192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Forums: Politics, Trump, American Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
maporsche
 
  3  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 07:38 pm
@oralloy,
As long as you agree that it’s a misuse of the term then I’m fine.

We should correct these misstatements whenever we can.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 08:01 pm
@maporsche,
I've been correcting them for years. No one seems to care.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 09:43 pm
Paul Manafort shared 2016 polling data with Russian associate, according to court filing
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 10:09 pm
@revelette1,
Now you just have to prove Trump knew about it, and a poll result is usually made public. More nothing.
maporsche
 
  3  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 10:35 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Now you just have to prove Trump knew about it, and a poll result is usually made public. More nothing.


Why does anyone have to prove that?

They date of the Mueller investigation IS NOT to catch Trump. It’s to find out IF anyone on his campaign helped the Russians interfere.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 10:42 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:


Why does anyone have to prove that?

To impeach Trump. And do not tell me the investigation is for anything else, besides destroying evidence and covering their tracks.
maporsche
 
  3  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 10:48 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:


Why does anyone have to prove that?

To impeach Trump. And do not tell me the investigation is for anything else, besides destroying evidence and covering their tracks.


For the 50th time. I don't want Trump impeached. Neither do most Democrats.

And the letter to Mueller could not be any more clear. And NO WHERE does it say "don't stop until you catch Trump."

And Trump has an INSIDE guy there now. If Muelle was outside of this mandate, don't you think he'd have told Trump and Trump would have squashed this by now?

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/18/19/4076B93400000578-4519234-image-a-3_1495131176000.jpg
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 10:52 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:

For the 50th time. I don't want Trump impeached. Neither do most Democrats.

How does that change what the investigation is about? Because we do not hear from those Democrats. The purpose of the Special Council is to get Trump.
maporsche
 
  2  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 10:59 pm
@coldjoint,
Oh Yawn!!!
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Tue 8 Jan, 2019 11:53 pm
Left Coast approach to health care...

https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3955327/pg1
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 12:16 am
@coldjoint,
Not true. The purpose of the investigation was to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 investigation. The fact that the investigation so far has shown that there was in fact Russian meddling and that Trump and his team were best friends forever with the meddlers is entirely trump et al's fault, not Mueller's/
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 12:30 am
@MontereyJack,
The only nation in the world which was doing any serious/meaningful "meddling" in the 2016 election was Great Britain.

Again...

http://www.bearfabrique.org/bimages_files/image008.jpg
gungasnake
 
  0  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 12:32 am
I mean, my little blond honey in spetsnaz tells me the Russian government had zero interest in the US election, figuring the demopoops had no shot whatever at winning it.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 12:42 am
@gungasnake,
stupidity.And actually if you really knew anything which you clearly don't, you would know rhat stone tools were actually pretty sophisticated. A pressure flaked obsidian knife blade, for example is just about the swhqrpest thing you can make, since it comes pretty close to having a monomolecular edge, far sharper than steel scalpels, which look kind of like a mountain scape in miniature under an electron microscope in comparison. metal blades sharpened by grinding are nowhere near so keen. Fail, snaKKKe, as usual.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 01:01 am
@gungasnake,
I she sctually exists, which is doubtful in the extreme. she's lying. for one thing, democrats won the election by nearly three million votes.
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 02:19 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
for one thing, democrats won the election by nearly three million votes.....


Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .....
Builder
 
  -2  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 03:04 am
@gungasnake,

Quote:
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha


I'm amazed that there's still people bleating about this, two years after the fact.

Clinton lost the election, under the same system that Obama won it, twice.

She's a heartless, gutless, worthless, self-centred, narcissistic cow.

It wouldn't have made a scrap of difference who was her opponent; she lost the election.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 04:43 am
@Builder,
She's just a woman. Get over it. And she did get three million more votes than your favorite orangutan.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 05:50 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
And actually if you really knew anything which you clearly don't, you would know rhat stone tools were actually pretty sophisticated. A pressure flaked obsidian knife blade, for example is just about the swhqrpest thing you can make, since it comes pretty close to having a monomolecular edge, far sharper than steel scalpels


Granted Aztecs and a few other old human groups used obsidian to create sharp weapons, that's not what anybody was talking about here. In the case of demokkkrats, the analogy is with Neanderthals or related hominids and not with Cro Magnon humans or groups descended from them. Try looking up "Mousterian" for a look at Neanderthal/hominid tools. None of them were overwhelmingly sharp and there is no evidence they ever used obsidian. Mousterian tools were very crude compared to real early human tools and weapon blades.

https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/ZBc3nOJrhmuti7nokqp7hq3OXZg=/400x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/1280px-Biface_Cintegabelle_MHNT_PRE_2009.0.201.1_V2-5b808b6fc9e77c00577dddd1.jpg
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Wed 9 Jan, 2019 05:52 am
@Builder,
The Hildabeast is a gangster. It would have been entirely like having Ma Barker in the white house.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events
  3. » Page 3153
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.64 seconds on 11/04/2024 at 03:50:22
▲ ▼