192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
glitterbag
 
  6  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 01:40 pm
@ehBeth,
The part of her testimony that I found compelling was her insistence that the house she and her husband were building had to have two front doors. It led to couples counseling because it seemed ridiculous to her husband, and that’s how he learned of the specifics of the attack. She was not going to live in a house that trapped her.

That definitely rings a bell for me.
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 01:40 pm
@ehBeth,
Yes, I saw your earlier mention of that connection. I wish I had better access to information on the hidden relationships between Fox and the administration. Bill Shine will obviously still have influential connections to Fox management (and programming, surely). Coordination seems a certainty though hard to tell how much of that is going on. I think Hannity and Trump speak regularly, perhaps daily.
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 01:41 pm
@glitterbag,
Yesus, I missed that! Thank you.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 01:48 pm
@blatham,
It is hard to miss when #45 sometimes quotes a fox item directly in a tweet. Certainly no one hides the fact that he watches fox personalities for hours each day - apparently not as big a fan of fox news.
gungasnake
 
  -4  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 02:40 pm
https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42738729_2207197282938815_5408215625052979200_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&oh=efd534b8d490950fd5214b73c73dbfac&oe=5C5339B6
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 02:49 pm
@ehBeth,
Understood.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 02:51 pm
https://i1.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2018/09/image002-2.jpg?w=481&ssl=1
glitterbag
 
  5  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 02:52 pm
@coldjoint,
I am not sure if you are naive or in way over your head.
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 02:57 pm
@glitterbag,
Quote:
I am not sure if you are naive or in way over your head.

That is not your job. Either comment on what I said, not why I said it, and you will be better off. I understand that gossip interests you more than policy or any debate that gets passed name calling.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 03:29 pm
@glitterbag,
Quote:
That definitely rings a bell for me.

Quote:
Report: City Permits Show Project Ford Claimed Was In 2008, Not 2012

Quote:
In May 2012, Ford alleges that she and her husband began arguing because she wanted to add a second front door to their home.

She testified on Thursday that she wanted to add the second front door because what she alleges Kavanaugh did to her made her feel “claustrophobic.”

Soon after her testimony, Sperry sent out several tweets arguing that the Palo Alto building permits were issued to Ford in 2008, not 2012.

She is lying about that, what else? And a stupid mistake.
https://conservativedailypost.com/report-city-permits-show-project-ford-claimed-was-in-2008-not-2012/
glitterbag
 
  4  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 03:47 pm
@coldjoint,
That doesn’t mean it wasn’t the point her husband begin to think she was unreasonable. Things tend to bubble for awhile before couples seek therapy.....unless of course it happens in your rigid imagination. The real problem is that too many men think women should just take whatever happens to them as destiny and shut up and go away.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
glitterbag
 
  7  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 04:06 pm
@coldjoint,
I’m sorry Bub, what exactly is your purpose or ‘job’ here? You can fling around all the insults or belittling terms you can dream up, but it won’t make anyone take you seriously. Save your energy or faux withering wit for the merry bunch of blockheads you seem to favor.
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 04:18 pm
Of course they did. Read the whole piece.
Quote:
The White House is limiting the scope of the FBI’s investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, multiple people briefed on the matter told NBC News.

While the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s, those people familiar with the investigation told NBC News. A White House official confirmed that Swetnick's claims will not be pursued as part of the reopened background investigation into Kavanaugh.
nbc news
blatham
 
  7  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 04:36 pm
Quote:
Don McGahn “has given the FBI a list of witnesses they are permitted to interview... a significant constraint on the FBI investigation”
McGahn is the guy who is running the process for Kavanaugh's seat on the SC.

It really may be up to reporters working independently to undercut this sham investigation.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 29 Sep, 2018 05:04 pm
@glitterbag,
Quote:
You can fling around all the insults or belittling terms

Sorry, but from day one that is just responding in kind and do not tell me it is not. You are a gossip, and you fail badly at that also.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.54 seconds on 07/22/2025 at 05:58:43