@Setanta,
Quote: does not oblige me to prove anything to you.
You've (as usual) got nothing.
Neoliberalism or neo-liberalism[1] is the 20th-century resurgence of 19th-century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism.[2]:7 Those ideas include economic liberalization policies such as privatization, austerity, deregulation, free trade[3] and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society.[11] These market-based ideas and the policies they inspired constitute a paradigm shift away from the post-war Keynesian consensus which lasted from 1945 to 1980.[12][13]
English-speakers have used the term "neoliberalism" since the start of the 20th century with different meanings,[14] but it became more prevalent in its current meaning in the 1970s and 1980s, used by scholars in a wide variety of social sciences[15][16] as well as by critics.[17][18] Modern advocates of free market policies avoid the term "neoliberal"[19] and some scholars have described the term as meaning different things to different people[20][21] as neoliberalism "mutated" into geopolitically distinct hybrids as it travelled around the world.[4] As such, neoliberalism shares many attributes with other concepts that have contested meanings, including democracy.[22]
Short story is, you can't have one without the other. Either political actions assist the economic direction, or the federal reserve creates their own policy, which is why #45 is attacking the fed, who has, BTW, already admitted that their own, Obama-sanctioned policy, has failed.
You're about as informed as a street kid, or you're trying to cover for something. I couldn't care less which it is, but you, as per your own posts, are wrong.
