think that's wrong."
more here
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 11:36 am
Leaker, Daniel Hale, may get as much as a 50 year total sentence.

'The leaked documents appear to be related to President Barack Obama's targeted killing program that involved the use of drones.'

Trevor Timm

Verified account

@trevortimm
3h3 hours ago
More Trevor Timm Retweeted Ken Klippenstein
It really is amazing. The Trump admin is on pace to shatter the Obama admin record for prosecuting journalists’ sources. This is terrible for journalism.

Ken Klippenstein

Verified account

@kenklippenstein
Follow Follow @kenklippenstein
More Ken Klippenstein Retweeted Rachel Weiner
Amazing how little people seem to care about the shocking number of media leak indictments under the Trump admin

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/doj-charges-former-intelligence-analyst-with-leaking-classified-info.html?__source=facebook%7Cmain&fbclid=IwAR2lFP83-m8olHd5QJX_YufSYmHilW7zbEDUU2sZjiYnue5Dgj3gvKWkAC4

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Thu 9 May, 2019 11:48 am
@blatham,
His policy towards Iran appeals to the bigotry of his base and his buddy Netanyahu, that towards North Korea is all down to hubris.

This seems a suitable place to talk about Trump's folly towards Iran and the ME in general.

His base has never got over the hostage crisis of the 80s. The death of the Ayatollah and a new generation of politicians hasn't changed that.

It's all one sided too, they go on about what Iran has done to America, conveniently ignoring the CIA coup that deposed a Democratic government putting the autocratic Shah in power and Iranian passenger airlines shot down by American forces.

These people just see Iran as the focus for their Islamophobia, they don't want to know the truth, it gets in the way of bigotry.

Trump originally attacked Iran for the role it was playing in the ME in general, in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.

That's true enough, but they're not the only regional power doing this. Saudi Arabia is doing exactly the same thing.

Any conflict in the ME has to be viewed through the sectarian divide of Shia and Sunni. Sunni are the majority throughout the ME, but there are Shia dominated countries and in those with a majority Sunni there is a significant Shia minority.

Basically Saudi Arabia supports the Sunnis by supporting the legitimate government in Yemen and the insurgents in Syria. In each conflict Shia Iran backs the other side.

Saudi Arabia and Iran accuse each other of backing terrorists and attempting illegal regime change(s).

It's a sectarian thing and it's been going on a long time. Iraq is Shia dominated, and will always support Shia Iran over Sunni Saudi Arabia regardless of how many visits Pompeo makes.

A place I would be worried about is Bahrain, majority Shia ruled by a tiny Sunni elite and home of the 5th Fleet. Lots of pro Iranian feeling among the natives there.

There are Sunni and Shia terrorist organisations but there is one huge difference. Shia groups like Hezbollah largely confine their actions to the ME, they don't export it.

It's Saudi financed Sunni terrorist groups like Al Qaida and Daish who are behind 9/11 and all the other terrorist attacks in the West.

The only reason we're backing the Saudis over Iran is because of oil contacts with families like the Bushes and Bin Ladins going back for years.

We're backing the wrong ******* side.
revelette1
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 11:58 am
@izzythepush,
I can't think of anything more ridiculous than not getting immunization shots, even on religious grounds. I mean, going back through the times man used herbs and plants for illness and wounds. If God didn't want us to take advantage of it, why would they be there to take advantage of? I realize that can said about a lot of things, not all of it good. Nevertheless, I don't blame that school for banning him for not taking shots. If you endanger your own life, that's fine, but you don't get to endanger anyone else by contagious diseases which are preventable. I guess all those who refuse to give their kids their shots, should move to an Island somewhere where they can't infect anyone else.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Thu 9 May, 2019 11:59 am
@izzythepush,
Agree
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  1  
Thu 9 May, 2019 12:09 pm
Big day all around yesterday with the deserved vote of contempt and the subpoena of Trump's son.

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.46 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 01:26:55