192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 03:46 am
Quote:
Christmas comes early for the GOP and Brett Kavanaugh...


It's a sign of the desperation of the dems that this is even newsworthy to them.

Seriously, if that's all they've got, hello second-term Trump.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 04:13 am
@izzythepush,
izzy the push pushing US propaganda.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
hightor
 
  5  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 04:38 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
And what Biden said is why he did it.

So let me get this right — the majority leader of the senate takes his marching orders through informal remarks made by the former chairman of the judiciary committee rather than the provisions of the Constitution? He had no choice?
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 04:48 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi!

Garland Garland Garland!

Given that the particular discussion was about the politicization of the Supreme Court the reference to Garland was relevant. I doubt that I've brought it up before and I've certainly never used it as a rallying cry.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  4  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 05:10 am
And yet Russia was the first country to recognize Ukraine as a sovereign nation in 1991. Russia did not dispute Ukraine's sovereignty over Crimea. In fact, Russia paid Ukraine for leasing the Crimean land the Sebastopol Naval Base was on-which itself doubly recognizes the sovereignty of Ukraine over Crimea.

And the Nazis did not run Ukraine after it became a sovereign nation, the Nazi candidate barely achieved 1% of the vote after the Russian puppet Yanukovych-the candidate Manafort served-was ousted by the people for betraying Ukraine's chance to join the European Union.

However, the myth of the Ukraine government being Nazis is a constant theme broadcast on Russian social media outlets, such as RT, (Russia Today), the Russian propaganda outlet. And by their professional trolls and few Western converts.

Ukraine is being invaded by Russia as a test case for further Russian expansion into Eastern Europe, which Russia lost when it economically collapsed in 1991. Ukraine is not part of NATO, but most of Eastern Europe which Russia wants to take back is part of NATO now. This is why Russia helped Trump, the candidate who has said NATO is obsolete-in the 2016 elections.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Setanta
 
  5  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 05:34 am
Fortunately for us, and for Europe, Plump is a moron. It's the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. He has no authority over treaties. For a treaty to be ratified or rescinded, a two-thirds vote of the Senate is necessary. The Republicans don't have a two-thirds control of the Senate.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:17 am
Quote:
Federal officers have arrested dozens of immigrants who came forward to take care of immigrant children in government custody, and the Trump administration is pledging to go after more.

The news will serve as confirmation of the worst fears of immigrants and their advocates: that a recent move by President Donald Trump's administration to more fully vet people who come forward to care for undocumented immigrant children who are alone in the US has been a way for the administration to track down and arrest more undocumented immigrants.

On Tuesday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement senior official Matthew Albence testified to Congress that, after Health and Human Services and ICE signed a memorandum of agreement to background-check and fingerprint potential "sponsors" of immigrant children, ICE arrested 41 people who came forward.

In response to an inquiry from CNN, an ICE official confirmed that 70% of those arrests were for straightforward immigration violations -- meaning they were arrested because ICE discovered they were here illegally.

The individuals could have been the children's parents or family members, and they also could have merely been fellow members of the homes of adults who applied to care for the children as they fight for a legal right to stay in the US.

"We've arrested 41 individuals thus far that we've identified pursuant to that (memorandum)," Albence testified Tuesday. "Close to 80% of the individuals that are either sponsors or household members of sponsors are here in the country illegally, and a large chunk of those are criminal aliens. So we are continuing to pursue those individuals."

ICE made those arrests from early July through early September; of those, only 12 were criminal arrests, according to an ICE official speaking on condition their name not be used.

The remaining 29 were what are known as non-criminal or "administrative" arrests -- as in immigration violations.

The memorandum of agreement was signed in response to concern about past instances of children being placed in dangerous situations and HHS' inability to account for the whereabouts of hundreds of children shortly after they were released. But experts and advocates have feared the agreement to background-check and fingerprint through ICE would scare off potential sponsors.

The number of immigrant children in HHS custody has been skyrocketing to record levels, with more than 13,000 in custody as of Thursday. The average length of stay in custody has nearly doubled since 2016, to an average of 59 days, and the rate of release has dropped by thousands of children each month. The crowding has prompted HHS to triple the size of a temporary tent facility it opened in Texas at the height of the family separations crisis.

Experts and an official with knowledge have pointed to the memorandum as the likely reason for the growth since, in addition to other policies that have kept children in custody longer.

It has long been true that undocumented children who arrive in the US by themselves will often seek to be placed with relatives who may also be living in the US illegally. The administration has described this process as a circumvention of law in order to exploit more lenient policies for children, even labeling it "smuggling" of children.

But the advocates who work with the children and the attorneys who represent them say many of these children are fleeing extremely dangerous situations in their home countries and have legitimate claims to stay in the US that could take years to pursue. Family and friends already in the US can provide stable homes for them as they pursue those avenues of legal status.

HHS does not consider a person's immigration status as a factor in whether they are suitable to care for children, and the Obama administration did not make a practice of arresting people who came forward as sponsors. The Trump administration has hinted it would take the opposite approach, and Thursday's revelation confirmed that.

The administration has made clear it considers any undocumented immigrant to be eligible for arrest, and has targeted laws designed to protect children as "loopholes" that attract more illegal immigration.

Experts who focus on children warn that using the HHS system -- which is designed as a bridge for traumatized kids into a situation where they can make legal claims to stay in the US -- as an arm of law enforcement is contrary to the principles of child welfare.

Meanwhile, the system is already taxed beyond its normal population.

HHS' Office of Refugee Resettlement "has a hard enough job to do when they can be focused on being a family-serving organization charged with reuniting children with their family, and when that mission is compromised by making them collect information for the purposes of immigration enforcement, that runs contrary to their primary mission and it's contrary to the best interests of children," said Maria Cancian, a former HHS deputy assistant secretary and a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

A former Obama administration official worried the government's new tactics could harm children in its custody.

"These are kids who fled some of the most violent countries in the world. Many have experienced trauma ... rape, robbery, all kinds of exploitation," said Bob Carey, who ran the HHS office overseeing child detention at the end of the Obama administration.

"The question I would ask is, are measures legitimately enhancing the security situation?" added Carey, who's now a leadership and government fellow with the Open Society Foundations. "The ultimate security is not releasing any child to a sponsor, because then nothing would happen to them. But how much harm are you causing by keeping kids in custody indefinitely in settings that were never designed for that?

In September 2017, then-ICE acting Director Tom Homan said at a public event that his agency would arrest undocumented people who came forward to care for the children.

"You cannot hide in the shadows," Homan said at a Washington border security event, adding that parents should be "shoulder-to-shoulder" with their children in court. "We're going to put the parents in proceedings, immigration proceedings, at a minimum. ... Is that cruel? I don't think so."


CNN


Yes it is cruel, the whole administration is cruel, inept and corrupt. They are not good people in the least in any way shape or form. Their whole attitude goes contrary to how imagined our country to stand for. The land of opportunity and the place to start anew, the place to flee to for those in countries with hopeless situations.

I know the arguments, "they are here illegally, blah blah..." They are still human beings. The children are human beings, not bait to catch other illegals. There should be a way for people to come here a whole lot easier, and a way for illegals to become legals without any repecusions for being here illegally.
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:20 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
They will treat her with kid gloves.
Let's remember you said this, apparently believing it.
maporsche
 
  4  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:37 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
They will treat her with kid gloves.
Let's remember you said this, apparently believing it.


He didn't really believe it when he said it either. When he said it, it looked like she wasn't going to testify, so there was no harm in making such a bold and foolish proclamation because we'd never know the truth because we wouldn't see her testify.

Well, now she's going to testify and Finn will be pointed out to be either a liar or an idiot. Not sure which he'd prefer.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:42 am
@blatham,
Perhaps we will see if Finn's unlikely prediction comes true. My prediction is they will treat with her condescension at best. She has set her terms of appearing, apparently the committee will respond today.

Quote:
Ford's attorney also relayed her concern about security and asked that the committee work with her to ensure she would be safe if she agrees to testify.

Here are the other items Ford requested:

Wants to testify second and Kavanaugh to appear first;

Doesn't want Kavanaugh in the room at the same time with her;

Prefers not to be questioned by outside counsel, but rather by the senators on the committee;

Would like the committee to subpoena Mark Judge, the other student Ford alleges to be in the room at the time of the assault, to testify;

Says each senator should have equal time questioning (already committee practice);

No time limit on her opening statement; and

Will appear at a public hearing but she would like to limit the number of cameras to pool coverage.



NBC NEWS
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:43 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
This is the, frankly, the evil notion of social justice.

Kavanaugh is a privileged white male.

Privileged white males have committed offenses against minorities.

Therefore in the name of social justice, Kavanaugh must suffer as a representative of his kind irrespective of personal guilt.


Disgusting.
You suppose a connection/suggestion I did not make. There are two relevant issues here:

1) that political power in the US is held overwhelmingly by white males. That's a simple and obvious empirical truth

2) that there are huge differences in privilege bestowed as a matter of being born into wealth or into poverty. These variations in privilege are enhanced by the social connections and educational opportunities afforded the wealthy and tend to carry through generations (ie Trump, Dubya or Kavanaugh and his buddies/fellow students at his prep school). This too is a simple and obvious empirical truth.

When I referenced the piece on Kavanaugh's lifelong group of friends/associates as described in the piece I was pointing 2). This is a or the core of an actual sphere of elitism in Washington and beyond.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:53 am
@revelette1,
Such a christian operation, that one. Imagine how much worse it would be if these Spanish speaking immigrants were Jews.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 07:15 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
My prediction is they will treat with her condescension at best.
It will be, if it happens, a show trial. Everyone will be playing to an audience they believe is out there and one which they wish to influence, as always, with these things. Because the Republicans wish to/need to paint Ford as either stupid/female flighty/a Dem agent AND because they really, really want Kavanaugh on the bench (this is a decades-long project of the Federalist Society), that's what they'll, set out to do. The only respect in which "kid gloves" has any connection to reality is that Grassley and the others will understand the PR realities that they face. Condescension at best...oh yes. But the really heavy lifting in their task of crushing and maligning her will be left to the right wing media universe which Grassley and the rest know they can count on.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 07:24 am
Josh Marshall on the Ed Whelan debacle. This is a must read.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 08:07 am
Quote:
Poll: More Americans oppose Kavanaugh's confirmation than support it

40% of Americans are opposed to Brett Kavanaugh being confirmed to the Supreme Court, while only 31% support his confirmation, according to a new poll by USA Today and Ipsos Public Affairs.
Axios
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 08:11 am
This morning, our house is very warm from the standpoint of heat.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 08:22 am
Any study of the modern conservative movement has to make an accounting of this crowd and their significant influence on the GOP
Quote:
Worried their chance to cement a conservative majority on the Supreme Court could slip away, a growing number of evangelical and anti-abortion leaders are expressing frustration that Senate Republicans and the White House are not protecting Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh more forcefully from a sexual assault allegation and warning that conservative voters may stay home in November if his nomination falls apart.
NYT
revelette1
 
  4  
Fri 21 Sep, 2018 08:23 am
@blatham,
The Clarence Thomas factor lingers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 08:43:33