@maporsche,
Yeah, something is happening...the Kavanaugh family is going to go through another, even more hellish week as Dem operatives and reporters (oops, I'm being redundant) scour the gutters in search of new victims of the serial rapist who would be a SC Justice. They will be
dragging hundred dollar bills through the faculty rooms of East and West Coast Universities hoping to find more woman (and who knows maybe a man or two - after all, Kavanaugh is so depraved he might have actually engineered bisexual rape trains) who will come forth with ever more salacious accusations.
You would think that by now the Dems would be able to find a
victim who has a
friend who is also willing to lie, but then again, why should they? Not only have the three named accusers been unable to corroborate their claims, two of them provided the names of people who were supposed to have been able to but who promptly turned around and said: "Nope, not me" and that didn't slow down the search & destroy process one bit.
Each of the five current accusations (Hey maybe there are six or seven by now - I haven't checked the news in about 15 minutes) have been thinner than those that came before. With each one, we have moved further and further into the theater of the absurd carried along by ever more salacious claims and ever less credible charges, and yet has this impressed anyone on the left?
Hell no! Can anyone here say with a straight face that if the roles of the political parties in this nomination were reversed that our laptop screens wouldn't be sticky and smeared by the dripping sarcasm of the leftwing posters here?
The NY Times shows it still has a few shreds of journalistic integrity by refusing to run the Ramirez charges on its pages (because after talking to dozen
S of people they couldn't find anyone who could corroborate them), but no problemo, The New Yorker has
sexual assault savant and seer Ronan Farrell writing for it and with his extremely extensive and time-tested experience with sexual assault stories he is able to put the Raimerez claim up against his forehead and, a la
The Great Karnak, determine it is credible enough to publish!
And just when you think the leftwing media can't sink any lower, NBC runs with an allegation from a source that won't provide
anyone with
any identifying information
at all. NBC couldn't have made even an utterly feeble effort to corroborate the allegations, but did that stop them? Nope.
It's a legitimate story of which the public has a right to know!
I wouldn't be surprised if CNN announces the next one (and there will be at least another one before this is over) was received via a microwave transmission from Mars and alleges that Brett Kavanaugh has a 32 year old half human/half martian
rape baby living with the victim, his mother, on Phobos. MSNBC will then devote 24 hours of programming to the debate on whether or not Martian sex culture is such that Martian females fall under the new rule that
all women must be believed (It's sounding more and more like a cheesy H Rider Haggard dialogue prop:
"She who must be believed!")
But as Hillary Clinton might say,
"What difference does it make?!"
To paraphrase another great work of fictional dialogue: "Evidence? We don't need no feelthy evidence!" The accused is a male (and white and conservative to boot), the accuser is a female (and liberal to boot) and the allegations involve sexual misconduct...
"I believe Survivors!" Case closed!
Remember
The Crucible, playwright Arthur Miller's allegory for what is still a rallying cry for liberals, the McCarthy hearings? Those hearings like the Salem Witch Trials, which are at the center of
The Crucible , are quintessential American symbols of injustice. Anyone who has seen and recalls the powerful play probably remembers the chilling scene wherein the governor explains to Rev Hale that the accused cannot defend themselves because if they are witches as accused, they could be invisibly working their witchcraft on all present. For most Americans, it was perceived as shocking and viscerally unfair. How can the accused not be allowed to defend themselves? How can it be that someone can be found guilty and sentenced to death solely on the say-so of the accuser, with absolutely no regard for the number of neighbors who are willing to testify to the accused's character?
I've little doubt that this post will be met by sanctimonious criticism from people enjoying the view from their high perch upon the Me Too horse. It's the perfect irrational response to criticism of irrational behavior.
Unfortunately, as in The Crucible and the McCarthy Hearings, underlying the fear and concern driving the behavior in this matter, there is devious design motivated by personal gain.
