@Walter Hinteler,
Some people are inhuman and lack compassion. It's the first condition of being a fascist.
Schumer floats stopgap spending bill amid border wall fight.
Published November 29, 2018
Quote:Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Thursday said that Congress should pass a stopgap spending bill for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) if President Trump won't agree to the proposed $1.6 billion for border security.
Schumer said Trump had "two good bipartisan options" to avoid a shutdown - the Senate's DHS bill or a continuing resolution - both of which, he predicted, would get more than the 60 votes needed to pass the Senate.
"If the president doesn't want to agree to the bipartisan bill, we could avoid a shutdown by passing a continuing resolution for the Department of Homeland Security. We think it should be for the whole year. It would keep the government open and still provide another $1.3 billion for border security," Schumer said from the Senate floor.
Congress has until Dec. 7 to pass seven of 12 appropriations bills, including DHS, and avoid a partial government shutdown. But talks have been snarled by a months-long fight over Trump's U.S.-Mexico border wall.
Both sides have stepped up their public posturing as lawmakers eye next week's deadline.
Schumer, during his floor speech, pointed the blame for a potential shutdown directly at the president, saying if they had a lapse in funding for part of the government the president would be entirely responsible.
Schumer said the seven appropriations bills are "hanging in the balance for one reason and one reason only - President Trump."
"If President Trump wants to throw a temper tantrum and shut down some departments and agencies over Christmas, that's certainly within his power, but he has two more sensible options available to him. It would be a shame if the country suffered because of a Trump temper tantrum. It's the president's choice," Schumer added.
Meghan Burris, a spokeswoman for the Office of Management and Budget, quickly fired back saying a potential lapse in funding would lead to a "Schumer shutdown"
"Democrats would rather shut the government down and leave millions of Americans less secure than work with the administration to solve this unchecked crisis. It is evident there is a need to secure the nation's borders and the president has made it clear that is his number one priority," she said.
Trump has refused to take a shutdown off the table, saying on Wednesday that he would be "totally willing" to force a shut down if he doesn't get the $5 billion.
"We're in negotiation. If we don't get border security, possible shutdown," Trump told reporters at the White House separately on Thursday.
Both sides remain far apart over the amount of border money to include in the December bill, raising the prospects of a short-term stopgap measure.
Republicans have floated a two-year plan that would meet Trump's demand for $5 billion for border security.
The Republican offer would have secured $2.5 billion in funding for barriers and border security for both 2019 and 2020. That would be a $900 million increase over the $1.6 billion the Senate already approved for 65 miles of pedestrian fencing earlier in the year, but less than the $5 billion the House approved, in line with Trump's demands.
Part of the funding, according to Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), would have come from a combination of the already-passed $1.6 billion, unspent funds that were previously approved and potential cuts from other spending in the bills.
Shelby told reporters this week that Trump has threatened to veto the funding bill if it only included $1.6 billion for border security and Congress would not have the votes to override a veto.
But Democrats have rejected the Republicans offer of $5 billion over two years, stressing that the administration hasn't been able to spend the border money Congress has already agreed to.
"No matter how many years you spread it over, $5 billion for President Trump's wasteful wall is too much money," said Rep. Nita Lowey (N.Y.), the top Democratic appropriator in the House. "We will never support wasting tax dollars on a wall designed to gin up the Republican base."
Schumer echoed that sentiment, saying that drawing a red line at $5 billion Trump was "trying to manufacture a shutdown to fire up his base."
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/schumer-floats-stopgap-spending-bill-amid-border-wall-fight/ar-BBQgG6C?ocid=UE13DHP
@coldjoint,
You wish. Apparently Cohen values his family more than he values Trumps' idiot vapid ego.
@coldjoint,
Cohen has credibility, Trump doesn't. That's kinda what happens when you're cauight in over 5000 lies in two years. End of story.
Saudi Arabia, US take a significant step toward closing $15 billion deal for Lockheed Martin's THAAD missile defense system
Saudi Arabia has signed a letter of offer and acceptance with the United States for Lockheed Martin's THAAD missile system.
It's a significant step forward in the $15 billion deal, a State Department spokesperson confirmed to CNBC.
Saudi officials, alongside their U.S. counterparts, signed the crucial government-to-government agreement earlier this week, paving the way for the massive sale of 44 THAAD launchers, missiles and related equipment.
Amanda Macias | @amanda_m_macias
Published 4:23 PM ET Wed, 28 Nov 2018 Updated 7:04 PM ET Wed, 28 Nov 2018
CNBC.com
WASHINGTON — Saudi Arabia has signed a letter of offer and acceptance with the United States for Lockheed Martin's THAAD missile system, a significant step forward in the $15 billion deal, a State Department spokesperson confirmed to CNBC.
Saudi officials, alongside their U.S. counterparts, signed the crucial government-to-government agreement earlier this week, paving the way for the massive sale of 44 THAAD launchers, missiles and related equipment.
Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon's top weapons supplier, THAAD, or terminal high altitude area defense, is regarded as America's crown jewel in missile defense systems.
The Saudi Embassy did not respond immediately to CNBC's request for comment.
The development comes as Saudi Arabia is under fire over the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, as well as its role in the war in Yemen. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has cited the importance of defense deals in defending his decision to stick with the kingdom in the aftermath of the slaying. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has denied knowledge of the attack, although the CIA reportedly concluded that he ordered Khashoggi's death.
Saudi Arabia and the U.S. entered formal discussions for THAAD in December 2016.
"After completing required congressional notifications in 2017, followed by many months of negotiation, signing letters of offer and acceptance marks a step toward protecting the United States and its regional partners from Iranian-origin missiles," said the State Department spokesperson, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
"The sale of the THAAD missile defense system benefits U.S. national security by supporting the long-term security of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region in the face of the growing ballistic missile threat from the Iranian regime and Iran-backed extremist groups," the spokesperson added.
Thomas Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, echoed those notions.
"It's a big step forward to strengthening missile defense capabilities in the Gulf, in a couple of ways," he said. "Besides probably being the largest missile defense sale to date, it also represents an important political commitment by both the U.S. and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to counter Iranian ballistic missiles by every means possible."
Saudi Arabia's oil-rich monarchy is one of America's most crucial strategic partners and a significant patron of U.S. defense companies. The Saudis are the top buyers of U.S.-made arms, a title that has safeguarded the kingdom from retaliatory sanctions over the killing of Khashoggi and the war in Yemen.
In an extraordinary statement last week, Trump affirmed that the U.S. would continue to stand with Saudi Arabia, linking the countries' relationship to his "America first" platform. Trump also has commented on the potential impact to defense suppliers if the U.S. were to sanction the Saudis over the Khashoggi killing.
"I tell you what I don't want to do," Trump said to CBS' "60 Minutes" last month, when he was asked about possibly blocking arms sales to Riyadh. "Boeing, Lockheed, Raytheon, all these [companies]. I don't want to hurt jobs. I don't want to lose an order like that. There are other ways of punishing, to use a word that's a pretty harsh word, but it's true."
@coldjoint,
Well, at least it's painful.
@coldjoint,
We, for one thing, we know Trump lies constantly. And the White House always immediately swerves when Trump swerves in attempts to justify his latest idiocy and make it sound rational (whichusually fails). But Cohen is actually tellinh us that Trump's not telling the truth. Which distinguishes him from the other WH parrots, which gives him some credibility. Not necessarily a lot, biut compared with the sycophants, even some is a lot.